Jump to content

The problem is pure and simply financial


BlueBearz1990

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

9 minutes ago, City_of_Blue said:

Good post OP.

I said earlier, Pedro has been financially hamstrung and I'm convinced he would recruit better if he wasn't forced to buy a whole new team for relative pennies.

Other teams managers seem to do ok because they don't have the pressure of having to win every game.

Proper strong investment will get us some world class players who have the right attitude and steel to handle the pressures of playing for Rangers.

Over to you Dave King. No more bullshit.

Sadly most of the bullshit these days is from supporters, namely the Pedro haters and the Tav and Fod lovers. Conclusion, we remain also rans playing for second place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Amac9 said:

£2m on Pena. £1m on Dorrans. £1.5m on Herrera. £1.5m on Cardoso. Money wasted.

It's to do with quality and finding good players. Dembele cost them nothing, Griffiths cost £1m, Sinclair was hardly ground breaking  money at £4m. Yet we continually to buy a load of shite.

glad you said that  we have spent far more than any other team in the league even celtic have not spent much although i realise they have a bigger wage bill  we have wasted money on rubbish  of the buys pedro has made  i only rate jack and moralos the rest of his foreign army are shit  we could not even beat thistle over 2 90 min games

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not purely financial. How stupid are some people? 

It's a big part of not being able to compete with celtic, but what about his tactics, coaching, methods? or the fact we can't win 3 games in Scotland or get past a mid-table Luxembourg team in Europe? our finances blow that lot both Luxumbourg and the Scottish dross outwith celtic out of the water so what's the excuse for that?

So no it's not purely financial - although it's the perfect excuse for the people who continue to wrap Pedro in cotton wool.

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Amac9 said:

£2m on Pena. £1m on Dorrans. £1.5m on Herrera. £1.5m on Cardoso. Money wasted.

It's to do with quality and finding good players. Dembele cost them nothing, Griffiths cost £1m, Sinclair was hardly ground breaking  money at £4m. Yet we continually to buy a load of shite.

fucking hell

dembele and sinclairs wages probably covered our back 4's plus keepers wage, anycunt can find god players its affording their wages thats the issue, the tarriers are spending well over 30million a year in player wages, id be surprised if their midfield 5 didnt cost the same in wages as our starting 11 does

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billscott said:

glad you said that  we have spent far more than any other team in the league even celtic have not spent much although i realise they have a bigger wage bill  we have wasted money on rubbish  of the buys pedro has made  i only rate jack and moralos the rest of his foreign army are shit  we could not even beat thistle over 2 90 min games

tarriers spent nearly 6million on 2 midfielders, thats after going unbeaten in a season domestically, nobody can compete with that

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

It's not purely financial. How stupid are some people? 

It's a big part of not being able to compete with celtic, but what about his tactics, coaching, methods? or the fact we can't win 3 games in Scotland or get past a mid-table Luxembourg team in Europe? our finances blow that lot both Luxumbourg and the Scottish dross outwith celtic out of the water so what's the excuse for that?

So no it's not purely financial - although it's the perfect excuse for the people who continue to wrap Pedro in cotton wool.

Maybe Graeme Murty was on 100k a week when he got a result at the piggery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

Sadly most of the bullshit these days is from supporters, namely the Pedro haters and the Tav and Fod lovers. Conclusion, we remain also rans playing for second place.

Agreed.

I posted this on Fod a few days ago after hearing he signed a new contract:

"He is a decent goalkeeper. But in the long term and where we want to go as a club and get back to, we will need way more than a decent goalkeeper."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jose Mourinho or any of the top class managers in England and Europe would only improve this current squad performance by 25% max. It's quality that's the problem and quality equals cash. We have neither. So it's fighting for 2nd and maybe a Cup run, that's the best we can hope for sadly. But as fans we can continue to support as usual, because the Catholics still hate the fact that we are around, they truly thought we were a goner. So sing it loud wear the colours, because whatever they say, the cunts fucking hate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He spent £2M or £3M on Pena, for fuck's sake. :lol:

Gordon, Lustig, Boyata, Armstrong, Rogic, Forrest, McGregor, Simunovic, Griffiths & even Roberts were part of the side/squad that struggled to the 15/16 SPL title in-front of a celtic Park with its top tier closed.

They spent £4M on Sinclair, but as I said, we've spent up to £3M on fucking Pena. We've also paid good salaries for Barton, Kranjcar, Alves & Dorrans.

What we need is a manager who inspires and instills confidence; Caixinha does the absolute opposite and that blame falls on the boards lap.

Yes, they're wealthier than us, but the Scottish Premier League can be won without going all Abu Dhabi, for fuck's sake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

It's not purely financial. How stupid are some people? 

It's a big part of not being able to compete with celtic, but what about his tactics, coaching, methods? or the fact we can't win 3 games in Scotland or get past a mid-table Luxembourg team in Europe? our finances blow that lot both Luxumbourg and the Scottish dross outwith celtic out of the water so what's the excuse for that?

So no it's not purely financial - although it's the perfect excuse for the people who continue to wrap Pedro in cotton wool.

It the current context it is actually.

The scum are where they are because of money. They can buy and pay far better than all the teams in this backwater put together.

