Bellshill_Bear 1,105 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 http://www.ibroxnoise.co.uk/2017/07/should-rangers-copy-chelsea.html?m=1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 82,114 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Fucking hell Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_22 40 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Dalcio wing back Windass wing back ? Enough said ?        Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lloyd72 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Why the fuck would we put Windass at Wing back when that's Waghorns position and No need for another CB to be brought in because Miller can do a job there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,449 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Fuck you. Fuck Chelsea. And fuck Ibrox Noise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
there'sonlyoneamoruso 1,724 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 8 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: Written by a clown! Most of the articles on that site make me laugh. Clowns and simpletons. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeWallaceRFC 3,920 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
With Heart and Hand 8,949 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Fuck Chelsea Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrfc95 4,255 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Yes they won their league. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoopsLaud 4,184 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Fucking fuckholes  Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
With Heart and Hand 8,949 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 "well what do you think Premier league winners Chelsea are?" A no mark club with no history who are now a billionaires plaything with tourist fans and don't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as Rangers FCÂ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilly86 701 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 11 minutes ago, Lloyd72 said: Why the fuck would we put Windass at Wing back when that's Waghorns position and No need for another CB to be brought in because Miller can do a job there One player for every position required as cover for Miller... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellshill_Bear 1,105 Posted July 15, 2017 Author Share Posted July 15, 2017 Jeez louise, This place gets so uptight at the mere suggestion of football debate ? Chelsea aren't making the suggestion dont know why everybody'ssaying fuck chelsea. Personally i hope i have seen the ladt of the 433 which should be 3 upfront but ends up with 1 upfront and 2 wide (thats what wingers are for) our 433 is basically a 451. Same with the 4231, its a 451 We should play 2 up front at all times!!! 1 suggestion is the 442 so the wingers can go wide and leave 2 in the box. The only trouble with that is against physical or decent sides we have 2 in midfield which can be overrun. The 442 would rely on a hardworking midfield with plenty if energy and a good back 4 which we dont have. Strong fullbacks are a must My other suggestion is the one i would like to see. The 352 with attacking fullbacks. 2 upfront 3 good midfielders and a back 3. When under pressure this eould mean we would have 5 at the back.  When cointer attacking (transition as pedro calls it) our wingbacks would provide wide oitballs and 1 midfielder could support the 2 attackers. This can be made more defensive by having a defensive mid sitting behind the 2 other mids or attacking having an attacking mid sitting behind the forwards. 352 with wingbacks is the way forward, pass it on  Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,435 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Holt & Windass as wingbacks  From the guy that gave us Boab Malcolm was one of the best passers in Europe. Guys retarded. Edit. Someone else has wrote it for his site. Even worse that there's someone that rivals him for stupidity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilly86 701 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 4 minutes ago, Bellshill_Bear said: ...We should play 2 up front at all times!!!... Still have the fear that formations are moot with shit players, but two up front might at least focus their tiny brains into passing in that direction occasionally, even in panic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuzo78 35 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Lay off the prop m8!! ???? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,449 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 10 minutes ago, Bellshill_Bear said: Jeez louise, This place gets so uptight at the mere suggestion of football debate ? Chelsea aren't making the suggestion dont know why everybody'ssaying fuck chelsea. Personally i hope i have seen the ladt of the 433 which should be 3 upfront but ends up with 1 upfront and 2 wide (thats what wingers are for) our 433 is basically a 451. Same with the 4231, its a 451 We should play 2 up front at all times!!! 1 suggestion is the 442 so the wingers can go wide and leave 2 in the box. The only trouble with that is against physical or decent sides we have 2 in midfield which can be overrun. The 442 would rely on a hardworking midfield with plenty if energy and a good back 4 which we dont have. Strong fullbacks are a must My other suggestion is the one i would like to see. The 352 with attacking fullbacks. 2 upfront 3 good midfielders and a back 3. When under pressure this eould mean we would have 5 at the back.  When cointer attacking (transition as pedro calls it) our wingbacks would provide wide oitballs and 1 midfielder could support the 2 attackers. This can be made more defensive by having a defensive mid sitting behind the 2 other mids or attacking having an attacking mid sitting behind the forwards. 352 with wingbacks is the way forward, pass it on  Jeez Louise  Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,104 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 The authors name says it all. Dick. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddiqi_drinker 14,635 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 who writes this shite?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEE 4,880 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Five at the back works for Chelsea because they play against technically good footballers and the extra man at the back is an asset. Fuck going five at the back in the SPFL, utter mongo suggestion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 I thought from the initial title the writer was suggesting us buying young talent and then selling on (with a respectable 'buy-back' clause written in for a few years down the line). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosco88 66 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 I can see a big future for Alnwick playing the no 10 position Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanzmeanzheinz 4,312 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 That guy has been sniffing Jo Brand's underpants Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,886 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Up the headhunters.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duffy2391 574 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 I'm up for 3 at the back ... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.