Jump to content
KWBear

Dave king statement

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, gogzy said:

My Grandad called us The Rangers.  

We're off to see The Rangers score.

Obviously not our official name, but still acceptable IMO.

Pretty sure we had to agree to disagree on this one in a past debate :lol:

Tober yersel up ! Yer Granda isnae a liar !

Scan.thumb.jpg.aa5f41449b3367902d484b9cead3474c.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, gogzy said:

My Grandad called us The Rangers.  

We're off to see The Rangers score.

Obviously not our official name, but still acceptable IMO.

Pretty sure we had to agree to disagree on this one in a past debate :lol:

As I said mate before Idiotup decided he has to be right. 

You want to put THE in front carry on but it’s not our name. 

I say I’m off to see the Rangers game same as I say I’m off to the Pub or I’m going to watch the Liverpool game. 

We should start a Aye Ready or Ready debate that’s always a good one to pass the time. ??

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BLUEDIGNITY said:

Tober yersel up ! Yer Granda isnae a liar !

Scan.thumb.jpg.aa5f41449b3367902d484b9cead3474c.jpg

Do you support a company then. ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Courtyard Bear said:

As I said mate before Idiotup decided he has to be right. 

You want to put THE in front carry on but it’s not our name. 

I say I’m off to see the Rangers game same as I say I’m off to the Pub or I’m going to watch the Liverpool game. 

We should start a Aye Ready or Ready debate that’s always a good one to pass the time. ??

It's Aye Ready :lol:

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

Do you support a company then. ??

Scan.thumb.jpg.16b2c0d4cef7bb0796b5fd0533a2ee85.jpg

You annaw Tober yersel up ! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, gogzy said:

If you start to smell burnt toast......first check the toaster, if it isn't on fire, phone 999 :lol:

we refer to the toaster in babns household as the reserve fag lighter 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The forum header should be changed to THERANGERSMEDIA  actually !

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Rangers - plural.

A Ranger - singular.

?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

O my blootering hell to fuck! It’s The Rangers, wether Glasgow prefixes that is immaterial....deal with it’

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“No matter the days of anxiety that come our way, we shall emerge stronger because of the trials to be overcome. That has been the philosophy of the Rangers since the days of the gallant pioneers.”

:hmmm::sherlock:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody heard when the next phase of our attack on these :wanker: is about to take place???? Ta. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Siwel said:

 

I take it people have the screenshots odlf these pages, since they are checking up? If not is it possible to get a cache of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, VentyFour said:

I take it people have the screenshots odlf these pages, since they are checking up? If not is it possible to get a cache of it?

I dunno what a cache is but no doubt at all there are screenshots of everything.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From NARSA Q&A with Robertson: SR: obvious conflict of interest with MacLennan. We won’t drop it till we get answers.

I wonder what King has in mind to get the answers we all want ??

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is quite an about turn from Jackson given his initial stance over this.

Tom Engish will be feeling quite isolated now given Spiers also gave us backing in his Times column.

Screenshot(35).thumb.png.04955d462e5c7c3250f50ec374e313fc.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, D'Artagnan said:

This is quite an about turn from Jackson given his initial stance over this.

Tom Engish will be feeling quite isolated now given Spiers also gave us backing in his Times column.

Screenshot(35).thumb.png.04955d462e5c7c3250f50ec374e313fc.png

It's through gritted teeth that he has to admit to it. Part of today's article confirming Dave King has a point. 

"Demand he cease or throw the book at him on a charge of disrepute or whatever else is in your power. Because in terms of perception their lack of action points to a guilty conscience.That’s not to say MacLennan has been nobbled by celtic’s biggest shareholder and his long-term business ally.Nor is it confirmation for the conspiracy theorists convinced celtic have grabbed the game in this country by the short and curlies.It also opens the gates to a toxic swamp of whataboutery – especially given the roles Campbell Ogilvie and Gordon Smith once held within the SFA. The truth of the matter is MacLennan’s CV and background in media would most probably have had him on the shortlist for a role at a company like INM whether he was head of the table at the SPFL or not. But that’s not the point either."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/06/2018 at 01:24, gogzy said:

It's Aye Ready :lol:

And anyone that says otherwise are fucking wrong and will be banned , it's the moderators right. :fishing:.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, coopsleftboot said:

Did Ogilvie or Smith have business links with Rangers or a majority shareholder at the time of their employment with the SFA or is this simply a bit of muddying water in a "yous hud your guys in top jobs before an aw" kind of way?  Different situations and I recall the hounding from all and sundry until Smith was driven from his post.

i agree. putting names in because they were associated with rangers in the past is a very different situation to controlling shareholder relationships

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×