BridgeIsBlue 66,498 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 44 minutes ago, Inigo said: There's so much wrong with what he says. We've had unrestricted and open signing of Catholics since 1989. They threw bananas en-masse at Walters In 1987 so are they all still to be hit with the raving racists stick if we're still to be hit with the sectarian recruiters stick? We signed plenty Catholics before 89 though. Dickie1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post With Heart and Hand 8,949 Posted May 26, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted May 26, 2018 i dont think anyone can argue with the part about excluding 50% of our demographic 140 plus years and we've never had a woman play for us. Disgusting. Coplandbear11, nabeday, bluewhitevanman and 9 others 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakes Pal 5,457 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, With Heart and Hand said: i dont think anyone can argue with the part about excluding 50% of our demographic 140 plus years and we've never had a woman play for us. Disgusting. Do we not have a Ladies team? MattyBlue and Dickie1963 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Proddy 609 Posted May 26, 2018 Author Share Posted May 26, 2018 If we went after him he'd be on Twitter begging the tims for money for his legal fees. Phil mah gob in would start a fundraiser Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar 13,676 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 If the club went to sue him, his arse would collapse and no doubt say he as hacked. AlbertzLoyalRSC and BridgeIsBlue 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 10,584 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 He has a point about "right wing fruitcakes", but someone sue this cunt for what he's said about why we were founded. For the bears responding to him on twitter, would prefer them to stick to the facts about our club and the scum instead of ad hominem arguments about him beating up Ulrika or worse giving him the chance to play the victim card. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSM 20,892 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 2 hours ago, MurrayWilson said: He was a good bit older than 17 when he stood in the Rangers section away to AEK Athens in 1994, there is absolutely no doubt that if Ally hadn't burst him in 1998 he would still support us. What I cant believe is that someone actually still employs the clown. Think that's a bit of a myth tbh. dougie76 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,771 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 So signing catholics is a good thing? I don’t think he gets it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StirlingBear72 476 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 It's fenians that aren't welcome Stan, what a tube. Ibroxric72 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,524 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 36 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: We signed plenty Catholics before 89 though. Yeah, but not in an open, unrestricted way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 33,926 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 46 minutes ago, bluedylan said: Rangers need to grow a backbone here and sue him...at the very least his lies are damaging the club brand worldwide Agreed . Tbh , I think he'd shite it if we threatened him with legal action unless there is a public retraction and apology . We'd probably never hear of him again . But as you say , that requires a bit of backbone . bluedylan 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodRunsBlue 1,303 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 He's a stereotypical black guy. A racist and a sexual predator who beats up women. He spends his time wanking himself off in the bushes. He's the lowest form of life possible and doesn't deserve the oxygen that's wasted on him. If i'm wrong Stan, sue me. Courtyard Bear and The Specky Forum Organiser 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
With Heart and Hand 8,949 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 he talks about us being irrelevant and in the past when the reason celtic was founded hasnt been relevant for over 100 years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 33,926 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Inigo said: Yeah, but not in an open, unrestricted way. I think we did in our early days . Iirc it was after WWI that we introduced that . Inigo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWR1979 1,953 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 He's an attention seeking prick who uses his race as a safety net every time his mouth gets him into trouble. dougie76 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle 53,251 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 38 minutes ago, With Heart and Hand said: 140 plus years and we've never had a woman play for us. Disgusting. Always thought she was quite pretty in a hard paper round sort of way With Heart and Hand 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnbank bear 342 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 That tarrier cunt is just looking for attention!! Nobody has been giving a fuck about him so he’s trying to get back in the spotlight...he would love the club to go after him and get him back on news and papers.. fuckin scumbag Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,524 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 1 minute ago, gmcf said: I think we did in our early days . Iirc it was after WWI that we introduced that . Yeah mate. Bottom line is nobody has a perfect past but some are allowed to move on from it and others are not. gmcf 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markem 7,238 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 He’s never heard of Mark Walters then and the all embracing Celtics treatment of him? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange and Blue 1,173 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 What's this rapist scum bag saying?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 63,948 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 11 minutes ago, BloodRunsBlue said: He's a stereotypical black guy. A racist and a sexual predator who beats up women. He spends his time wanking himself off in the bushes. He's the lowest form of life possible and doesn't deserve the oxygen that's wasted on him. If i'm wrong Stan, sue me. I'm fucking buckled at this AlbertzLoyalRSC, bluewhitevanman, BloodRunsBlue and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BridgeIsBlue 66,498 Posted May 26, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted May 26, 2018 30 minutes ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: He has a point about "right wing fruitcakes", And what point is that exactly? 17 minutes ago, Inigo said: Yeah, but not in an open, unrestricted way. Catholics were still signed though, there was never a sectarian signing policy at Rangers, complete myth. plumbGER, Getstiffed, 1690tamRFC and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,524 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: And what point is that exactly? Catholics were still signed though, there was never a sectarian signing policy at Rangers, complete myth. If it's not open and unrestricted, then it IS a sectarian policy, just not to the absolute extent that some like to suggest. bluedylan 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 8 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: And what point is that exactly? Catholics were still signed though, there was never a sectarian signing policy at Rangers, complete myth. The whole "policy" thing is revisionist history at best. We signed plenty of Catholics but when they decided to start a team (because Brother Wilfred was disgusted at the idea of Irish Catholics playing for and supporting Rangers) they got all the best Catholic players because their communities pressured these young men to only choose them. You can just imagine them being told not to mix with those terrible Protestants. At that point we could have signed more of them but there was only the cluggers left to pick from so why would we? Should we have signed these guys regardless of ability just because they were Catholics? The fact is that its more unacceptable for one of them to play for us to them, than it is to us. And it still is. BridgeIsBlue and dougie76 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
With Heart and Hand 8,949 Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 apparently his twitter account was hacked by the asian ladyboy prostitute he was shagging named Sue Me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.