Bheast FC: Statement

[KingKirk 25,633]

4 minutes ago, soulboy said:

Dave King made a statement in July after the tax case and paedo fc were bumping their gums about an investigation, now they are bumping their gums again and nothing has changed since July you can read the July statement here.

 

https://Rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/dave-king-message/

Something has changed child sex abuse cases are getting closer to the courtrooms squeaky bum time for beast fc

[City_of_Blue 565]

I've got to say, I'm personally enjoying the frothy seethe that's rampant just now.

Cunts looking like they've contracted a serious case of rabies from rhabid bats...actually that's how they normally look, but anyway.

Conspiracy this, conspiracy that. Corruption everywhere.

Must be absolutely shite waking up and that's your life.

 55 really will be the end of them?

 

[Bears r us 30,794]

26 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

Agreed. They can't be shite bags using their mouth pieces in them 2 groups. 

It would be totally wrong on this occasion IMO. 

[Laudrup1984 25,100]

Hibs statement

Hibernian supporters have contacted the Club directly, and via their two elected Non-Executive Directors, to enquire as to the Club’s position regarding Rangers, HMRC and the use of EBTs.

The Board has discussed the matter at successive Board meetings, and has come to a unanimous view. The Club had intended to make this known earlier, but a variety of factors, not least the need to focus on and conclude Hibernian business during the transfer window, delayed this.

Your Board fully understands the concerns of supporters regarding this issue, on all sides of the argument.

During the past six years, the matter has been interrogated by the highest courts in the land, by the SFA, and by the SPFL. In recent weeks, both the SPFL and SFA have taken extensive legal advice which does not support or encourage taking further action.

The lengthy and detailed explanation of the SPFL legal advice (July 26th 2017) makes clear that this matter has now been thoroughly examined by some of Scotland’s keenest legal minds, and their opinion is that – given the rules which applied at that time - no additional sanctions could be retrospectively applied. Similar legal views have been obtained by the SFA. Both organisations have looked at the issue and at potential sanctions, and have received strong and clear legal advice.

The SPFL – whilst accepting that no additional sanctions can be retrospectively applied – wants an independent review into how the issue was handled. The SFA has referred a specific aspect to its compliance officer. For all of these reasons, we also do not support the letter from the SPFL calling for a further independent review.

Your Board believes our game faces a choice.  We either continue to spend significant sums of money and huge reserves of time and energy to challenge already lengthy and detailed legal advice.  Or, we can focus on doing all we can to invest in the future of our Club and the wider game to improve our sport, and ensure there can be no repeat of the issues raised

We prefer the latter option - working to ensure that in the future our game is fairer and more open, and has the potential to secure greater commercial income to fund further improvement for the longer term.

Scottish football is finally emerging from a period of significant turbulence, which has damaged the sport, into a much more exciting future. While we know this is a divisive issue that will never be resolved to the satisfaction of all supporters, we cannot allow it to divert us from the future or to keep us mired in the past.

It is the view of your Board that we should focus 100% on a brighter future for Hibernian, and for the game. All of our energy will be used trying to bring future success to our own club, and to working together to create a future that all of our supporters can be proud of, on and off the pitch.

[MayboleLoyal_atb 3,688]

Tarriers caught out lieing again

[RossS1873 1,656]

Even Petrie and Dempster not backing them 

perhaps they need to release another statement saying 'We were talking shite and have made a cunt of ourselves' 

[K.A.I 36,183]

3 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said:

Hibs statement

Hibernian supporters have contacted the Club directly, and via their two elected Non-Executive Directors, to enquire as to the Club’s position regarding Rangers, HMRC and the use of EBTs.

The Board has discussed the matter at successive Board meetings, and has come to a unanimous view. The Club had intended to make this known earlier, but a variety of factors, not least the need to focus on and conclude Hibernian business during the transfer window, delayed this.

