SACK THE BOARD

[Dlydon81 245]

2 hours ago, plumbGER said:

Play good-well done Murty and the players, maybe Warburton had an eye for a player after all.....

Play shite-sack the board.

If you are good enough to beat Aberdeen twice, Hearts, Hibs and Ross County then you should be good enough to beat St. Johnstone at Ibrox, no excuses, Murty and they players let us down today.

I’ve been calling for us to take a stand elsewhere in this forum. Even immediately after the two Aberdeen games.

youre clearly one of the ‘4 in a row’ celebrants and I hate to burst that bubble...........however -

How we beat Hibs I will never know - they outplayed us.

A big question mark over the Aberdeen games too given the mcinnes reports and the knock on impact on them.  If we played them now they would likely beat us more times than not. 

Ross County are second bottom of the league.

hearts are pish!

 

 

[Dlydon81 245]

2 hours ago, bil 65 said:

The only viable option is a fans buy out

With 80m shares in issue and the debt - that will be difficult. We need the fans to show the enthusiasm for change to attract  proper investment.

[Dlydon81 245]

2 hours ago, Bluenose88 said:

You do know they were just overwhelmingly voted back in. 

Not by the fans! The fans turn on them properly and other shareholders will take note and the board themselves will realise that their position is untenable.

We seem reluctant to use our powers when their are ‘Rangers men’ in place - that is part of our problem.

[ForeverAndEver 71,344]

5 minutes ago, Dlydon81 said:

I’ve been calling for us to take a stand elsewhere in this forum. Even immediately after the two Aberdeen games.

youre clearly one of the ‘4 in a row’ celebrants and I hate to burst that bubble...........however -

How we beat Hibs I will never know - they outplayed us.

A big question mark over the Aberdeen games too given the mcinnes reports and the knock on impact on them.  If we played them now they would likely beat us more times than not. 

Ross County are second bottom of the league.

hearts are pish!

 

 

We scored two goals, they scored one

[mrmojorisin 13,608]

And replace them with who?

[Dlydon81 245]

13 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

who's said such a thing certainly no me in the post you've quoted

Im referring to what fans that haven’t already written off this season are thinking.  

There are two possibilities 

- they think we are good enough to win as is, or

- they think we are going to strengthen to compete the second half of the season.

if you don’t believe any of the above two scenarios then writing off this seasonshouldn’t be a ‘toss up’

[Dlydon81 245]

7 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

We scored two goals, they scored one

Thanks for the valuable contribution to debate!

[ForeverAndEver 71,344]

Just now, Dlydon81 said:

Thanks for the valuable contribution to debate!

There is no debate, that is how we won.

[plumbGER 24,518]

1 hour ago, Dlydon81 said:

youre clearly one of the ‘4 in a row’ celebrants and I hate to burst that bubble...........however -

Go on, quote me a single time when i have said anything remotely like that.....i'll log on at lunch time to see how you get on.

[Bluenose88 132]

5 hours ago, K.A.I said:

Yes because they hold the rights, collectively to millions of shares ala votes 

but you are still correct in what you say - any resignations will be on their terms no-one else’s which is the problem - the same problem we had with the last lot until their hostile takeover 

we need another hostile takeover it seems but we need this mob to release the shares do we not? 

The recent resolutions put even greater control in their hands regarding who might get any new shares to be released. 

Rather than weaken their hold on the club it strengthens it. 

The one question none of this answers though is just who would they be replaced with?  I’m just not sure there are queues of people lining up to replace them.

Any new share issues might go some way to shedding light on whether there are indeed alternatives to the incumbents or we are to rely on their backing alone for the foreseeable future.  

 

[K.A.I 36,183]

Just now, Bluenose88 said:

The recent resolutions put even greater control in their hands regarding who might get any new shares to be released. 

Rather than weaken their hold on the club it strengthens it. 

The one question none of this answers though is just who would they be replaced with?  I’m just not sure there are queues of people lining up to replace them.

Any new share issues might go some way to shedding light on whether there are indeed alternatives to the incumbents or we are to rely on their backing alone for the foreseeable future.  

 

Again you are correct 

but even though there’s no one lining up to replace them that doesn’t you can’t not want them gone

I want us to win the champions league but just because it won’t happen it doesn’t mean your wrong for wanting it to happen 

this shower of cunts have fucked up so bad they’ve made our brand toxic 

it’s on them 

[Bluenose88 132]

3 hours ago, Dlydon81 said:

Not by the fans! The fans turn on them properly and other shareholders will take note and the board themselves will realise that their position is untenable.

We seem reluctant to use our powers when their are ‘Rangers men’ in place - that is part of our problem.

You are 100% right in that the fans can show their displeasure and cause pause for the board and probably enough to enact some change.

However, it remains an unanswered question, just who would replace them?  

The next round of share issues might reveal any potential candidates or just serve to strengthen the current shareholders grip.

 

[Bluenose88 132]

5 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

Again you are correct 

but even though there’s no one lining up to replace them that doesn’t you can’t not want them gone

I want us to win the champions league but just because it won’t happen it doesn’t mean your wrong for wanting it to happen 

this shower of cunts have fucked up so bad they’ve made our brand toxic 

it’s on them 

I think that’s fair enough. 

I’d like to think there will be a shake up of board members by the time the next AGM rolls round. If they succeed in getting fresh investment, from new sources, then I suspect those folks will demand their voice on the board. Then there might be opportunity to replace some incumbents. 

As fans we just want to win games and trophies, but when our club relies on investment from the public domain, and those investors are not necessarily fans the priorities get skewed from our perspective.

What is interesting in all of this is that while the incumbents were overwhelmingly voted back in, there were in fact 28% of shareholders who did not vote. That’s a huge number. 

