Impartial mhedia experts!

[Blue Avenger 22,567]

Firstly, I am not inviting anyone into giving the daily rhabid's site hit's, but only to reinforce a point in not doing the hate filled mhedia's job for them, but of course by all means have a look, if you have the need. I ventured on to the site to see how balanced the reporting was after our 4-1 victory and the scum's dysfunctional draw and I wasn't surprised........

So the taig infested mhedia continue in their campaign of hate in doing their utmost to destabilise our club, with the latest article in a long line, from one Gordon Waddell again ringing out his own unique brand of demonising propaganda. It all reads perfect sense, if you are gullible enough.

Now it appears to be a thinly veiled attempt at calling on Mark Allen to sack our manager, on the basis of an "if" Pedro has let his dressing room slip that far from his grasp then their is no retrieving it.

This spinless muckraker didn't even have the courage to leave out the if, so once again a piece of shit stirring at it's finest to meddle in the affairs of our club and a nice piece of propaganda to make sure some of the shite sticks, knowing some of the gullible among us will salivitate over it. Job done. This arrogant bastard must think we are all such fools as he is fucking green looking to fall for this shite.

The last thing Allen needs is another rhabid loving bastard telling him how to do his job, and whilst Waddell is at it, he goes on to say how the board made the DOF appointment the wrong way round, so he could pick his own man. Just to add more poison to the ingredients. Is it any coincidence they point this out now?

Now our board may be many things, but they are not such stupid cunts to have that no mark cunt to infer they didn't do their job right.

Just another thinly veiled attempt to undermine the club. In the bigger scheme of things, this assembly line of poison does nothing to attract the investment we badly need and just all to do with the toxification of our brand to prevent any.

Waddell is just another a cunt, in a long line of cunts along who wish to see us dead.

Scan this taig infested mhedia site and you find not one negative story on the scum. Nothing about their dismal performance against hivs, but plenty of negativity on our 4-1 victory over the Accies. God forbid if the scum lost, there would be a tidal wave against us, just to deflect away from them. They don't even try to hide it anymore.

We are well aware of the exact reason for these articles and none of it is for our good health and well being, so as tempting as an article maybe, or as plausible the article may seem, those among us who are tempted to piggy back such articles because it happens to fall in line with a personal view, then please think again about what you are about to do, because it that is exactly the author's objective.

In this particular one, the mhedia are well aware of the divided opinion on Pedro, but they don't stop there, lets try and poison the mind of our latest employee and have him complete the job for them. 

By all means criticise when it's merited, but please not at the behest of hate filled excuses of journos. Don't let ourselves to be so gullible and easily picked off.

In summary, in his very cowardly and thinly veiled opinion, we can do fuck all all right, with him setting about having our manager sacked, telling our latest employee how to do his job, our board being incompetent and lastly demonising our brand in an attempt to stave of investors. It may even all be true, but this is our club and our board will do the telling and not some hate filled no mark with a broken pencil.

Let's not do their job for them. Time to close ranks.

 

 

 

[theiconicman 2,975]

TLDR version

media are (still) cunts. 

 

[theiconicman 2,975]

Btw

are you Traynor without his spellchecker or does he pay you to write this pish?

[buster. 1,114]

You had to hear Sportsound to believe it.

Derek 'usually of the it's all about results mantra' Ferguson was concentrating on how poor Rangers had been against Hamilton.

He took it so far that even Richard Gordon felt obliged to point out that we had actually won the game, 1-4.

 

When we play well but don't win,....it's all about results.

When we win but don't play that well,....it's all about a 'less than convincing performance'.

-----------------------

Aberdeen get KO'd from the League Cup by Motherwell but beat them in a League match a few days later

General Media reaction = McInnes is a master technician who knows how to turn things around.

In exactly the same circumstances......How would they have reacted had that been Pedro/Rangers ?

[backup 4,724]

23 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

Firstly, I am not inviting anyone into giving the daily rhabid's site hit's, but only to reinforce a point in not doing the hate filled mhedia's job for them, but of course by all means have a look, if you have the need. I ventured on to the site to see how balanced the reporting was after our 4-1 victory and the scum's dysfunctional draw and I wasn't surprised........

