Jump to content

Club Statement - Murdoch MacLennan


markem

Recommended Posts

Sorry admin  - it’s already posted . 

——————

Rangers has been informed that the SPFL Board has refused our request for an independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the position and disclosure by its chairman, Murdoch MacLennan, of his appointment to the position of non-executive chairman at Dublin-based Independent News and Media (INM).

It is common knowledge that INM and celtic FC share two significant shareholders in Mr Dermot Desmond and Mr Denis O’Brien. Mr Desmond and Mr O’Brien each have the ability to appoint directors to the Board of INM. These directors are described in INM’s annual report and accounts as not being independent.

It is also clear that, as chairman of a company in the difficult position that INM finds itself, Mr MacLennan will be required to review evidence and materials relating to INM’s dealings with its shareholders, including Mr Desmond and Mr O’Brien. Has Mr MacLennan notified the SPFL chief executive of this conflict? If the chief executive was notified, as he should have been, can he confirm why he did not notify the SPFL Board of this interest?

It is surprising that Mr MacLennan does not recognise and acknowledge that there is clear scope for conflict of interest between the duties owed by him to the SPFL and its shareholders and the duties he now owes to INM and Mr Desmond and Mr O’Brien as INM shareholders. Under the present circumstances no SPFL club can be sure of being properly served.

Our concerns are heightened by the fact that Mr MacLennan has yet to offer an explanation for the very serious public allegations that he used highly inappropriate language when speaking about Rangers while working in the newspaper industry.

In the interests of proper governance, transparency and integrity the SPFL should have agreed to an independent investigation of this extremely serious matter and should not have refused to answer all questions and address the genuine concerns put to them in a formal letter by Rangers.

Now, however, and because there is no route of appeal against this decision, Rangers is left with no alternative but to call for Mr MacLennan to stand down as SPFL chairman. Apart from this being the correct course of action under the circumstances, it would also be the honourable thing to do.

Rangers believes that Mr MacLennan cannot be considered fit and proper to continue in his role as SPFL chairman as he is now obliged to recuse himself from meetings and decision-making processes which could impact on member clubs. The SPFL needs a chairman that can openly participate in all meetings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, islandblue said:

Good statement keep the pressure on Lawell’s placemen

There’s no pressure whatsoever.

Our club cant even follow through with their statement when our own players were attacked. King has no interest to root out the corruption in Scottish football these statements are used by him for underlying issues, to either appease us or hide another court defeat.

That will be the last we will hear about this issue from either him or the fenian Scottish media and yet again the corruption in Scottish football will be allowed to go unheeded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Howsitgoing said:

There’s no pressure whatsoever.

Our club cant even follow through with their statement when our own players were attacked. King has no interest to root out the corruption in Scottish football these statements are used by him for underlying issues, to either appease us or hide another court defeat.

That will be the last we will hear about this issue from either him or the fenian Scottish media and yet again the corruption in Scottish football will be allowed to go unheeded.

It seems that way mate . A few statements here and there when it suits .

No one coming out and facing up to the camera . Now that would be applying pressure in my book

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great statement, keep up the pressure on the taig empire building, let’s drive in a wedge into the cracks that are now appearing to get a level playing field.

looking forward to the next move, well played our board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Neil1418 said:

Great statement, keep up the pressure on the taig empire building, let’s drive in a wedge into the cracks that are now appearing to get a level playing field.

looking forward to the next move, well played our board.

It's clearly not enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

A statemtent here and there is all well and good but what we need is full scale war.

Something like King in a press conferences unequivocally stating that we think they’re all corrupt as fuck and we’re going after them, something that shows them we’re not playing around any more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had to have a wee look about for more on this bam , didn't have to go much further than our own forum

I saw this reported on Sky yesterday , it was just a few pop ups on the football news feed .

However , it does seem the knives are out , and rightly so .

Scan of paper from Virtuoso.

 

11mb6yu.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/07/2018 at 10:16, Howsitgoing said:

There’s no pressure whatsoever.

Our club cant even follow through with their statement when our own players were attacked. King has no interest to root out the corruption in Scottish football these statements are used by him for underlying issues, to either appease us or hide another court defeat.

That will be the last we will hear about this issue from either him or the fenian Scottish media and yet again the corruption in Scottish football will be allowed to go unheeded.

It has been suggested that Paul Murray was the bridge-builder - and not DK. 