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

I'm not blaming the board for the teams result, I'm blaming the board for allowing Rangers players to be attacked on the field, for allowing Doncaster to maintain his job whilst lying to continue an agenda, the mccinnes debacle. 

They think all they need to do is put out a statement to appease us and forget about it, I've had enough. 

[Jack The Flipper 5,936]

6 hours ago, plumbGER said:

Yes i can believe it wouldn't, that's fine and you are entitled to your opinion of course you are.

You can blame the board all you like but that's now 16 points we have dropped at Ibrox, after recent results on our travels how can you blame the board for our abject home performances against mediocre opposition?  You simply can't, the players have let us down time and time again.

Yeah sure 

Who is to blame for countless player failures? The manager - end of.

Who is to blame for countless manager failures? The board - end of.

There is no scapegoat in sight, the board have well and truly fucked us and there is no escaping that. They are not fit for purpose and must be replaced or we are completely fucked as a club.

[Jack The Flipper 5,936]

4 hours ago, mrmojorisin said:

And replace them with who?

Who are we to know/decide that?

We are low level stakeholders, all we can do is show our displeasure and campaign for change. This is the only option open to us. This “oh but there’s no one to replace them with” or “who do you think should replace them” has always been a ridiculous argument. 

[eejay the dj 31,964]

7 hours ago, Dlydon81 said:

This is deliberately in the Bears Den as we need every fan to unite to provoke proper and sustainable change.

Every fan should be howling SACK THE BOARD throughout the next home game. We should be protesting outside the front door before and after every Home game.

we were good at protesting against the football authorities but we never take a stand against the charlatans running our club until it is too late 

SACK THE BOARD

PS I know this will never take off as too many of our fan base feel entitled and just expect people to deliver for them.  Until we realise the old order isn’t what it used to be we are doomed to mediocrity!

Your idea is the right one mate 

I feel your frustration 

It will probably take another 5/6 wasted years .By that time .Beggars will be on 11/12 

If it's one thing I've learned over the years 

Rangers fans are a mixture of Proud ,arrogant ,complacent, apathetic  .They will never be seen to doing anything " the taig way "

This will always suit the people that run our club

King and Murray were absolutely geniuses when they railroaded control back from Ashley 

They used every bit of previous experience under DM to pull it off 

They got their security blanket by telling us about transparency and initiating the group that was going to fight our corner 

Cleverly turning that whole scenario around .They now hide behind that ..Just like DM used the assembly

As long as our club have these guys are in control .It's going to be utter misery being a bear 

Just like the Kelly's back in the day .They need smoked out

Sadly no bears would ever lower themselves to that kind of "taig like " behaviour   

We are fucked. Only the dreamers,greedy bastards/shareholders  will think things will change 

Me being a rank and file supporter since I was 9 , can  only hope it's all a bad dream 

[plumbGER 24,518]

37 minutes ago, Jack The Flipper said:

Yeah sure 

Who is to blame for countless player failures? The manager - end of.

Who is to blame for countless manager failures? The board - end of.

There is no scapegoat in sight, the board have well and truly fucked us and there is no escaping that. They are not fit for purpose and must be replaced or we are completely fucked as a club.

How can you blame the board for Windass not being able to head the ball down the way? Or Tav not being able to finish from the 6 yard box because he wants an extra touch?

The players and manager take collective responsibility for letting us down on the pitch, they have shown they are able but not shown any consistency with it and sometimes looking that they are lacking effort.

Now i know the board have to shoulder some responsibility, i have criticised them plenty, but i am not going to blame them every time those fucking players let us down.

[Perth_Campsie_Ger 17,973]

7 hours ago, bil 65 said:

The only viable option is a fans buy out

And then what? Have Houston as chairman? @govanblue organising the transfer kitty fundraiser? We need serious investment, fan ownership sounds great but the reality of it is if you want to win things you need serious investors. It might work for the likes of Motherwell but I couldn't see it working for us

[Perth_Campsie_Ger 17,973]

9 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

How can you blame the board for Windass not being able to head the ball down the way? Or Tav not being able to finish from the 6 yard box because he wants an extra touch?

The players and manager take collective responsibility for letting us down on the pitch, they have shown they are able but not shown any consistency with it and sometimes looking that they are lacking effort.

Now i know the board have to shoulder some responsibility, i have criticised them plenty, but i am not going to blame them every time those fucking players let us down.

It's common knowledge that Paul Murray picks the team, he uses football manager for tactics too then tells that puppet Murty what to do.

Clearly you are not ITK

[plumbGER 24,518]

2 minutes ago, Perth_Campsie_Ger said:

It's common knowledge that Paul Murray picks the team, he uses football manager for tactics too then tells that puppet Murty what to do.

Clearly you are not ITK

Paul Murray would have kept that header down with his hair, easy, maybe he can invite the players to his new re-modelled office to teach them things.

[Vision 16,725]

7 hours ago, duffy2391 said:

Googled ‘good chairmen’ for some ideas and this thing came up. 

He’s certainly impressive.

Reminds me of the torture scene in "Casino Royale". Maybe that's what King needs, a knoted rope aff the baws until he releases some funds.

[Perth_Campsie_Ger 17,973]

1 minute ago, plumbGER said:

Paul Murray would have kept that header down with his hair, easy, maybe he can invite the players to his new re-modelled office to teach them things.

The way he gels his hair dictates how we set up, forward means we go with an attacking mentality, to the side is balanced and back is defensive

[Dan Deacon 55,107]

People might have reasons for wanting the board out but there's fuck all happened at board level since Wednesday that caused the players to be utter useless bastards and perform as they did yesterday. 

[plumbGER 24,518]

8 minutes ago, Perth_Campsie_Ger said:

The way he gels his hair dictates how we set up, forward means we go with an attacking mentality, to the side is balanced and back is defensive