Jump to content

Pay fines if we do not play Kent


Smile

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Siwel said:

We’re not gonna play him just because we want to save a bit of cash.

In my head this kind of fine is the only reason that Russell Martin managed to clock up as many appearances for us despite being absolutely dire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is there talk about fines? A loan fee is agreed between the clubs and is to be paid by the agreed date. The fee may be waived if the player makes x number of appearances. None of this relates to penalties or fines for a breach of a term of the contract. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Goosetav said:

Not thrilled about this signing but it's a pretty great deal having it done this way. If he's shite we'll have to pay the fee we would have to for any other loan signing, if he's good we'll be getting a decent addition for free

Nothing to moan about here at all

You would think so wouldn’t you. ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

You would think so wouldn’t you. ??

The way we let crayon wielding morons in the gutter press frame our business leaves much to be desired.

 

A decade ago none would have dared spout shite like this, for they knew the consequences would have been severe. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dread said:

The way we let crayon wielding morons in the gutter press frame our business leaves much to be desired.

 

A decade ago none would have dared spout shite like this, for they knew the consequences would have been severe. 

They've been doing it for near on 15 year.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Normal practice in the loan market but the taig press make it look like it’s just us. ??

Sadly some on here fall for it hook line and sinker. 

just like the taig press make it look like we are the only club to use director loans for funding, when in reality probably 50pc plus have this arrangement .including the taigs ,Chelsea, Newcastle, Liverpool etc 

And we are the only club that ever had a tax avoidance scheme .when probably 100pc of clubs have some way of reducing tax liability 

in fact I remember Nuremburg waxing lyrical about the taigs complex corporate structure was a tax reducing enterprise and part of their excellent financial structure 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TMB said:

Rangers sign a promising young talent from Liverpool and this is the story the newspapers go with?  I don't remember similar headlines when celtic signed Musonda and apparently lost a lot of money on that deal.  

Its actually getting beyond embarrassing now.  Their agenda is there for all to see. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rfc52 said:

They've been doing it for near on 15 year.  

correct. first really noticeable during boozegate then when we wanted the extension to the season in 2008 .

Minty used to have a tight hold of the media .but when he started to lose interest he stopped

timed just as lieswell took over at the giro dome. lieswells grip on the media blows away any influence minty had

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jbm26896 said:

Pretty standard terms on a loan deal with top clubs in England . 

The want there players to play a certain amount of games so they put in a clause saying so ,

dont really get the issue here. 

Apparently Norwich fined us £500,000 for sending him back.:whistle:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...