Your Board fully understands the concerns of supporters regarding this issue, on all sides of the argument.

During the past six years, the matter has been interrogated by the highest courts in the land, by the SFA, and by the SPFL. In recent weeks, both the SPFL and SFA have taken extensive legal advice which does not support or encourage taking further action.

The lengthy and detailed explanation of the SPFL legal advice (July 26th 2017) makes clear that this matter has now been thoroughly examined by some of Scotland’s keenest legal minds, and their opinion is that – given the rules which applied at that time - no additional sanctions could be retrospectively applied. Similar legal views have been obtained by the SFA. Both organisations have looked at the issue and at potential sanctions, and have received strong and clear legal advice.

The SPFL – whilst accepting that no additional sanctions can be retrospectively applied – wants an independent review into how the issue was handled. The SFA has referred a specific aspect to its compliance officer. For all of these reasons, we also do not support the letter from the SPFL calling for a further independent review.

Your Board believes our game faces a choice.  We either continue to spend significant sums of money and huge reserves of time and energy to challenge already lengthy and detailed legal advice.  Or, we can focus on doing all we can to invest in the future of our Club and the wider game to improve our sport, and ensure there can be no repeat of the issues raised

We prefer the latter option - working to ensure that in the future our game is fairer and more open, and has the potential to secure greater commercial income to fund further improvement for the longer term.

Scottish football is finally emerging from a period of significant turbulence, which has damaged the sport, into a much more exciting future. While we know this is a divisive issue that will never be resolved to the satisfaction of all supporters, we cannot allow it to divert us from the future or to keep us mired in the past.

It is the view of your Board that we should focus 100% on a brighter future for Hibernian, and for the game. All of our energy will be used trying to bring future success to our own club, and to working together to create a future that all of our supporters can be proud of, on and off the pitch.

Fair fucks to Hibs for that 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,716]

So where is this Bheast integrity now they've been proven lying bastards?

[plumbGER 24,518]

5 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said:

The SFA has referred a specific aspect to its compliance officer. For all of these reasons, we also do not support the letter from the SPFL calling for a further independent review.

Wonder what they mean here?

Could this lead to the disrepute charge they bastards so deserve?

[SteveEarle 9,745]

There's a bit of me that would welcome an independent review of the way we were handled.  The fact that so many don't want this review makes me think it was the kangaroo court we all thought it was and Christ only knows what would come out in the wash.  Shower of pricks the lot of them!

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,716]

Just now, plumbGER said:

Wonder what they mean here?

Could this lead to the disrepute charge they bastards so deserve?

It's something to do with info the club / Whyte gave that came up in his court case. That's what the Compliance Officer is looking into. Fuck knows what specifically or to what extent.

[Gman36 3,455]

Keevin's on radio snyde there saying, "if no other club wants to do anything about it, it's up to sellik to make the next step" ..... Fuck sake man let it go. 

Absolutely insane the effort some folk are going to keep this going.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,716]

1 minute ago, SteveEarle said:

There's a bit of me that would welcome an independent review of the way we were handled.  The fact that so many don't want this review makes me think it was the kangaroo court we all thought it was and Christ only knows what would come out in the wash.  Shower of pricks the lot of them!

Stop with the "independent" stuff. Can't and won't happen in Scottish football.

That is not the agenda.

There is no desire for this, or to look into seized monies or illegalities of5 way agreements.

This is about looking to punish us further.

[STRUTH82 813]

Love the frothing mess the opposition fans are in just now! This extends beyond the bheasts 

[dummiesoot 16,005]

11 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said:

Hibs statement

Hibernian supporters have contacted the Club directly, and via their two elected Non-Executive Directors, to enquire as to the Club’s position regarding Rangers, HMRC and the use of EBTs.

The Board has discussed the matter at successive Board meetings, and has come to a unanimous view. The Club had intended to make this known earlier, but a variety of factors, not least the need to focus on and conclude Hibernian business during the transfer window, delayed this.

