eejay the dj

Have the corrupt Sfa/Spfl/Peter liewells cabal came out yet with "any defence "

60 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

Been on holiday bears 

Not seen anything about this shower of contemptible beggar loving scum saying anything yet 

Or are they doing exactly what they did 6 years ago and laying low like the pitiful wee rhats in power,that they are 

Any updates 

Edited by eejay the dj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well to be fair 'they" ( thats Liewell of course) made a statement but Regan slapped it down saying nothing had changed. Which is true. We were hung out to dry before the BTC verdict i.e. guilty until proven guilty. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Deanzmeanzheinz said:

Well to be fair 'they" ( thats Liewell of course) made a statement but Regan slapped it down saying nothing had changed. Which is true. We were hung out to dry before the BTC verdict i.e. guilty until proven guilty. 

Cheers mate 

I was answering my own question as I probably knew that little weasel would say something with no weight to it 

Just felt the need to start a thread with some honest words about these bastards

Indulge me bears 😊 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

4 minutes ago, KeyserSoze said:

Saltcoats no wifi eejay?

No bear would drink in that beggar infested shite tip .Never mind a holiday 😀

 

Edited by eejay the dj
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

No bear would drink in that beggar infested shite tip .Never mind a holiday 😀

 

Fuck you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the SPFL said they would take their time to consider the BTC verdict and any implications for the SPFL.

I don't trust they bastards for a second. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, BlueAvenger said:

Think the SPFL said they would take their time to consider the BTC verdict and any implications for the SPFL.

I don't trust they bastards for a second. 

Thats a lot of considering the cunts are doing. Spl rules are not war and peace ffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They canny make the rules up as they go along - surely no!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a certainty they corrupt cunts will try take our titles hope they know what their in for when they do only so much we can take before we say enough is enough

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said:

You can bet that liewell is phoning around all the rest of the hate filled cunts running Scottish football making sure he has all his ducks in a row before they make a move. 

I don't think Lawell will actually be as desperate to strip us of honours as someone like that wee fanny Thompson will be. Desmond's bank getting a fine won't be the end of the tax evasion issues for him, and eventually that'll lead HMRC to look closer at Celtic's history of tax avoidance. I don't think Lawell will do anything more than pay lip service to appease the unwashed as, unlike those gullible tits, he'll know there's a chance that the shoe could be on the other foot in a few years. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye they made their ruling a couple of years back but there's absolutely no way a would trust the cunts not to find a way to change that outcome the splf are corrupt to the fuckin core if they can find a way to come for our titles u can be certain they will 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Aubie92 said:

I don't think Lawell will actually be as desperate to strip us of honours as someone like that wee fanny Thompson will be. Desmond's bank getting a fine won't be the end of the tax evasion issues for him, and eventually that'll lead HMRC to look closer at Celtic's history of tax avoidance. I don't think Lawell will do anything more than pay lip service to appease the unwashed as, unlike those gullible tits, he'll know there's a chance that the shoe could be on the other foot in a few years. 

Sorry but that cunt is more desperate to strip all he can from us than the rest. It's his club that led the renewed clamour to punish Rangers again and again. As for HMRC investigating them, that's just wishful thinking. They might be rotten to the core but with their power in the game up here he makes sure there's no appetite to punish them for off field criminal activities. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Aubie92 said:

I don't think Lawell will actually be as desperate to strip us of honours as someone like that wee fanny Thompson will be. Desmond's bank getting a fine won't be the end of the tax evasion issues for him, and eventually that'll lead HMRC to look closer at Celtic's history of tax avoidance. I don't think Lawell will do anything more than pay lip service to appease the unwashed as, unlike those gullible tits, he'll know there's a chance that the shoe could be on the other foot in a few years. 

You better believe he is, the thing is he's not stupid like the rest of the cunts. He knows there are no rules broken but he will sit back and wind up the rest of them and wait and see where it goes. 

If for a second it looks like it's going somewhere he will be in like a shot. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Alves70 said:

Legally they can't no matter how much they may want to.

1. If they tried to go against the LNS ruling Rangers would simply take them to court and SPFL would lose and end up paying thousands in costs. Would be an open and shut case as they've signed legal documents saying the ruling is final and the SPFL have given up the right to appeal legally as well.

2. If they brought in a rule in 2017 and retrospectively applied them to 2001-2010 then same as above Rangers lawyers would drive a bus though that and the SPFL would lose and end up paying costs.

The titles are going nowhere we can all chill about it.

Wish a had your confidence about it mate just can't help feeling they will find a way if they know what's good for them then they won't try cos like a said there's only so much we can take 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Alves70 said:

Legally they can't no matter how much they may want to.

1. If they tried to go against the LNS ruling Rangers would simply take them to court and SPFL would lose and end up paying thousands in costs. Would be an open and shut case as they've signed legal documents saying the ruling is final and the SPFL have given up the right to appeal legally as well.

2. If they brought in new rules in 2017 and retrospectively applied them to 2001-2010 then same as above Rangers lawyers would drive a bus though that and the SPFL would lose and end up paying costs.

The titles are going nowhere we can all chill about it.

Thanks for posting that. :thumbup:

I have read many posts on here over the last few years and can only hope your take on it is correct mate, because these cunts will try every trick in the book. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Aubie92 said:

I don't think Lawell will actually be as desperate to strip us of honours as someone like that wee fanny Thompson will be. Desmond's bank getting a fine won't be the end of the tax evasion issues for him, and eventually that'll lead HMRC to look closer at Celtic's history of tax avoidance. I don't think Lawell will do anything more than pay lip service to appease the unwashed as, unlike those gullible tits, he'll know there's a chance that the shoe could be on the other foot in a few years. 

Agree to a point Lawell isn't desperate to strip us of honours while also appeasing the unwashed.

Timing is everything with them; kick up a SMSM frenzy to deflect from the real story they're trying to keep under raps, currently 4 ex Celtic coaches and 1 Renfrewshire coach arrested/charged and a recent announcement that a total of 11 have been arrested so far, while the media ignore who the other 6 are. 

Could the other 6 also be also linked to them and this be the reason for stirring thing up just now?

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SFA have closed it, they sought counsel and were told there's no way you can further sanction the club

The SPFL are the ones I'm worrying about, Lawwell has them all right under his thumb, they may push for sanctions but that doesn't mean they're going to be successful, it's all playground type threats the now, they know deep down they're getting fuck-all out of it and will play the "SPFL/SFA ARE CORRUPT ALL ABOUT SEVCO" card as they're all a bunch of sociopaths and mentally challenged begging bastards 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now