Ryan Jack Red

[Prso's headband 35,343]

The narrative being pushed that Ryan Jack is a dirty player now he’s at Rangers is mental. 

Jack is an old school midfielder who gives everything in the tackle and shites out of nothing. He’s being punished for not being a shitebag. 

Why is there no retrospective action on McLeans tackle on Holt? He could’ve done his achilies quite easily with that tackle. And as for Ryan Jack should’ve levitated his foot out the way, what was stopping McLean not running his studs down Holts heel? Gravity? Holt already played the pass

[nelsonRFC82 305]

2 minutes ago, Dazzler said:

The clip of the McLean tackle in this thread is worse imho. 

Done now though, no point wasting energy on it. 

Both McLean's & Shinnie's were worse, Shinnie went on to commit 3 or 4 fouls after his booking including one where Collum chose to just blow for HT rather than deal with the foul! One of the things that jumps out at me when people have used the reasoning if the Jack challenge was from an Aberdeen player we would be screaming for a red...well there were two worse and barely a peep mentioned!

[bringonthbarca 25]

Not surprised. They were never going to over turn 3/4. They have to save face and back their refereees. 

 

Sad but true. 

 

Need some actual referees. 

[Bad Robot 21,139]

Cunts protecting one of their own as they would have been left wide open if it was rescinded 

[Prso's headband 35,343]

“Unnatural position”

[graeme_4 34,353]

Not surprised. Can see why a red was given, even if I think it’s a yellow. 

They were never going to overturn 3 out of 4. 

[MacBoyd 5,436]

Was unlucky but it was never getting rescinded. Will be a loss.

[dougie76 15,356]

Fucking joke but we know what we have been up against for a while, fuck the lot of them.

[Sparkle 53,529]

It was never going to be overturned. 

[quabba 440]

21 minutes ago, nelsonRFC82 said:

Both McLean's & Shinnie's were worse, Shinnie went on to commit 3 or 4 fouls after his booking including one where Collum chose to just blow for HT rather than deal with the foul! One of the things that jumps out at me when people have used the reasoning if the Jack challenge was from an Aberdeen player we would be screaming for a red...well there were two worse and barely a peep mentioned!

this, Mclean's was a shocker and could have did Holt's ligaments or worse, not even spoken to

[CM 1234 68]

Thought it was a howlin decision but also thought we were completely wasting our time appealing it 

[Smell the hotdog 4,015]

In hindsight we should have just took the one game ban and let him miss Saturday.

Missing Jack away to Hibs is a big blow.

[offminorthreat 1,463]

disgraceful

[GOAT 30,449]

Of course it wasn't getting overturned, it WAS a red card.

[nelsonRFC82 305]

2 minutes ago, Smell the hotdog said:

In hindsight we should have just took the one game ban and let him miss Saturday.

Missing Jack away to Hibs is a big blow.

That wasn't option, the 3 game ban was his original suspension.

[Turnberry18 3,204]

Time for Barjonas to step up. That was never a red.

[offminorthreat 1,463]

I would love to see someone from the club make a statement about the standard of refereeing as a result of this. It is honestly one of the most staggering decisions i have ever seen.

[Smell the hotdog 4,015]

10 minutes ago, nelsonRFC82 said:

That wasn't option, the 3 game ban was his original suspension.

Ah stand corrected then I thought it was original one game ban.

[Supersonic 4,654]

The 2 match ban for the red starts immediately but the "extra" game he'll be banned for due to the multiple reds doesn't kick in for 14 days - is that right?

So, he misses County and hibs but he doesn't miss the St. Johnstone game? 

[Hoss 267]

It was a red card.

[Chineseboy 1,563]

58 minutes ago, Hoss said:

It was a red card.

No it wasn't 

[Mr Soprano 13,964]

1 hour ago, Captain Hilts said:

I don't think it was a red but he still gave Collum the excuse he was aching for.

By passing a ball ?

Fucking geez peace.

[1690tamRFC 5,001]

As much as everycunt knew they would uphold the red this time  it’s a fucking shocking decision. Corrupt bastards. 

[Domthenbud 899]

1 hour ago, GOAT said:

Of course it wasn't getting overturned, it WAS a red card.

Maybe it was. It looked a bad one. I believe only Ryan Jack can tell us if it merited a red. However I honestly think we are fighting on the wrong front.  Several years ago the tims created a strike and they seem to have done ok out of it since. Broon against Ross county, broon v us(elbows), Stokes against us(how did he get away with the blatent fouls), oops I forgot lennon is now the manager. Think he might have created that strike the last time he managed here. Cardosa's broken nose, Shinnie in the sheep game, McLean in the same game. Jacks 2 rescinded reds caused us to drop points. Just a few examples of where we are and obviously why we are frustrated. The club have a duty to protect the status of our club and this could be helped by asking for clarification backed up by video footage. There is plenty out there. I used to be in the dignified silence camp but fuck it, goose and gander. 

[ianferguson 2,619]

Slow motion & May shitting himself were the deciding factors here but i had no doubt it was going to be 3rd time unlucky, no way could they quash 3 reds. Shinnie and Mclean done worst and both deliberate, only a mind reader could tell if Jacks was but he's sadly become a marked man and any robust challenge will now see a card.