So the taig infested mhedia continue in their campaign of hate in doing their utmost to destabilise our club, with the latest article in a long line, from one Gordon Waddell again ringing out his own unique brand of demonising propaganda. It all reads perfect sense, if you are gullible enough.

Now it appears to be a thinly veiled attempt at calling on Mark Allen to sack our manager, on the basis of an "if" Pedro has let his dressing room slip that far from his grasp then their is no retrieving it.

This spinless muckraker didn't even have the courage to leave out the if, so once again a piece of shit stirring at it's finest to meddle in the affairs of our club and a nice piece of propaganda to make sure some of the shite sticks, knowing some of the gullible among us will salivitate over it. Job done. This arrogant bastard must think we are all such fools as he is fucking green looking to fall for this shite.

The last thing Allen needs is another rhabid loving bastard telling him how to do his job, and whilst Waddell is at it, he goes on to say how the board made the DOF appointment the wrong way round, so he could pick his own man. Just to add more poison to the ingredients. Is it any coincidence they point this out now?

Now our board may be many things, but they are not such stupid cunts to have that no mark cunt to infer they didn't do their job right.

Just another thinly veiled attempt to undermine the club. In the bigger scheme of things, this assembly line of poison does nothing to attract the investment we badly need and just all to do with the toxification of our brand to prevent any.

Waddell is just another a cunt, in a long line of cunts along who wish to see us dead.

Scan this taig infested mhedia site and you find not one negative story on the scum. Nothing about their dismal performance against hivs, but plenty of negativity on our 4-1 victory over the Accies. God forbid if the scum lost, there would be a tidal wave against us, just to deflect away from them. They don't even try to hide it anymore.

We are well aware of the exact reason for these articles and none of it is for our good health and well being, so as tempting as an article maybe, or as plausible the article may seem, those among us who are tempted to piggy back such articles because it happens to fall in line with a personal view, then please think again about what you are about to do, because it that is exactly the author's objective.

In this particular one, the mhedia are well aware of the divided opinion on Pedro, but they don't stop there, lets try and poison the mind of our latest employee and have him complete the job for them. 

By all means criticise when it's merited, but please not at the behest of hate filled excuses of journos. Don't let ourselves to be so gullible and easily picked off.

In summary, in his very cowardly and thinly veiled opinion, we can do fuck all all right, with him setting about having our manager sacked, telling our latest employee how to do his job, our board being incompetent and lastly demonising our brand in an attempt to stave of investors. It may even all be true, but this is our club and our board will do the telling and not some hate filled no mark with a broken pencil.

Let's not do their job for them. Time to close ranks.

 

 

 

fill your boots,a prime suspect?

 

http://www.BOYCOTT THIS LINK/sport/football/football-news/Rangers-interim-chairman-paul-murray-5287851.amp

[buster. 1,114]

18 minutes ago, backup said:

fill your boots,a prime suspect?

 

http://www.BOYCOTT THIS LINK/sport/football/football-news/Rangers-interim-chairman-paul-murray-5287851.amp

If we want to be accurate regards to detail re. facts/timing then it has to be said that this refers to how the DR generally reported on at least a good part of the 'spiv robbing bastard years'.

In effect, they were used as a conduit to get anti-spiv stories out there in an effort to balance Toxic Jack/MH work to the contrary. It's fair to say that some of the louder voices on here at the time, were pro-spiv and hated the DR for their direction at that time.

The DR was prepared to do so mainly for commercial reasons for the newspaper and personal ambition re. Jackson.

Time moves on, circumstances change and the relationship/attitudes will develop in new directions. Since then, mainly in a negative way.

[Malkster 4,873]

surely the title is an oxymoron  

[Getstiffed 8,863]

24 minutes ago, buster. said:

If we want to be accurate regards to detail re. facts/timing then it has to be said that this refers to how the DR generally reported on at least a good part of the 'spiv robbing bastard years'.

In effect, they were used as a conduit to get anti-spiv stories out there in an effort to balance Toxic Jack/MH work to the contrary. It's fair to say that some of the louder voices on here at the time, were pro-spiv and hated the DR for their direction at that time.

The DR was prepared to do so mainly for commercial reasons for the newspaper and personal ambition re. Jackson.

