Jump to content
BridgeIsBlue

Big Jock Knew

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

Guess not 

22EDB85D-B031-42EA-9D87-8F4DBE4E595D.jpeg

All that build up for that ffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

Guess not 

22EDB85D-B031-42EA-9D87-8F4DBE4E595D.jpeg

Surely they mean the back pages 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone got a comprehensive rundown on BJK and the happenings are celtic? Any reason the authorities and media haven't been making a big deal about it? 

PS, the second question is rhetorical. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact they went with a negative "Rangers" headline is telling. They know what they should be making headlines about but are either too scared to or deliberately don't want to. 

The love of conspiracy theories, yet no one seems the least bit interested in this. 

I wonder if the Joe rogan, Alex Jones type guys would take any interest in this? Need someone with a media presence to get engaged and start making noise. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, East London Loyal said:

Anyone got a comprehensive rundown on BJK and the happenings are celtic? Any reason the authorities and media haven't been making a big deal about it? 

PS, the second question is rhetorical. 

Maybe someone will write a book on it. Seriously there must be enough in all this for a book.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Gman36 said:

Maybe someone will write a book on it. Seriously there must be enough in all this for a book.

Daly and Thompson are on it this very minute 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Brackley said:

Just love the irony.

Slur "you're no Rangers anymore"

Positive spin " CBC are no celtic anymore".

Hahaha! That's absolutely spot on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KingKirk said:

All that build up for that ffs

Any update on what the reasons for it not happening from ff would be appreciated KK. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Bears r us said:

Any update on what the reasons for it not happening from ff would be appreciated KK. 

All posters that said it was happening nowhere to be seen atm

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some saying scum lawyers have had it pulled:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every inch the kind of story you would think a prominent journalist like Alex Thomson from Ch 4 would be all over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

All posters that said it was happening nowhere to be seen atm

Now that is not a surprise. 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, KingKirk said:

Tomorrows record explosive stuff according to FF not been able to get a shot of it yet tho

i'll take a guess that threads now been chopped over on FF?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Sturgeon Knew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Amokachi said:

Every inch the kind of story you would think a prominent journalist like Alex Thomson from Ch 4 would be all over. 

That cunt was humiliated over the EBT fiasco and is extremely unlikely to attack our bitter rivals other than to blame us for not reporting it if we all knew about it for years!

Thomson is a bitter Rangers-hating bastard.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Gman36 said:

The fact they went with a negative "Rangers" headline is telling. They know what they should be making headlines about but are either too scared to or deliberately don't want to. 

The love of conspiracy theories, yet no one seems the least bit interested in this. 

I wonder if the Joe rogan, Alex Jones type guys would take any interest in this? Need someone with a media presence to get engaged and start making noise. 

Exactly. I've suggested before that David Icke would run with this if enough people contacted him. Doesn't matter if people think he's credible enough or not, 500k twitter subs, and nearly 600k YouTube subs would get it the exposure that's needed. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, BlanketOfBlue said:

Exactly. I've suggested before that David Icke would run with this if enough people contacted him. Doesn't matter if people think he's credible enough or not, 500k twitter subs, and nearly 600k YouTube subs would get it the exposure that's needed. 

Shifty eyed dog. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to get Tommy Robinson on the case with this would be right up his street!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been confirmation the people involved acted together?

And if not, how plausible is it that they were all committing these crimes independently of each other without any knowledge of any other similar crimes taking place?

Statistically surely almost impossible that they were acting independently. Therefore the balance of probabilities would surely indicate that some kind of organised group was involved.

That being the case there must surely be a high level of public interest in this, to bring the wider mechanism to account, and to ensure that protections are put in place to minimise the risk of it happening again. 

Now tally the media interest in and content generation about the following two events :

-Jimmy Savile scandal 

-Rangers financial woes. 

So media have shown a strong interest in the following topics:

-Paedophile rings/scandal

-Old firm club dramatic events.

Now compare to the media interest in and content generation of the CBC scandal. A fraction of the media interest in this. It covers concurrently two subjects which have been proven in the past to be of much interest to the media. Why the significantly lower interest generation in this subject? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/02/2019 at 12:52, Sparkle said:

 

👍

It's the first time I have heard this interview .... and I believe with her repeatedly pushing the "Seperate Entity" excuse .... and having it strongly denied by McGuire with plenty of historical backup each time .... has actually put the scum in an even more glaring spotlight than before with their denial of being connected to the boys club.

The rope is tightening round their necks and all the denial in the world is not going to help them as more victims come forward and hopefully hang the bastards.

:UK:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, KingKirk said:

Some saying scum lawyers have had it pulled:lol:

Cases have been to court and everything is in the public domain so highly unlikely. This has been an open secret for 50 years and the media coverage is almost non existent. Donald Findlay singing the sash was front page news for weeks, the guy who spat on the priest is still being reported on 8 months after event yet a paedophile ring at one of the countries biggest sports clubs is not worthy of a mention, the whole thing stinks.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ditch the big jock knew song to the the whole board knew you horrible bas....s your whole club knew

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/02/2019 at 12:52, Sparkle said:

 

A few times in that interview, there is reference to "celtic's Boys Club".  That is subtly different from "celtic Boys Club" and the filth will hate it as it explicitly links the boys club to celtic.  Oh, and it is a more accurate description.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×