King wants new investors on the board

[RFC Eagle 4,888]

Just now, backup said:

Because he chased her first time for coming up short, well short.

She wasn't that short at the time, he is just trying to squeeze the pips as per usual. 

[thebooler 4,509]

Just now, eskbankloyal said:

Might come back to this post in a week or so 

Spill Esky.

[NamibianBear 1,851]

2 minutes ago, thebooler said:

Getting fed up with it all now.

Every fukkin day we get snippets and rumours, yet not a peep from our Board, Crisis1872, SOS, Houston, Graham, Bomber, or the Marshall Two.

All people who were never off our radars to get King in, and there's no doubting the fact since he arrived, we've gone from one car crash to another, on AND off the park.

We're like a charity for blazer chasers, and it makes me sick.

Personally, I have no wish to here any more lies from any of the ones you mentioned

[backup 4,724]

Just now, RFC Eagle said:

She wasn't that short at the time, he is just trying to squeeze the pips as per usual. 

She was well short, otherwise he wouldn't have chased her.

[backup 4,724]

2 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

Might come back to this post in a week or so 

You should bring money when you come back to it, cos we are going to need it.

[thebooler 4,509]

1 minute ago, NamibianBear said:

Personally, I have no wish to here any more lies from any of the ones you mentioned

That's a good point bud. ?

[eskbankloyal 19,446]

2 minutes ago, backup said:

You should bring money when you come back to it, cos we are going to need it.

Let's see. 

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,519]

People in here desperate for this not to be true  

[Cadman 342]

King would be more likely to try and headhunt Dempster from Hibs than approach someone like Stavely.

[FSM 20,892]

58 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

That would be shit hot

now would you agree King’s a liar?

I don't see the world in black and white, so I'm going to say no. I do agree that he hasn't fulfilled his initial promises (reminiscent of a politician promising the world to get elected, then scaling back on the promises later), but I don't think he deliberately lied to deceive. I don't know the full story obviously, but I do think he probably misjudged the size of the problems at the club and maybe decided to take a more cautious approach once he realised. Would you spunk 30-50 million if you genuinely thought that we might go bust again in a couple of years?

[backup 4,724]

1 minute ago, eskbankloyal said:

Let's see. 

So it's mibees aye mibbees naw, let's see, just like life really.

[big blue Fin 3,724]

1 hour ago, rabc10000 said:

Really don't know what to make of the majority of fans who think he is some sort of fucking messiah

Dog food. Make dog food of the cunts because their all fucking sheep, morons and inbreds to a man, they are an insult to real Rangers fans everywhere.

How anyone can continue to view king as some sort of saviour for this club is beyond me. He cost the club a fortune in lost revenue when he called for the support to starve the previous board of season ticket money, he hated the idea of Ashley taking over, as did the SFA, when Ashley actually has a successful business and the money that could have changed the club's fortunes, king saw us delisted from the Stock Exchange, he's happier down in Liverpool than he is in Glasgow.

He was then, is now and always shall be a lying fucking cunt who took thousands of our fans for a fucking ride and if some of you still can't see it then away and support some other team.

[backup 4,724]

2 minutes ago, FSM said:

I don't see the world in black and white, so I'm going to say no. I do agree that he hasn't fulfilled his initial promises (reminiscent of a politician promising the world to get elected, then scaling back on the promises later), but I don't think he deliberately lied to deceive. I don't know the full story obviously, but I do think he probably misjudged the size of the problems at the club and maybe decided to take a more cautious approach once he realised. Would you spunk 30-50 million if you genuinely thought that we might go bust again in a couple for years?

You don't think king deliberately lied to deceive, you must have missed all his lying and deceiving in courts and in public.

[cushynumber 25,178]

9 hours ago, Blue Avenger said:

So many telling me there were no investors as well.

King is getting to fuck with a bag of swag sooner than later.

Full commercialisation of the business is now achievable with Gerrard. His brand adds value to ours. Gerrard was always a business proposition.

fuck it, I'm all in with BA now.

