Jump to content

Athletic World Champs London 2017


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, JamieD said:

I appreciate that it makes people uncomfortable, but athletics isn't supposed to be fair. The people with natural gifts are supposed to excel. There are, as far as I'm aware, no plans to ban men with higher than normal testosterone, or any other biological advantage. They aren't testing long distance runners and insisting that anybody with a red blood cell volume over 50% should be disqualified for having an unfair advantage, so why this focus on people like Semenya? 

Ironically I'd bet when she lines up for the 800m she'll be the only one not cheating.

The only way she got beat in the 800 was by a Russian doper. Maybe they will look into these things. On tv they said there may be news in September.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

5 minutes ago, JamieD said:

I didn't say he has high testosterone levels, I said he's a physical freak. He has uncommonly long legs for a person with the high density of fast twitch muscle fibres required to be a top-level sprinter. This means that, like other sprinters, he has explosivity, but unlike other sprinters, he doesn't have to take as many strides to cover 100m, which means less fatigue. This is a distinct physical advantage which, like Semenya's, is a natural gift but, unlike Semenya's, nobody talks about as unfair, for reasons I can't quite understand. If the argument is that her gift means nobody else gets a chance, so what? Nobody else got a chance in men's sprinting for the last 9 years.

I don't think undescended testes (and if true, no ovaries or uterus) is a gift.  I know she 'identifies' as a female and was brought up as a girl - but intersex characteristics give her an unfair advantage over women athletes imo.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

I don't think undescended testes (and if true, no ovaries or uterus) is a gift.  I know she 'identifies' as a female and was brought up as a girl - but intersex characteristics give her an unfair advantage over women athletes imo.

 

It's very clearly a physical gift as far as athletics goes, which is what we're talking about.

Why is her advantage unfair but every other athlete's physical advantages aren't? Is it a question of degree, or absolute? If an athlete's heightened testosterone was being produced by her ovaries rather than undescended testes, would that be ok in your opinion? Would it be ok for an intersex athlete to run if, for whatever reason, her testosterone was at "normal" levels for a woman? Is there a particular level beyond which it's "unfair"? Should the fairness be measured in how much of an advantage is being gained, and how do you propose we measure that? Until these very complicated questions have been explored in depth, I don't see how the sport can even begin to talk about the issue as if anybody has any idea of what terms like "fair" would even mean. The reality is that this will have been happening in women's sprinting and middle distance running since day one. Many athletes probably won't even know they are intersex. The list of the top 10 800m runners in history reads like a who's who of either suspected intersex athletes or Eastern Bloc robots from the 1980s. Notably, Semenya is not in the top 10 times, yet she has to bear the burden of the debate. I feel sorry for her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can run 7 seconds faster over that distance, I know it is tactical and not quite as simple but if you are at the top of your form ignore the field and lap at the times you know can give you that time and the gold medal is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pcbear said:

She can run 7 seconds faster over that distance, I know it is tactical and not quite as simple but if you are at the top of your form ignore the field and lap at the times you know can give you that time and the gold medal is yours.

You do far more work when front running.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curious to what a fresh Van Niekerk can do the 200 in. 9.93 speed mixed with 43 over the 400 should mean 19.6ish at worst, and potentially far faster. The guy is a freak. If he makes the 200 final it will be something like his 6th race in 7 days which isn't ideal, though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JamieD said:

Seemed like terrible tactics from the group to go slow and not shake off Semenya, and terrible tactics from Semenya to leave it so late.

Exactly, it was horrendous tactics from Muir. She went straight to the front and kept it slow - an athlete who is also doing the 5000 thinks it makes sense to keep it slow when Semanya is in the race - a 800m specialist!

It was like watching an Yvonne Murray race from 25/30 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, thehost said:

Ive come on this thread and there is not one fucking picture of any of the birds ffs

Have a long look at yourselves

Here you go mate. 

This is the one JamieD has been creaming himself over. 

CasterSemenya_1465732c.jpg.0ac0da1e9d5bde149303f35da6349b9d.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 21 April 2024 14:00 Until 16:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hearts
      Hampden Park
      Scottish Cup

×
×
  • Create New...