Time moves on, circumstances change and the relationship/attitudes will develop in new directions. Since then, mainly in a negative way.

No, most of us hated the Record already because of the shite they've been printing about us for a decade.

Their reporting on the spivs wasn't about helping get rid of them, it was to point out how blatantly we were getting arse fucked and having a good laugh at us over it.

[Siam69 26,863]

Mhedia

Cunts that put 'h' in everything need shot, especially on a Rangers forum. 

[buster. 1,114]

Just now, Getstiffed said:

No, most of us hated the Record already because of the shite they've been printing about us for a decade.

Their reporting on the spivs wasn't about helping get rid of them, it was to point out how blatantly we were getting arse fucked and having a good laugh at us over it.

No, they weren't doing it for the good of Rangers. I've already said the newspaper did it for commercial reasons and the main reporter for personal ambition. However, the fact is that they did it and they were at the time used in a mutually beneficial relationship, as an important conduit in what was an ongoing struggle against spiv robbing bastards.

 

[bikerblue 1,716]

I only read that because you have tits

[TEFTONG 60,072]

1 hour ago, Siam69 said:

Mhedia

Cunts that put 'h' in everything need shot, especially on a Rangers forum. 

Is that not a wee bit of an over reaction there my friend..???

[K.A.I 36,183]

1 hour ago, buster. said:

If we want to be accurate regards to detail re. facts/timing then it has to be said that this refers to how the DR generally reported on at least a good part of the 'spiv robbing bastard years'.

In effect, they were used as a conduit to get anti-spiv stories out there in an effort to balance Toxic Jack/MH work to the contrary. It's fair to say that some of the louder voices on here at the time, were pro-spiv and hated the DR for their direction at that time.

The DR was prepared to do so mainly for commercial reasons for the newspaper and personal ambition re. Jackson.

Time moves on, circumstances change and the relationship/attitudes will develop in new directions. Since then, mainly in a negative way.

Nah not buying that because at the same time the news paper had a concerted campaign against Loyalists/unionists within the Rangers context around that same time they had front pagers blaming Rangers fans for violence at George Square after the referendum result, employed Jonny McFarlane to print numerous articles the same as official Rangers blogger and also that stupid wee cow that got assaulted at orange walk who was in a gang fight and had no business at the green gave her taig family from Govan front pagers trying to get walk stopped 

nothing courageous about the bastards and anyone from Rangers saying so should have kicked down the marble staircase it's always been a scum paper even then - their coverage on the Rats was because it was a massive story no more no less 

[Getstiffed 8,863]

1 hour ago, buster. said:

No, they weren't doing it for the good of Rangers. I've already said the newspaper did it for commercial reasons and the main reporter for personal ambition. However, the fact is that they did it and they were at the time used in a mutually beneficial relationship, as an important conduit in what was an ongoing struggle against spiv robbing bastards.

 

And that somehow justifies congratulating a newspaper that even at that point had printed some despicable stuff about our club and our support?

[eejay the dj 31,964]

2 hours ago, Blue Avenger said:

Firstly, I am not inviting anyone into giving the daily rhabid's site hit's, but only to reinforce a point in not doing the hate filled mhedia's job for them, but of course by all means have a look, if you have the need. I ventured on to the site to see how balanced the reporting was after our 4-1 victory and the scum's dysfunctional draw and I wasn't surprised........

So the taig infested mhedia continue in their campaign of hate in doing their utmost to destabilise our club, with the latest article in a long line, from one Gordon Waddell again ringing out his own unique brand of demonising propaganda. It all reads perfect sense, if you are gullible enough.

Now it appears to be a thinly veiled attempt at calling on Mark Allen to sack our manager, on the basis of an "if" Pedro has let his dressing room slip that far from his grasp then their is no retrieving it.

This spinless muckraker didn't even have the courage to leave out the if, so once again a piece of shit stirring at it's finest to meddle in the affairs of our club and a nice piece of propaganda to make sure some of the shite sticks, knowing some of the gullible among us will salivitate over it. Job done. This arrogant bastard must think we are all such fools as he is fucking green looking to fall for this shite.

The last thing Allen needs is another rhabid loving bastard telling him how to do his job, and whilst Waddell is at it, he goes on to say how the board made the DOF appointment the wrong way round, so he could pick his own man. Just to add more poison to the ingredients. Is it any coincidence they point this out now?

