Jump to content

Scottish Football


Recommended Posts

I don't know how anyone can watch the replays of that and come to the conclusion that the lad dived. You see a physical jolt through his body as contact is made.

A lad playing at the level of Inverness CT, they might never get the chance to play in a cup final ever again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, hammer93 said:

We could put a statement like that out there and people in here would still say it wasn't enough 😂😂

It wouldn’t be 

It would be our  1000th time 

Credit to them though .Small club and no supposed power within our game 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hadron Collider said:

and on behalf of the growing number of Scottish football clubs who believe that the SFA disciplinary process is not fit for purpose.

This is encouraging and a long time overdue, the ‘smoke and mirrors system’ that has been allowed to develop (favouring one more than others) needs replaced with a transparent and fair process. Good statement which said so much without actually saying the words...

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, dummiesoot said:

First time I have seen a booking for simulation that was outside the box

 Great statement mind you

they are quite right I said at the time it was never a dive and the lad should never have got a red card  I also said that the goal chalked off for offside was wrong as the gers lad played the ball last  once again the Scottish refs and the judicial system is shown to be rubbish  the Hamilton boys red card was a disgrace as well  at least that has been overturned  we should not be surprised at that decision it was that cunt Clancy who cannot get his red cards out quick enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can. Worms. Open. 

It seems justice will prevail but it'll be interesting what happens next.

 

The Scottish FA’s Chief Executive, Ian Maxwell, has received notification that the tribunal convened to hear the Claim for Wrongful Caution raised by Inverness Caledonian Thistle on behalf of James Keatings failed to implement its duties as per the Judicial Panel Protocol.

Specifically, one of the panel members has advised that, despite raising no concerns throughout the process, they did not undertake their obligations with respect to the consideration of all the available evidence.

While the Fast Track Claims process is by definition an appeal, and therefore not open to further consideration, none the less the Chief Executive and Presidential team, Rod Petrie and Mike Mulraney, are unanimous that the tribunal outcome cannot be considered competent in light of the disclosure from the panel member and that the input from that panel member must be withdrawn.

With that in mind, and only in extremis based on the information provided by the panel member, the determination cannot be considered valid. Therefore, the Judicial Panel Secretary has been instructed to convene a new tribunal and a fresh date will be set in due course.

The initial outcome is rendered invalid by the acknowledgement of a panel member of their failure to dispose of their duties in respect of section 13.13.4 of the Judicial Panel Protocol and, in particular, the following paragraph:

The Determination of the Claim shall be made by the Fast Track Tribunal by examining and deliberating upon: (ii) all of the evidence and submissions delivered by the Claimant in support of the Notice of Claim.

The Scottish FA upholds the independence of the Judicial Panel Protocol but cannot in this instance consider the tribunal verdict competent, based on the admitted failure of a panel member to adhere to the process as outlined.

The panel member in question has subsequently been withdrawn from the pool of potential panel members for all future tribunals

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ger4life_1872 said:

That's a fucking shambles with that appeal , how many other times has that happened 

Their incompetence is incredible.

I wonder if all three have to agree on the decision because surely the other two would have been a majority, assuming they wanted to overturn the card.

This new appeal raises a few questions that surely the media should be looking into.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bears r us said:

Their incompetence is incredible.

I wonder if all three have to agree on the decision because surely the other two would have been a majority, assuming they wanted to overturn the card.

This new appeal raises a few questions that surely the media should be looking into.

 

I'm sure I've read before that all 3 have to agree,  think that was for giving out retrospective red cards but would assume it's the same 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
×
×
  • Create New...