[Bertent 2,081]

2 minutes ago, FSM said:

I don't see the world in black and white, so I'm going to say no. I do agree that he hasn't fulfilled his initial promises (reminiscent of a politician promising the world to get elected, then scaling back on the promises later), but I don't think he deliberately lied to deceive. I don't know the full story obviously, but I do think he probably misjudged the size of the problems at the club and maybe decided to take a more cautious approach once he realised. Would you spunk 30-50 million if you genuinely thought that we might go bust again in a couple of years?

Daves not a lying criminal he's just not very good at what he does.  Hmmm

[FSM 20,892]

Just now, backup said:

You don't think king lied to deceive, you must have missed all his lying and deceiving in courts and in public.

I was talking specifically about Rangers. Stay on point mate.

[Trooblue 1,973]

I still think that Gerrard's decision  over the next day or so will give us a clear indication about the club's finances.  If he signs a contract, then, presumably, there is a degree of certainty about new investment/investors.  If he doesn't, then it's all been yet more smoke and mirrors from King. 

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,519]

6 minutes ago, FSM said:

I don't see the world in black and white, so I'm going to say no. I do agree that he hasn't fulfilled his initial promises (reminiscent of a politician promising the world to get elected, then scaling back on the promises later), but I don't think he deliberately lied to deceive. I don't know the full story obviously, but I do think he probably misjudged the size of the problems at the club and maybe decided to take a more cautious approach once he realised. Would you spunk 30-50 million if you genuinely thought that we might go bust again in a couple of years?

 you're at it.

[BlueKnight87 17,281]

22 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Some of them are clowns, but a lot of the support didn’t know what to think and just fell into the trap of the old faces and promises of money

I was one of the people who supported king.

At the time I seen Mike Ashley and his board draining us of our resources. We were 1 emegency loan away from Ashley having security over ibrox. That's what made me back king. 

[Big Al 55 9,248]

18 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

Might come back to this post in a week or so 

Where the tease emoji?

[backup 4,724]

4 minutes ago, FSM said:

I was talking specifically about Rangers. Stay on point mate.

So was I, as I said you must have missed all his deceiving and lying.

[Hutton2008 646]

9 hours ago, Blue Avenger said:

So many telling me there were no investors as well.

King is getting to fuck with a bag of swag sooner than later.

Full commercialisation of the business is now achievable with Gerrard. His brand adds value to ours. Gerrard was always a business proposition.

I disagree. Well, I agree about Gerrard adding to the value of the brand. 

But I really don’t think King will go anywhere and I also think his hunt for new investors will bring about two more wealthy to us, paupers in the football world into our club. 

Want to believe there will be change but genuinely see this shit show going on for the long haul

[backup 4,724]

1 minute ago, BlueKnight87 said:

I was one of the people who supported king.

At the time I seen Mike Ashley and his board draining us of our resources. We were 1 emegency loan away from Ashley having security over ibrox. That's what made me back king. 

The bank had security over Ibrox for years, why the sudden horror of anyone else even king having security, assets are there to work for a company.

[gj923 1,457]

14 minutes ago, RFC Eagle said:

Not close to 'getting carried away' as my response mentioned, I highly doubt it will happen. As I have also pointed, out in another post, she is still working on the Newcastle takeover. My post was about:

1) The type of presence I would prefer.

2) The type I would be less happy with.

3) The complete waste of oxygen that Paul Murray has been.

Sorry post was not aimed at you more the fact I can see people getting carried away which is the mo of the current board. I have been saying for ages we should have independent directors who would think long term and in the interests of all shareholders. Murray has funnily enough been a waste of space not like most people did not think that. From his speech about a nomad I cannot remember him saying anything else direct to the support. He has been content to gorge himself on the hospitality that his blazer has afforded him the last few years. Whilst he has not taken a salary you can be sure he has expenses plus the catchet of the position to further his own interests these last few years.

[BlueSuedeSambas 53,775]

21 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

Might come back to this post in a week or so 

You cocktease