Then there is the footballing standard in this backwater. Outwith the scum, all teams are geared up for the Scottish game and is it therefore any surprise that we, the sheep and StJ were unceremoniously pumped out of Europe's token prequalifiers by no marks?

The world of football has well moved on, whereas outwith the scum in this backwater, the rest remain in a timewarp and with this board, we shall remain well stuck in it. The goat and camel herders from Kazak and Azerbejan must laugh their cocks off when a Scottish team comes out the hat. Such great footballing nations they are, not, whilst we are exactly what? Worse than fucking goat herders. Well the fact is, we are!

So we get Jose M in tomorrow, on the same bugdet that Dembele, Broon and Sinclair probably earn in wages, so what do we win? The answer is sweet fuck all.

There is absolutely nothing to be gained nor accurate in constantly winging on about, well we can't beat the other teams. The answer to that is simply because, we recruit mediocrity just like the rest and whilst we may pay more in inflated wages, they remain mediocrity and with mediocrity comes inconsistency. 

It is as simple as that.

We go nowhere without the funding to match the quality of the scum and that is the heart of the matter.

All the winging and removing of Pedro will make not one jot of a difference until the board fund a true title challenge, so it aint hapening and inconsistency will be the watch word.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

It the current context it is actually.

The scum are where they are because of money. They can buy and pay far better than all the teams in this backwater put together.

Then there is the footballing standard in this backwater. Outwith the scum, all teams are geared up for the Scottish game and is it therefore any surprise that we, the sheep and StJ were unceremoniously pumped out of Europe's token prequalifiers by no marks?

The world of football has well moved on, whereas outwith the scum in this backwater, the rest remain in a timewarp and with this board, we shall remain well stuck in it. The goat and camel herders from Kazak and Azerbejan must laugh their cocks off when a Scottish team comes out the hat. Such great footballing nations they are, not, whilst we are exactly what? Worse than fucking goat herders. Well the fact is, we are!

So we get Jose M in tomorrow, on the same bugdet that Dembele, Broon and Sinclair probably earn in wages, so what do we win? The answer is sweet fuck all.

There is absolutely nothing to be gained nor accurate in constantly winging on about, well we can't beat the other teams. The answer to that is simply because, we recruit mediocrity just like the rest and whilst we may pay more in inflated wages, they remain mediocrity and with mediocrity comes inconsistency. 

It is as simple as that.

We go nowhere without the funding to match the quality of the scum and that is the heart of the matter.

All the winging and removing of Pedro will make not one jot of a difference until the board fund a true title challenge, so it aint hapening and inconsistency will be the watch word.

 

You mention context at the start, but here's the context never mind challenging for the title (I agree with you until the board show ambition we can forget it) but the next best thing is to put up a fight, qualify for Europe, finish second, maybe even win a domestic cup - why not aim for that first in a walk before we can run mantra and let us build? ... we can't even win 3 games in Scotland under Pedro and that's fuck-all to do with King and the board 

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly why pedro was chosen. we cant match them financially at the minute. Does anyone actually think we'll bring in mccinness and he'll magically beat the scum with a third of the budget?

Pedro was picked because he opens up an untapped market. To bring in players of the same quality you could get from the championship at a quarter the price. 

this isnt a shit at glory where a bunch of cunts rise above and win the champions league. Its real life. Its not even fuckkng football anymore. its a game of monopoly. whoever has the most money rules the roost. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally for me the two c***ts most to blame for where or club is at are Murray and Whyte. I know this is going over old ground but these two rats fu**ed us over and left them with unchallenged entry into the CL over the last 5 years.

The nonce have taken in probably £50m plus from Europe since 2012 while we have probably lost that amount from not being in Europe.

Every trace of that rat Murrays name should be permanently removed from Ibrox and Auchenhowie.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Money is at the root of it. When they got rid of the Norwegian dud, they went and spent big on Rodgers who might be a prick but he's improved them considerably.

We need significant investment in both the playing and management staff. There's been nothing forthcoming under this joke of a board to suggest they are capable of providing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, City_of_Blue said:

Good post OP.

I said earlier, Pedro has been financially hamstrung and I'm convinced he would recruit better if he wasn't forced to buy a whole new team for relative pennies.

Other teams managers seem to do ok because they don't have the pressure of having to win every game.

Proper strong investment will get us some world class players who have the right attitude and steel to handle the pressures of playing for Rangers.

Over to you Dave King. No more bullshit.

No team in Scotland can afford world class players

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, theclothmonster said:

If its all about the money how did we finish behind Aberdeen last season and look like doing so this season too? Struggling to get results against pishy teams who have a fraction of our budget but aye its all about the financials. 

It's a massive red herring mate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, theclothmonster said:

If its all about the money how did we finish behind Aberdeen last season and look like doing so this season too? Struggling to get results against pishy teams who have a fraction of our budget but aye its all about the financials. 

This all day long. Using the OP's logic then we should be a shoe-in for 2nd. At this rate we'll be lucky to qualify for Europe!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 21 April 2024 14:00 Until 16:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hearts
      Hampden Park
      Scottish Cup

×
×
  • Create New...