Bellshill_Bear

Should we copy chelsea?

58 posts in this topic

Fucking hell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalcio wing back :confused:

Windass wing back 😑

Enough said 😩

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the fuck would we put Windass at Wing back when that's Waghorns position and No need for another CB to be brought in because Miller can do a job there

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said:

Written by a clown!

Most of the articles on that site make me laugh. Clowns and simpletons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they won their league. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck everything about chelsea and this disabled, autistic excuse for an article.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking fuckholes

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lloyd72 said:

Why the fuck would we put Windass at Wing back when that's Waghorns position and No need for another CB to be brought in because Miller can do a job there

One player for every position required as cover for Miller...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeez louise,

This place gets so uptight at the mere suggestion of football debate 😂

Chelsea aren't making the suggestion dont know why everybody'ssaying fuck chelsea.

Personally i hope i have seen the ladt of the 433 which should be 3 upfront but ends up with 1 upfront and 2 wide (thats what wingers are for) our 433 is basically a 451. Same with the 4231, its a 451 

We should play 2 up front at all times!!! 1 suggestion is the 442 so the wingers can go wide and leave 2 in the box. The only trouble with that is against physical or decent sides we have 2 in midfield which can be overrun. The 442 would rely on a hardworking midfield with plenty if energy and a good back 4 which we dont have. Strong fullbacks are a must

My other suggestion is the one i would like to see. The 352 with attacking fullbacks. 2 upfront 3 good midfielders and a back 3. When under pressure this eould mean we would have 5 at the back.  When cointer attacking (transition as pedro calls it) our wingbacks would provide wide oitballs and 1 midfielder could support the 2 attackers. This can be made more defensive by having a defensive mid sitting behind the 2 other mids or attacking having an attacking mid sitting behind the forwards.

352 with wingbacks is the way forward, pass it on

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Holt & Windass as wingbacks :lol: 

From the guy that gave us Boab Malcolm was one of the best passers in Europe.

Guys retarded.

Edit. Someone else has wrote it for his site. Even worse that there's someone that rivals him for stupidity.

Edited by MasterD
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Bellshill_Bear said:

...We should play 2 up front at all times!!!...

Still have the fear that formations are moot with shit players, but two up front might at least focus their tiny brains into passing in that direction occasionally, even in panic.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lay off the prop m8!! 🇬🇧🇬🇧

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Bellshill_Bear said:

Jeez louise,

This place gets so uptight at the mere suggestion of football debate 😂

Chelsea aren't making the suggestion dont know why everybody'ssaying fuck chelsea.

Personally i hope i have seen the ladt of the 433 which should be 3 upfront but ends up with 1 upfront and 2 wide (thats what wingers are for) our 433 is basically a 451. Same with the 4231, its a 451 

We should play 2 up front at all times!!! 1 suggestion is the 442 so the wingers can go wide and leave 2 in the box. The only trouble with that is against physical or decent sides we have 2 in midfield which can be overrun. The 442 would rely on a hardworking midfield with plenty if energy and a good back 4 which we dont have. Strong fullbacks are a must

My other suggestion is the one i would like to see. The 352 with attacking fullbacks. 2 upfront 3 good midfielders and a back 3. When under pressure this eould mean we would have 5 at the back.  When cointer attacking (transition as pedro calls it) our wingbacks would provide wide oitballs and 1 midfielder could support the 2 attackers. This can be made more defensive by having a defensive mid sitting behind the 2 other mids or attacking having an attacking mid sitting behind the forwards.

352 with wingbacks is the way forward, pass it on

 

Jeez Louise :lol: 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The authors name says it all. Dick.

IMG_9785.PNG

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Five at the back works for Chelsea because they play against technically good footballers and the extra man at the back is an asset. Fuck going five at the back in the SPFL, utter mongo suggestion.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought from the initial title the writer was suggesting us buying young talent and then selling on (with a respectable 'buy-back' clause written in for a few years down the line).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see a big future for Alnwick playing the no 10 position

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That guy has been sniffing Jo Brand's underpants 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now