K.A.I 36,183 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, Gustav said: It's not a backfire, mine was the first one and no matter how many replies each one gets that will eat away at him The one with the most replies stays ma manz Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavieMacRFC 850 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Welcome to a True Blue but what a fuckan joke the board are making us, disclose the in's and out's or just fuck off , total shambles and we need too see some transparency here for this and the future. The board are cunts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbscotty12 3,560 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Marky. said: Also we can assess him in the loan period. If he's on decent wages and is now quite up to the task we can leave it and save ourselves the wages. Not that I think it will come to that, this is a strangely risk free method though. I think we probably need to buy regardless his form. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd 10,756 Posted January 7, 2018 Author Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, K.A.I said: Good. That's one concern alieveated ... now for the matter of being skint and a circus... 3 minutes ago, The Godfather said: Awaiting the ST money because they will invest fuck all of their own cash. 3 minutes ago, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said: Yeah I know happy we do but not good enough that it's a loan at this stage. The board clearly couldn't afford to pay Brighton up front. Worrying times. 6 minutes ago, .Williamson. said: Horrendous how skint we are. Good to get him in for 6 months though Rangers were willing to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. However, only Rangers will have the option to sign Jamie at that time. thats from the official site no idea why they wouldn’t want it done this window. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Shambles Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marky. 6,923 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, jjbscotty12 said: I think we probably need to buy regardless his form. Fair enough, in that case it is very odd. How difficult are we to deal with ffs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,428 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, K.A.I said: The one with the most replies stays ma manz Not bothered if it stays, he knows I made this one first, that's all that matters Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Siwel said: Rangers were willing to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. However, only Rangers will have the option to sign Jamie at that time. thats from the official site no idea why they wouldn’t want it done this window. Ehh that just raises even more questions in that case, so Brighton are hedging their bets and could want him back? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,102 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, K.A.I said: Good. That's one concern alieveated ... now for the matter of being skint and a circus... Not really, Brighton don’t have to sell to us. If they get relegated I can imagine they’ll likely want him back in their team. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Gustav said: Not bothered if it stays, he knows I made this one first, that's all that matters Mind I used to be admin mate so I know how it works and what the criteria is for instances like these Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC RYAN 2,967 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, K.A.I said: Ehh that just raises even more questions in that case, so Brighton are hedging their bets and could want him back? Really weird, could it mean if Brighton get relegated they will want players like him next season ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElBufalo20 7,875 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Siwel said: Rangers were willing to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. However, only Rangers will have the option to sign Jamie at that time. thats from the official site no idea why they wouldn’t want it done this window. Sure they are. Came from our end that ridiculous quote. Seems forced. Already confirmed we are the only ones signing him in the summer so why would Brighton not want the money now. The board trying to be to clever here and back firing with made up shite Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,428 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, K.A.I said: Mind I used to be admin mate so I know how it works and what the criteria is for instances like these Aye and you were sacked for incompetence It's nothing to do with the site anyway, it's to do with Floyd knowing he was 2nd quickest Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fergie_6 1,078 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Siwel said: Rangers were willing to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. However, only Rangers will have the option to sign Jamie at that time. thats from the official site no idea why they wouldn’t want it done this window. they can use it to help get dumbelle, we wont let them sign murphy etc ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, RFC RYAN said: Really weird, could it mean if Brighton get relegated they will want players like him next season ? That's a good point because he was their main man last season in the Championship so they could go back down that tried and tested route. Don't get me wrong I'm delighted he's finally here but too much doesn't add up no matter what perspective/POV you come at it with Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyBear 13 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 10 minutes ago, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said: Exactly a shambles. Having to rely on us paying our season tickets rather than the board dipping into their pockets to sign someone. Where the shambles with this deal? We've pissed millions against the wall for Pena, Herrera and the rest of the duds Pedro brought in. FFS, the Board do something sensible for a change and your not happy?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd 10,756 Posted January 7, 2018 Author Share Posted January 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, K.A.I said: Ehh that just raises even more questions in that case, so Brighton are hedging their bets and could want him back? The tweet says that it’s a fixed price and we’re guarranteed to sign him tho. Also his goodbye tweets don’t sound to me like a guy who’ll be going back there in the summer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, RustyBear said: Where the shambles with this deal? We've pissed millions against the wall for Pena, Herrera and the rest of the duds Pedro brought in. FFS, the Board do something sensible for a change and your not happy?? If that's you definition of sensible I'd hate to see what you consider crazy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 81,997 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, Siwel said: Rangers were willing to sign the former Motherwell player on a long-term deal during the January window but Brighton prefer to wait until the end of the season before making the switch permanent. However, only Rangers will have the option to sign Jamie at that time. thats from the official site no idea why they wouldn’t want it done this window. That makes literally fuck all sense Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC RYAN 2,967 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd 10,756 Posted January 7, 2018 Author Share Posted January 7, 2018 . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbscotty12 3,560 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, RFC RYAN said: Superb welcome Jamie Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, Siwel said: The tweet says that it’s a fixed price and we’re guarranteed to sign him tho. Also his goodbye tweets don’t sound to me like a guy who’ll be going back there in the summer. and the Brighton one says "expected" so who's telling the truth? before you make you mind up consider our lot and the statements and output our media lot put out ... they never mislead anyone, do they? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said: Sure they are. Came from our end that ridiculous quote. Seems forced. Already confirmed we are the only ones signing him in the summer so why would Brighton not want the money now. The board trying to be to clever here and back firing with made up shite Bang on the money. We don't have the money and Brighton are taking no risks in not getting it. We don't pay up come summer, he is their player. Good signing all the same. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyBear 13 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, K.A.I said: If that's you definition of sensible I'd hate to see what you consider crazy So, what's the problem with this deal? You happy that we've spunked more than 3 million on two Mexicans that have played fewer games between them than Murphy will probably play on loan? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.