Your Board fully understands the concerns of supporters regarding this issue, on all sides of the argument.

During the past six years, the matter has been interrogated by the highest courts in the land, by the SFA, and by the SPFL. In recent weeks, both the SPFL and SFA have taken extensive legal advice which does not support or encourage taking further action.

The lengthy and detailed explanation of the SPFL legal advice (July 26th 2017) makes clear that this matter has now been thoroughly examined by some of Scotland’s keenest legal minds, and their opinion is that – given the rules which applied at that time - no additional sanctions could be retrospectively applied. Similar legal views have been obtained by the SFA. Both organisations have looked at the issue and at potential sanctions, and have received strong and clear legal advice.

The SPFL – whilst accepting that no additional sanctions can be retrospectively applied – wants an independent review into how the issue was handled. The SFA has referred a specific aspect to its compliance officer. For all of these reasons, we also do not support the letter from the SPFL calling for a further independent review.

Your Board believes our game faces a choice.  We either continue to spend significant sums of money and huge reserves of time and energy to challenge already lengthy and detailed legal advice.  Or, we can focus on doing all we can to invest in the future of our Club and the wider game to improve our sport, and ensure there can be no repeat of the issues raised

We prefer the latter option - working to ensure that in the future our game is fairer and more open, and has the potential to secure greater commercial income to fund further improvement for the longer term.

Scottish football is finally emerging from a period of significant turbulence, which has damaged the sport, into a much more exciting future. While we know this is a divisive issue that will never be resolved to the satisfaction of all supporters, we cannot allow it to divert us from the future or to keep us mired in the past.

It is the view of your Board that we should focus 100% on a brighter future for Hibernian, and for the game. All of our energy will be used trying to bring future success to our own club, and to working together to create a future that all of our supporters can be proud of, on and off the pitch.

Well done Hibs fans 

[FlippinEck 3,705]

 

6 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

Wonder what they mean here?

Could this lead to the disrepute charge they bastards so deserve?

Wonder if its anything to do with the fact the SFA knew craig whyte was witholding PAYE tax from August and did fuck all about it

[Escobar 13,676]

Fuck praising Hibs man they're absolute worst cunts. 

[SteveEarle 9,745]

1 minute ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Stop with the "independent" stuff. Can't and won't happen in Scottish football.

That is not the agenda.

There is no desire for this, or to look into seized monies or illegalities of5 way agreements.

This is about looking to punish us further.

If that's the case then fair enough but we all know it was a shambles and maybe a 'review' might prove it to be.  One way or another it needs to be finalised and put to bed.

[K.A.I 36,183]

7 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

Wonder what they mean here?

Could this lead to the disrepute charge they bastards so deserve?

Pretty sure it's to do with our UEFA licence in 2011 

[K.A.I 36,183]

1 minute ago, fanaticCR said:

Fuck praising Hibs man they're absolute worst cunts. 

You just look like a bitter dick if you refuse to give any credit where it's due - it doesn't mean they aren't scummy bastards 

[dummiesoot 16,005]

1 minute ago, fanaticCR said:

Fuck praising Hibs man they're absolute worst cunts. 

The first set of fans to say 'drop it' damn right I will praise them, hate them but does not stop me praising them for this statement.

[eskbankloyal 19,446]

That hibs statement is a game changer IMO. 

If I was Rangers I would sit back and let a few more clubs do the same (they will) then go all guns blazing and make reference to all the statements from member clubs. Job done. 

[Alves70 393]

That's Hibs, Hearts, Killie and Aberdeen all coming out and saying move on.

Peado fc take note.

 

 

[chris182 6,291]

That cunt Gollum HATES us. On Sportsound now, he has asked why there is no review about 12 different times in 12 different ways.

Fuck him

[Gman36 3,455]

It wouldn't put it past liewell to try and pay off a few teams down the leagues to come out and say they want a review.