Now our board may be many things, but they are not such stupid cunts to have that no mark cunt to infer they didn't do their job right.

Just another thinly veiled attempt to undermine the club. In the bigger scheme of things, this assembly line of poison does nothing to attract the investment we badly need and just all to do with the toxification of our brand to prevent any.

Waddell is just another a cunt, in a long line of cunts along who wish to see us dead.

Scan this taig infested mhedia site and you find not one negative story on the scum. Nothing about their dismal performance against hivs, but plenty of negativity on our 4-1 victory over the Accies. God forbid if the scum lost, there would be a tidal wave against us, just to deflect away from them. They don't even try to hide it anymore.

We are well aware of the exact reason for these articles and none of it is for our good health and well being, so as tempting as an article maybe, or as plausible the article may seem, those among us who are tempted to piggy back such articles because it happens to fall in line with a personal view, then please think again about what you are about to do, because it that is exactly the author's objective.

In this particular one, the mhedia are well aware of the divided opinion on Pedro, but they don't stop there, lets try and poison the mind of our latest employee and have him complete the job for them. 

By all means criticise when it's merited, but please not at the behest of hate filled excuses of journos. Don't let ourselves to be so gullible and easily picked off.

In summary, in his very cowardly and thinly veiled opinion, we can do fuck all all right, with him setting about having our manager sacked, telling our latest employee how to do his job, our board being incompetent and lastly demonising our brand in an attempt to stave of investors. It may even all be true, but this is our club and our board will do the telling and not some hate filled no mark with a broken pencil.

Let's not do their job for them. Time to close ranks.

 

 

 

You are wasting your time with some of the apathetic , brainless ones on here mate .

Make you fucking sick with some of these so called Rangers fans

[.Williamson. 82,009]

Why do people quote the fucking op?

We know what you're replying to, we aren't retards

[eejay the dj 31,964]

13 minutes ago, TEFTONG said:

Is that not a wee bit of an over reaction there my friend..???

It's expected from him . One of the most apathetic on here

[.Williamson. 82,009]

3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

It's expected from him . One of the most apathetic on here

He's right though, putting an "h" in words is taig like

[murzo 7,446]

5 minutes ago, .Williamson. said:

Why do people quote the fucking op?

We know what you're replying to, we aren't retards

Is this the same op that wrote war and peace the other day  that people quoted to reply, scrolling down for about 15 days to read a one sentence reply

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,619]

Dirty bheasts.

[eejay the dj 31,964]

3 minutes ago, .Williamson. said:

He's right though, putting an "h" in words is taig like

I don't give any of these things a single thought

The taig like patter just makes me weep .

Do you think the beggars excuse each other of being bears and use other terms  . Do they fuck mate .

The ultimate insult for any passionate   bear . Even if it is , a little thing .

I wish to fuck it would stop but it won't

 

[eejay the dj 31,964]

1 hour ago, buster. said:

If we want to be accurate regards to detail re. facts/timing then it has to be said that this refers to how the DR generally reported on at least a good part of the 'spiv robbing bastard years'.

In effect, they were used as a conduit to get anti-spiv stories out there in an effort to balance Toxic Jack/MH work to the contrary. It's fair to say that some of the louder voices on here at the time, were pro-spiv and hated the DR for their direction at that time.

The DR was prepared to do so mainly for commercial reasons for the newspaper and personal ambition re. Jackson.

Time moves on, circumstances change and the relationship/attitudes will develop in new directions. Since then, mainly in a negative way.

For that headline alone . He should be shot at dawn .

Piece of prick . I'm sure 69 is a family member

[TEFTONG 60,072]

43 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

It's expected from him . One of the most apathetic on here

That particular poster is Brand New in my opinion..

Hence the reason I was surprised at his annoyance at something so trivial as regards an H...

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

A fair few on here have been giving the taig media (look no “h” for all you gentle souls) a helping hand this week. 

[BlueSuedeSambas 53,752]

59 minutes ago, .Williamson. said:

Why do people quote the fucking op?

We know what you're replying to, we aren't retards

Nothing worse than cunts who quote a massive post to simply reply with "good post" or "??". It's infuriated me for years