Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
gman

league table

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, tannerall said:

Here's the table for the last 128 years. 

Team                                Titles

Rangers                           54 

cellic/Pacific Shelf        49

Kilmarnock                       1

 

 

Pacific Shelf is their patter mate 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rum Ham said:

Pacific Shelf is their patter mate 

 

 

It is a fact, not "Patter"  that cellic fc were known for various reasons as Pacific Shelf for a period of time but retained their identity and history, similar to when we were known as "Sevco". Definitely not "patter" and no harm in highlighting it as tims appear to be not aware of this , or prefer to ignore it, even preferring  to sweep it under the big bulging carpet, along with the other more serious allegations such as tax evasion by players and employees,  misappropriation of GCC funding and proven abuse of youths.

Read the bottom line here mate:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC153534

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Blumhoilann said:

Should be a wee ***** at PS in the leagues won,to account for the years we weren't there to compete wi them😉....that would be another 5 stars for us then.

Am I right in thinking we are the only team to have won all the top 4 leagues ? 

To be honest, it was a struggle, and a tad embarrasing at times, but we did it, and the fans were immense, with 50,000+ gates in the lower division, so I assume we own all the crowd records there too. 

And then there were the "War Records". I am proud our club does not include these,  even although at the time they would have brought a lot interest and pride to our  armed forces personnel and the people at home. A fitting acknowledgement to our heroes abroad and the worried people at home that the war was the priority, unlike the tims who keep their "war records" of goals scored etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tannerall said:

Was thinking that too. At first I thought @Rum Hamwas at it in a tim like manner , but may be a genuine "faux pas". 

It's tedious patter imo. 

Not because it's against the taigs, but because it validates their shite for the past 7 years. 

There's so much you could have referred to them there, which you pointed out in a post a couple above this one, but you chose one on par with the mongo 'sevco' shit. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Rum Ham said:

It's tedious patter imo. 

Not because it's against the taigs, but because it validates their shite for the past 7 years. 

There's so much you could have referred to them there, which you pointed out in a post a couple above this one, but you chose one on par with the mongo 'sevco' shit. 

 

 

Fight fire with fire is what I say, and don't let the tim bastards persuade you otherwise. We're too soft with them. Absolute embarrassment to our heritage that they get away with it. 

And fuck all tim appeasers out there, has done us no favours at all. 

(Mini rant over:happy:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

Never seen or heard a beggar call themselves Pacific Shelf ever.

It's pretty much validating their shit over the last few years, just because we can call them Pacific Shelf. 

If cunts are happy to be called Sevco just because we can call them Pacific Shelf, when they'd probably be happy to wipe their history clean then fair dos, but fuck that. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Rum Ham said:

It's pretty much validating their shit over the last few years, just because we can call them Pacific Shelf. 

If cunts are happy to be called Sevco just because we can call them Pacific Shelf, when they'd probably be happy to wipe their history clean then fair dos, but fuck that. 

 

I've still never seen or heard a beggar call themselves Pacific Shelf so no, it's not their patter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Rum Ham said:

It's pretty much validating their shit over the last few years, just because we can call them Pacific Shelf. 

If cunts are happy to be called Sevco just because we can call them Pacific Shelf, when they'd probably be happy to wipe their history clean then fair dos, but fuck that. 

 

I hated the Sevco stuff, but it was a fact that it was used to keep the club going as a business, so cannot deny it. Just an unsavoury part of our history  easily surpassed by all our other great achievements. A history of achievement which came very close to being lost. 

When you compare that relatively small incident to the number of things that the tims are in denial with however, it really does bheggar belief they could attempt to hold any kind of higher moral ground. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, tannerall said:

I hated the Sevco stuff, but it was a fact that it was used to keep the club going as a business, so cannot deny it. Just an unsavoury part of our history  easily surpassed by all our other great achievements. A history of achievement which came very close to being lost. 

When you compare that relatively small incident to the number of things that the tims are in denial with however, it really does bheggar belief they could attempt to hold any kind of higher moral ground. 

See. No football club is a business. 

The name, and everything that goes with it, didn't start as a business. It's a club, not something that can cease to exist, us or them. You support a club not the cunts that own it

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bornabear said:

When did you have your reading by-pass.

Don't worry, maybe Santa will give you some crayons this year.

can't wait! crayons taste good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Rum Ham said:

It's tedious patter imo. 

Not because it's against the taigs, but because it validates their shite for the past 7 years.

It validates nothing of the sort. It shows how trivial their name calling is, and that's all it is .. a bit of trivial name calling between opposition supporters. Whatever they think they have against us, we can show we have just as much against them. Nothing much to get upset about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...