UEFA Top 20 Best Supported Clubs In Europe - Rangers At Number 13

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

3 minutes ago, FSM said:

Well, there's been laughs, there's been tears, there's been great debate and there's been the usual pointless drivel from Gustav. What a thread.

I've just taken a bow by the way.

Better check @Bronzy aint behind you.

[hammer93 15,057]

1 hour ago, FSM said:

Tims at number 8? Clearly the Seville calculator has been given a new set of batteries.

 

Full story here

 

 

How can they have schalke behind the tims when schalke have an 5k bigger average?

Seville calculation right enough mefinks  

[Davy Vandenbroucke 26,146]

2 minutes ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

Better check @Bronzy aint behind you.

Too late

 

[FSM 20,892]

3 minutes ago, hammer93 said:

How can they have schalke behind the tims when schalke have an 5k bigger average?

Seville calculation right enough mefinks  

Us and the tim's figures are based on 19 home games it seems, but the German teams are based on 17 home games.

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

49 minutes ago, HuistraHairDo said:

like to see any team in the world take as many fans to one game as we did in Manchester.

So fuck the list WATP. 

Add in the fans who went to Ibrox and those who just went to the pub or stayed at home. We must have at least a couple of million "fans" in Scotland alone. 

That government petition a couple of years back was well fiddled with. 30,000 within a couple of days, then nothing. Still pisses me off. 

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,519]

Just now, FSM said:

You're not excused.

 

y

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,519]

Just now, FSM said:

Well, there's been laughs, there's been tears, there's been great debate and there's been the usual pointless drivel from Gustav. What a thread.

I've just taken a bow by the way.

What's wrong

[hammer93 15,057]

2 minutes ago, FSM said:

Us and the tim's figures are based on 19 home games it seems, but the German teams are based on 17 home games.

I noticed we were above Hamburg also

Base the figures against how successful the team you support is in that season and it puts it in a different perspective 

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

1 minute ago, hammer93 said:

I noticed we were above Hamburg also

Base the figures against how successful the team you support is in that season and it puts it in a different perspective 

Aye, there would be no catching West Ham!

[FSM 20,892]

2 minutes ago, hammer93 said:

I noticed we were above Hamburg also

Base the figures against how successful the team you support is in that season and it puts it in a different perspective 

Not really sure what you mean mate. The tone made it sound like you were trying to say something positive about us, but we won fuck all last season so I'm now confused.

[hammer93 15,057]

Point I'm making is there are a lot of impressive averages from teams who aren't really successful, ie Hamburg, West Ham and Arsenal.....even ourselves are playing 2nd fiddle at the moment but yet the fans keep going through the turnstiles, i suppose I'm alluding to your Bayerns, Reals and Barelonas who are used to competing and winning every season (maybe not Real this season) if you get my drift

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

20 minutes ago, hammer93 said:

How can they have schalke behind the tims when schalke have an 5k bigger average?

Seville calculation right enough mefinks  

Less games played in the German league. Only 18 teams in it. They have a huge winter break. 

[big blue Fin 3,724]

1 hour ago, FSM said:

Aye, well, the 2017/18 season isn't over yet you see.....

16/17 is though.

[William Scott 24]

Imagine if that table was some sort of European Elite League. 

[hammer93 15,057]

3 minutes ago, Redwhiteandblue said:

Less games played in the German league. Only 18 teams in it. They have a huge winter break. 

Yip FSM pointed it out?

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

13 minutes ago, FSM said:

Not really sure what you mean mate. The tone made it sound like you were trying to say something positive about us, but we won fuck all last season so I'm now confused.

I know the English teams and the nappy rippers automatically add in all season tickets whether they turn up or not, then add in individual ticket sales whether they turn up or not to help with the financial fair play rules. It should be taken from the health and safety fire head count and would be better if it was over a 5yr period. The Fenians wouldn't even make the top 50 if that was the case over the past 5yr. 

[FSM 20,892]

8 minutes ago, big blue Fin said:

16/17 is though.

Thanks mate, you're the first one to point this out.

[bluenose244 2,618]

Would love to see this added with our away following we would be a lot higher. 

[MoOnMAn69R 16]

1 hour ago, FSM said:

Tims at number 8? Clearly the Seville calculator has been given a new set of batteries.

 

Full story here

 

 

Are these numbers similar to the way tims count in dembelle dollars cause thats the only way the smelly kiddie fiddlers have a better attendance record than us!

[big blue Fin 3,724]

2 minutes ago, FSM said:

Thanks mate, you're the first one to point this out.

Four pages, who's got the time to look.

 

#lazycuntsloyal

[ianb1547 3,767]

I like keeping up to date with 2yr old news

[rangerman 89]

what the hell has happened to ac milan over the years

[Tenerife Bear 1,748]

I think this just magnifies how small Ibrox is and how much we need to progress as a club off the park and give our club and fans the type of arena and capacity they need. 50000 capacity stadia are 10 a penny nowadays. 

[KeyserSoze 14,531]

Bigger stadiums usually have bigger attendances. 

Thats a fact

[FSM 20,892]

3 minutes ago, KeyserSoze said:

Bigger stadiums usually have bigger attendances. 

Thats a fact

Queen's Park.

No way back from this. I expect you to ask admin to delete your account now.