The Appeal

[theiconicman 2,977]

So when is it?

What are the odds of it being convened on Tuesday, quick smart?

[FSM 20,892]

He moved his head towards Stokes, straight red card. File under 'Fanny' and move on.

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,123]

Not going to happen, Pedro can go whistle 

[danger ranger 922]

Lost control of the game then lost control of our discipline then lost the game, lets not lose our good sense of judgment.

[ianferguson 2,619]

Straight red and all he did was ruffle Stokes's hair, they noised us up and we fell for it . Learn from it and move on , sadly Miller took some abuse on RM today even though he called it right. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,622]

This morning hopefully.

Inconclusive enough to warrant an appeal.

Have seen folk get off with far worse.

 

[kelvd1873 7,133]

5 hours ago, Rangers_no1 said:

No point in appealing now, evidence shows Jack got a deserved red card.

What evidence mate? Everything I have seen so far shows stokes leaning in and then grabbing jack by the throat!!

[Jelavic191 4,399]

I would imagine it probably will be upheld. However, I hope it can be used to show Stokes role in the sending off as he wasn't booked at that time and punishment should be handed out as this was the second time in the match that he should have sent off. 

[born a blue nose 90,720]

Retrospective action should be took with stokes on at least one of his incidents. Dirty scumbag bastard. 

[its_an_extender 869]

42 minutes ago, born a blue nose said:

Retrospective action should be took with stokes on at least one of his incidents. Dirty scumbag bastard. 

He should but doesn't matter a fuck now. Fuckin joke

[dan_ger 1,454]

Where's this evidence against Jack? 

[onefootwillie 1,518]

The TV evidence that the BBC showed last night made it appear Jack moved his head toward Stokes but this was shot directly from behind Jack it does not show if any contact was made and does not show if it was done in an aggressive manner . It does not show it context to the overall time frame of the incident so I can't see how they can say Jack deserved to be sent off. 

[gmcf 34,093]

16 minutes ago, onefootwillie said:

The TV evidence that the BBC showed last night made it appear Jack moved his head toward Stokes but this was shot directly from behind Jack it does not show if any contact was made and does not show if it was done in an aggressive manner . It does not show it context to the overall time frame of the incident so I can't see how they can say Jack deserved to be sent off. 

You could well be right . 

My initial thought was he's fucked but looking at the original side view , there's no reaction from Stokes , which you thought there would have been even if it had been a gesture . Could it have been a lunge forward before going head to head telling him to come ahead in anger  ? 

Hard to tell because the two angles just don't seem to match up . 

[theclothmonster 1,704]

4 hours ago, ianferguson said:

Straight red and all he did was ruffle Stokes's hair, they noised us up and we fell for it . Learn from it and move on , sadly Miller took some abuse on RM today even though he called it right. 

Shame Miller didn't call it during the game and get amongst his team mates and be the leader we needed, an empty armband on the pitch just like Wallace.

[onefootwillie 1,518]

16 minutes ago, gmcf said:

You could well be right . 

My initial thought was he's fucked but looking at the original side view , there's no reaction from Stokes , which you thought there would have been even if it had been a gesture . Could it have been a lunge forward before going head to head telling him to come ahead in anger  ? 

Hard to tell because the two angles just don't seem to match up . 

I thought it did not match up . The clearest views show Jack did nothing on this but we can't change him being sent off . However we will see if he gets the red card rescinded soon. 

[Thewhitesettler 2,711]

I must be getting really old. My old eyes told me that Stokes was the aggressor, and he moved his head towards Jacks head, before grabbing him by the throat. Maybe I'm looking through my blue glasses, and Jack jumped up, and stuck the head on Stokes? 

The only way they could've been head to head, was if Stokes moved his head downward toward Jacks, since Stokes is a couple of inches bigger than Jack. IMHO!!!

[The Blue Sea of Ibrox 2000 66]

Never a red card yellow at most.  Also panel needs to look a Stokes behaviour as he should have been given a red card for assault on Tav. Also don't understand how Tav. got a yellow for the incident. Stokes again deserved straight red for assault on Ryan but never even got a second yellow!

 

 

[eejay the dj 31,964]

1 hour ago, onefootwillie said:

The TV evidence that the BBC showed last night made it appear Jack moved his head toward Stokes but this was shot directly from behind Jack it does not show if any contact was made and does not show if it was done in an aggressive manner . It does not show it context to the overall time frame of the incident so I can't see how they can say Jack deserved to be sent off. 

That is BBC Scumbags for you . The probably trolled through all the footage to find the most damning . Used their skills to enhance the frame and make it look as if he was closer . his gesture was to show what Stokes did to him . As I far as I could see at the game .

You bet your bottom dollar . Any beggar fuckpig compliance officer would only use their footage

Signed off from Cris mutant loving , specie bastard Mcclauchlan himself

I'm sure Ally McCoist might back him up

[eejay the dj 31,964]

29 minutes ago, onefootwillie said:

I thought it did not match up . The clearest views show Jack did nothing on this but we can't change him being sent off . However we will see if he gets the red card rescinded soon. 

Like I said mate . They will use the most damning . And to think Brown got off with the most blatant Red card , you will ever see

[linfield1690 4,249]

2 hours ago, born a blue nose said:

Retrospective action should be took with stokes on at least one of his incidents. Dirty scumbag bastard. 

A fucking heed for an eye I say

[TMB 14,167]

Scott Brown near enough chopped a player in two with a tackle last season.  He got a red card and was rightly sent off for it.  He appealed and the red card was taken away in retrospect.  If we appeal maybe we'll win anaw this is the circus of Scottish football. 

[graeme_4 34,371]

5 hours ago, ianferguson said:

Straight red and all he did was ruffle Stokes's hair, they noised us up and we fell for it . Learn from it and move on , sadly Miller took some abuse on RM today even though he called it right. 

Shame he didn't deal with it as a captain on the park, or privately with Jack. 

Instead airing his thoughts on it to the wider media, along with some kind words for 'Lenny' and 'Stokesy'.

Should be backing his team mate up, instead of throwing him under the bus. We all know he's prepping for his last contract at Hibs before moving into punditry though...

[Cedrick 8,048]

Sat in the Sandy Jardine front I said to my mate jacks off as soon as I seen it 

[Loyal Bear 72 363]

9 hours ago, FSM said:

He moved his head towards Stokes, straight red card. File under 'Fanny' and move on.

Not if there is no contact. 

[Tom0411 1,226]

2 hours ago, onefootwillie said:

The TV evidence that the BBC showed last night made it appear Jack moved his head toward Stokes but this was shot directly from behind Jack it does not show if any contact was made and does not show if it was done in an aggressive manner . It does not show it context to the overall time frame of the incident so I can't see how they can say Jack deserved to be sent off. 

The BBC tried every angle until they found one that appeared to show Jack moving his head towards Stoke's face, but it was from behind. Whereas every other angle appeared to show Stokes moving his head at the same time. Then again it is the corrupt sporting section of BBC Scotland, so what do we expect.