Jump to content

***The Official Scum vs Rangers Thread***


Lloyd

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The only part that we are “light years behind them” is in consistency. We can match anyone when we lift ourselves ie Sheep x2, Hearts away, Hibs away. But we can’t seem to do it week in week out. If we could, we would be right on top of them. 

 

Well done today Rangers, should’ve been a win and not many were predicting that at lunchtime. ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Rangers. We should have won. Yes they had a few chances as well but ours were clearer cut and we really should have got 3 points. Delighted with Bates and Tav in particular. And of course Murty. Great to hear the scum fans booing at the end. WATP!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SwallowsHisOwnSpunk said:

Player Ratings—

 

Foderingham—7.5  9

 

Tavernier—9  9

Bates—8 9

Wilson—8.5 9

John—7.5 8

 

Candeias—7 8

Holt—8 8

McCrorie—6 (Didn’t really get involved today) 7

Niko—4 5

Windass—6.5 6

 

Morelos—6.5 (Poor finishing but was a handful all game for their defence) 7.5

1

added in bold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel a bit empty after that one. All we lacked was the goal and we deserved nothing more than to get it.

Played out a perfect game plan off the ball and our shape remained rigid throughout which stifled them to nothing more than a couple passes together in phases.

It was a great watch but not coming away with a win is really deflating.

All we need are a few match winners. Quality that can join the first team and provide the kind of spark that would turn a great performance into the perfect win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tav is sketchy a times in defence but imo, if you put tav in any of our teams pre 2012 i reckon he would be regarded as a very good player. Our midfield lose the battle more times than not and that exposes our backline. If you added 4 or 5 players of real quality guys like tav and windass would be fine playing off them.

Definitely should hold on to tav or make sure we get a decent fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JR said:

The only part that we are “light years behind them” is in consistency. We can match anyone when we lift ourselves ie Sheep x2, Hearts away, Hibs away. But we can’t seem to do it week in week out. If we could, we would be right on top of them. 

 

Well done today Rangers, should’ve been a win and not many were predicting that at lunchtime. ??

Thats the issue. We have a lot of guys who play well 1 in 3 games. When it all goes in sync, we do well. 

Consitency costs ££

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...