Could be correct - as we've seen far more coming from Ibrox since pm disappeared. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎08‎/‎07‎/‎2018 at 10:58, eejay the dj said:

It seems that way mate . A few statements here and there when it suits .

No one coming out and facing up to the camera . Now that would be applying pressure in my book

A written statement isn't applying pressure.  But, if someone read this statement in front of a camera then it would be applying real pressure? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DariuszAdamczuk said:

A statemtent here and there is all well and good but what we need is full scale war.

Something like King in a press conferences unequivocally stating that we think they’re all corrupt as fuck and we’re going after them, something that shows them we’re not playing around any more.

You want a press conference in which Dave King calls for "a full scale war", calls the SPFL "corrupt as fuck", and finishes it off with "we're going after them"?  You think that's reasonable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TMB said:

You want a press conference in which Dave King calls for "a full scale war", calls the SPFL "corrupt as fuck", and finishes it off with "we're going after them"?  You think that's reasonable?

That would be great - but he'd need to change the words slightly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎07‎/‎07‎/‎2018 at 16:15, markem said:

Sorry admin  - it’s already posted . 

——————

Rangers has been informed that the SPFL Board has refused our request for an independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the position and disclosure by its chairman, Murdoch MacLennan, of his appointment to the position of non-executive chairman at Dublin-based Independent News and Media (INM).

It is common knowledge that INM and celtic FC share two significant shareholders in Mr Dermot Desmond and Mr Denis O’Brien. Mr Desmond and Mr O’Brien each have the ability to appoint directors to the Board of INM. These directors are described in INM’s annual report and accounts as not being independent.

It is also clear that, as chairman of a company in the difficult position that INM finds itself, Mr MacLennan will be required to review evidence and materials relating to INM’s dealings with its shareholders, including Mr Desmond and Mr O’Brien. Has Mr MacLennan notified the SPFL chief executive of this conflict? If the chief executive was notified, as he should have been, can he confirm why he did not notify the SPFL Board of this interest?

It is surprising that Mr MacLennan does not recognise and acknowledge that there is clear scope for conflict of interest between the duties owed by him to the SPFL and its shareholders and the duties he now owes to INM and Mr Desmond and Mr O’Brien as INM shareholders. Under the present circumstances no SPFL club can be sure of being properly served.

Our concerns are heightened by the fact that Mr MacLennan has yet to offer an explanation for the very serious public allegations that he used highly inappropriate language when speaking about Rangers while working in the newspaper industry.

In the interests of proper governance, transparency and integrity the SPFL should have agreed to an independent investigation of this extremely serious matter and should not have refused to answer all questions and address the genuine concerns put to them in a formal letter by Rangers.

Now, however, and because there is no route of appeal against this decision, Rangers is left with no alternative but to call for Mr MacLennan to stand down as SPFL chairman. Apart from this being the correct course of action under the circumstances, it would also be the honourable thing to do.

Rangers believes that Mr MacLennan cannot be considered fit and proper to continue in his role as SPFL chairman as he is now obliged to recuse himself from meetings and decision-making processes which could impact on member clubs. The SPFL needs a chairman that can openly participate in all meetings.

They've called in to question the integrity of the SPFL.  They've called for MacLennan to step down.  There's no route of appeal but the reputation of McLennan and the SPFL will be sorely damaged by this.  The Rangers Board have done all they can for now and it's good to see them fighting the SPFL in such a public way.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TMB said:

A written statement isn't applying pressure.  But, if someone read this statement in front of a camera then it would be applying real pressure? 

I agree 100% 

The question is .Who is brave enough TMB 

It would make a massive difference IMO

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WATP-FOREVER said:

It has been suggested that Paul Murray was the bridge-builder - and not DK. 

Could be correct - as we've seen far more coming from Ibrox since pm disappeared. 

Tbh King did say on record he wants to share titles with celtic for the good of Scottish football and the statements he approves always have some cringeworthy shite about doing what's best for the Scottish game - that's bridge building to me in it's purest form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

Tbh King did say on record he wants to share titles with celtic for the good of Scottish football and the statements he approves always have some cringeworthy shite about doing what's best for the Scottish game - that's bridge building to me in it's purest form.

Maybe so, but there was zero to minimal official statements/complaints coming out of Ibrox when paul murray was hanging about and at least there's a improvement on that since he left. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 28 April 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      St Mirren v Rangers
      The SMiSA Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football
×
×
  • Create New...