Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, Rfc52 said:

Just out of curiosity then how many do you reckon Gerrard helped to renew? 100? 2500? 20,000?

Your behaving like a jilted burd now our opinions on this are different no point knocking the arse out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Smile said:

Your behaving like a jilted burd now our opinions on this are different no point knocking the arse out of it.

I'm not. I'm asking a genuine question about how many season books Gerrard helped renew

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is wrong on so many levels. He’s very overrated IMO. Has the legs to run all day but he rarely pops up with goals or assists. 

McCrorie, Jack and Rossiter (if fit) are good enough to play the position he plays. 

Not to mention he’s a papish bastard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth Rangers are denying they have any interest in McGinn. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

For what it's worth Rangers are denying they have any interest in McGinn. 

:lol:

Must be got the desired 6k renewals. Job done.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, ianferguson said:

Stevie G factor makes it a little more realistic, we'll soon see.

John McGinn apparently hates Rangers.  I don't see how appointing Steven Gerrard changes that.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

For what it's worth Rangers are denying they have any interest in McGinn. 

Thankfully.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

For what it's worth Rangers are denying they have any interest in McGinn. 

As they should.  I don't think there's any chance of him signing a contract with us.  If celtic show any interest at all that's where he'll end up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be against this one. Would cost far too much. We’d be giving money to a club I despise. And we’d be getting a largely overrated player in return. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

For what it's worth Rangers are denying they have any interest in McGinn. 

Thank fuck for that.

We shouldn't even contemplate dealing with HIVs anyway.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TMB said:

As they should.  I don't think there's any chance of him signing a contract with us.  If celtic show any interest at all that's where he'll end up.

Don't think celtic are interested either to be honest. He'll end up down south in the Championship IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sonofbear said:

Thank fuck for that.

We shouldn't even contemplate dealing with HIVs anyway.

 

Agreed. It's just pointless & they'll inevitably win the PR battle around it because of the diddies at our club. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd happily take Harry Cochrane before McGinn better than what we have if we are looking at hearts and hibs for players McGeouch as well could do a job his contract runs out the end of this month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The boy's been overrated since he was in the Championship and getting in Scotland squads.

Last person I want at Ibrox.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Smell the hotdog said:

The boy's been overrated since he was in the Championship and getting in Scotland squads.

Last person I want at Ibrox.

Looks like an advert for a spot cream as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

Don't think celtic are interested either to be honest. He'll end up down south in the Championship IMO.

He’s honestly not even that good, he’s not even the best midfielder at hivs. £5m is a laughable figure for him.

Hope they hold out and lose him for nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Rfc52 said:

I'm not. I'm asking a genuine question about how many season books Gerrard helped renew

Mine 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Smile said:

Looks like an advert for a spot cream as well.

Not a very good one then. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as we'd welcome improvement in all areas of the pitch, central midfield is that last position i'd be looking at just now.

Then you'd need to negotiate with hibs, the thought of which should turn every bears' stomach.

Then when you look at the player himself...... no thanks.

All in all it's a no from me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll end up at the scum for 500k and the junkies will thank them for their professionalism in getting the deal done

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SheriffHood said:

He'll end up at the scum for 500k and the junkies will thank them for their professionalism in getting the deal done

I don't think he would get in their team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't give any club in Scotland £3m of our money. I would class this a bullshit - we will be linked with almost everybody this summer due to Gerrard signing and given this is from the DR, I doubt they know anything about what we do if it doesn't involve Miller or Wallace.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Smile said:

I don't think he would get in their team.

Neither did scott allan, didn't stop them buying him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×