BILLYBOY50 1,638 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I posted the other night that Jamie had signed I wasn't told about it being on loan though. But even then people were still getting their knickers in a twist let's just see how he does on loan but I have a feeling he is going to surprise a lot of people. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Band of Brothers 10,303 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 hour ago, BILLYBOY50 said: I posted the other night that Jamie had signed I wasn't told about it being on loan though. But even then people were still getting their knickers in a twist let's just see how he does on loan but I have a feeling he is going to surprise a lot of people. Well you did your best from what you got told and at least he is here so you were rite but remember we have fuds at the helm big chap! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don54 25,517 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Sky Sports website a few mins ago Jamie Murphy has joined Rangers on loan from Brighton until the end of the season when the Scottish Premiership side can exercise an option to make the move permanent. The 28-year-old is a boyhood Rangers fan and is set to become the club's second arrival of the transfer window, having already landed Sean Goss on loan from QPR. Rangers wanted to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton would prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gersandy 594 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 8 minutes ago, Don54 said: Sky Sports website a few mins ago Jamie Murphy has joined Rangers on loan from Brighton until the end of the season when the Scottish Premiership side can exercise an option to make the move permanent. The 28-year-old is a boyhood Rangers fan and is set to become the club's second arrival of the transfer window, having already landed Sean Goss on loan from QPR. Rangers wanted to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton would prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. Risky. Guy could score 15 goals from now until may. Brighton day they want £2.5m for such a player. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 People making all sorts of excuses blaming injuries and Brighton and the eclipse of the moon. It's really quite simple in my opinion. The well is getting close to dry. We don't have millions to fork out. I actually think it's a brilliant move we haven't paid a few. But it's not through any sense of good business on our Boards part. It's simply that these guys in their current state can't take us any further forward. Welcome to the club Jamie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don54 25,517 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 10 minutes ago, gersandy said: Risky. Guy could score 15 goals from now until may. Brighton day they want £2.5m for such a player. Maybe, but his stats say unlikely - 341 Apps. 81 Goals Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 4 hours ago, BridgeIsBlue said: If the Easdales couldn't cough up £1m for a player, so they just sat back and waited for ST renewals so the fans could pay for the transfer ... Pathetic. The Easdales didn't cough up 1m for a player, they did however provide us with a loan and if I remember rightly we sold our bright young prospect at the time Lewis Macleod to pay them back. Anyway we didn't need 1 million quid for players, we had Ashley and he was only to happy to provide us with some young talented Newcastle players. Just a pity 4 out of the 5 young players were either injured or too ill to play football. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 4 hours ago, Blue Avenger said: Haven't a clue. Do they have issues with king? I could get to like them! Now back on topic. King demanded a loan! Was this a good planned tactic, or is he just skint (for us that is.) You haven't a clue who Sonsofwilliam1 and shankillblue1 were, so why didn't you then ask PQ why he brought them up in a post aimed at yourself? Back on topic, not sure if getting Murphy on loan was a good planned tactic or we're just skint, could well be a combination of both, I'm just happy we've added a decent player to the squad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Looks like I was right then - loan recalls and new loans all round. There's no money, simple as and I would expect an EGM to be called before summer, although c1872 getting a seat on the board may stave this off for now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 hour ago, gersandy said: Risky. Guy could score 15 goals from now until may. Brighton day they want £2.5m for such a player. The fee has been fixed already. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionsAgain 1,373 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Surely fake? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Real Ranger said: The Easdales didn't cough up 1m for a player, they did however provide us with a loan and if I remember rightly we sold our bright young prospect at the time Lewis Macleod to pay them back. Anyway we didn't need 1 million quid for players, we had Ashley and he was only to happy to provide us with some young talented Newcastle players. Just a pity 4 out of the 5 young players were either injured or too ill to play football. The player who was 'too ill' was only deemed to be so in Scotland, he would have been free to play on loan in England. Funny how that happened and he is now at Motherwell! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyc06 6,915 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 The circus goes on, who the fuck announces signings at twenty to one in the morning other than deadline day!! In relation to the OP, yes the board are a fucking shambles!! This has worked out really well for us though, presuming we aren’t paying his wages or at least all of his wages! Means we get the benefit of him for 6 months without paying for him! Also what if he’s an absolute flop, we get to say no thanks without wasting the million on him! Frightening that we can’t even spend £1m without it risking the signing of others though! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amato 3,016 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, scottyc06 said: The circus goes on, who the fuck announces signings at twenty to one in the morning other than deadline day!! In relation to the OP, yes the board are a fucking shambles!! This has worked out really well for us though, presuming we aren’t paying his wages or at least all of his wages! Means we get the benefit of him for 6 months without paying for him! Also what if he’s an absolute flop, we get to say no thanks without wasting the million on him! Frightening that we can’t even spend £1m without it risking the signing of others though! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heshootshescores 1,904 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 There can be multiple reasons why the deal was structured as it was. But the end result is that we have secured the services of a very good player. FFS chill. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd 10,756 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 16 hours ago, backup said: Absolutely no argument can be put up against that, hearing they tried to pull the walker stroke again ! What’s this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedrono1 92 Posted January 7, 2018 Author Share Posted January 7, 2018 21 minutes ago, Siwel said: What’s this? Iirc trying to undervalue the pkayer to get in cheap but backfired on us i think Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd 10,756 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Pedrono1 said: Iirc trying to undervalue the pkayer to get in cheap but backfired on us i think Wasn’t sure if he was meaning something a bit more sinister or not like @K.A.I alluded to yesterday. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 hour ago, RFC Eagle said: The player who was 'too ill' was only deemed to be so in Scotland, he would have been free to play on loan in England. Funny how that happened and he is now at Motherwell! He was only deemed to ill to play in Scotland, is that meant to be a defence of this loan signing? He didn't play for Newcastle again, we recieved him in January without a medical and it wasn't until mid November before he played at senior level again after going on loan to Coventry. Do explain what was funny about how that happened. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 26 minutes ago, Real Ranger said: He was only deemed to ill to play in Scotland, is that meant to be a defence of this loan signing? He didn't play for Newcastle again, we recieved him in January without a medical and it wasn't until mid November before he played at senior level again after going on loan to Coventry. Do explain what was funny about how that happened. I just find it odd that his medical issue meant he could play in England but not just a few miles up the road in Scotland. He wasn't in Newcastles plans so no surprise he didn't play at senior level for them. More questioning how the rules in Scotland always seem to be a problem for Rangers. Not sure why you thought it was a 'defence' of anything?? The nature of the illness, not the severity, was the issue. He was fit and ready to play but wasn't allowed to even train with Rangers. He was not 'too ill' to play. I would surmise (as a microbiologist) that he had a latent viral infection which was symptomless but showed up in blood tests. Obviously the exact infection is a matter of confidentiality but comparing lists published by the respective FAs would shed light. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss 267 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 hours ago, ChampionsAgain said: Surely fake? Depends... where did you see it?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,810 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 19 hours ago, Pedrono1 said: Feel free to move were appropriate but its starting to annoy me that our club apparently goes for a player ie jamie Murphy all looks well just few finishing touches before deal is completed then reports saying its hit the buffer because we cant afford it yet our fucktards of a biard sanctions the loan singing of pena to that Mexican mob but we still need to pay 13k of his wages ffs this board continue to make fuck up after fuck up and us more and nore a laughing stock in football fucking enough is enough get them tae fuck Where is the Pena information coming from? I haven't seen that reported. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedrono1 92 Posted January 7, 2018 Author Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, JCDBigBear said: Where is the Pena information coming from? I haven't seen that reported. You not read papers? You seem to be the ONLY one not to see this Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,810 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 4 hours ago, Real Ranger said: The Easdales didn't cough up 1m for a player, they did however provide us with a loan and if I remember rightly we sold our bright young prospect at the time Lewis Macleod to pay them back. I don't believe that part is correct. Macleod wanted to go and the Easdales tried to keep him at Ibrox. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,810 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Pedrono1 said: You not read papers? You seem to be the ONLY one not to see this No I don't read the papers as they are full of crap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.