Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
BridgeIsBlue

The Media Agenda

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, The Dude said:

Bodying Chris Sutton helps. 😂

If in your next article you body the likes of Conroy, Stewart, Boyd, Clarke and highlight the obvious agenda being cranked up then I'd be impressed. There's an article just waiting to be written, hell I'd even not copy and paste it on here... 

Malkster and VentyFour like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Within 48 hours of our game on Saturday we've had:

- a 7 year retired ex ref who publicly professes to being a scum fan brought in to analyse our penalties

- the same scum ref stating most refs support Rangers or celtic but he knows of no other scum supporters, implying they all support Rangers

- BBC driven agenda suggesting 4/5 penalty decisions were wrong, 3 of which were penalties we were given

- BBC presenters stating players dived and shouldn't get away with it.. they'd be as well waving to the camera to the Compliance Officer

- a BBC presenter challenging a neutral ref with 15 years service at the top end of English and Euro football, who deemed 3/4 given were correct. 

- platform given to a current spl manager who wasn't at game demanding a Rangers player be banned for simulation. 

- An ex celtic captain demanding impartial foreign refs be brought in to protect scum players as Scottish refs don't.

 

The media agenda can't be any clearer troops. Operation crank it up to win the scum 10 in a row at all costs is well underway. 

It's beyond a joke. I would not be surprised to see another referee strike before this season is out. 

I would invite them to bring foreign refs into Scotland. You can almost guarantee that 1 bad decision will be met with more conspiracy theories. 

Malkster likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a shite little league where teams play each othe four times, add in cup games and it really is a bit tedious. So the insane conspiracy theories fill column inches when hacks have nothing else to write about. The fact the cunts we’re still slabbering about Alfredo, three or four weeks after the game, showsthey are struggling to fill papers/reports. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, They Gnu said:

We have a shite little league where teams play each othe four times, add in cup games and it really is a bit tedious. So the insane conspiracy theories fill column inches when hacks have nothing else to write about. The fact the cunts we’re still slabbering about Alfredo, three or four weeks after the game, showsthey are struggling to fill papers/reports. 

There's probably a bit of truth in this. Realistically they want a close contest with a lot of back and forward as it gives more to talk about and attempt to stay relevant. So a resurgent Rangers with an assortment of conspiracy theories gives them plenty to say. 

Where the bias kicks in is the relentless negativity towards us. A more balanced outlook would be, Rangers have had to cope with absolute shite over the last 5-10 years. Ok some was self inflicted, we also got screwed over by plenty of enemies. Surely to fuck we deserve a bit of luck or the odd wee helping hand?

Even though we aren't really, we fucking deserve it. 

They Gnu likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, magic8ball said:

Heard the first hour of the phone in last night .

A bear comes on asking where the media outcry is when Rangers get decisions against them .keevins reply was .yes there would be and there is .Bear replies. absolute rubbish .keevins reply is well that's because of your viewpoint. 

Then a tarrier comes on blasting the penalties .The host of the show .who defo sounds like a tarrier but he does try and show a bit of balance .Quotes the rules that if a player is fouled outside the box and is continually fouled till the penalty box it's a penalty .the tarrier wasn't interested. 

Then last night I watched the Peter and Rougie football show. both including our "own" Barry Ferguson ignore this rule by claiming only 1 was s penalty. 

The rules are being ignored here by our media to make it look like the refs favour us .when it's clear to all us bears that we get far more against us than for us .

Prime example .when we beat the taigs at ibrox we had 2 weeks full flow about Morelos. Compare it to the game we lost at their midden. They scored from a clear foulon Ryan Jack .This was quickly brushed off as the tarriers were the better team anyway 

Never knew that part about the foul continuing into the box, cheers mate. 👍👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

SFA website, the direct link to IFAB rules of the game, section 12 states:

"If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick."

Dermot Gallagher out of all the "experts" is the only one who knows the rules in relation to the Candeais incident.

Nah, reading the rules makes too much sense. It'll never catch on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JCDBigBear said:

This obvious anti-Rangers bias is becoming both ridiculous and tedious and the Club should be making our own comment accordingly.   On Saturday there were 5 penalty decisions to be made.  1st one a stone wall penalty.  2nd was a soft award which Defoe didn't claim and tried to regain his footing.  There was contact though and a stockier player such as Morelos wouldn't have been troubled but Defoe is a lightweight. We missed the penalty so it didn't matter in the grand scheme of things.  The 3rd one is another stone wall penalty.  The camera angle is misleading because it is not  in line with the penalty box.  A geometric adjustment would prove that the ball and player were in the box (actually in the air over the box :p:) but the main thing about this award is that the linesman made the call not the referee. The linesman was in the best place level with the penalty box.  The 3rd one sees Candeias fouled both outside and inside the box and as SEMA above points out the rules state that if the foul continues inside the box it's a penalty.  The 5th one was a blatant foul on Morelos where he is pulled to the ground backwards.  Not given and apparently missed by all officials.   Let's take a look back to Cowdenbeath last Wednesday when Craig Thomson had 3 penalty decisions to make and he got all 3 wrong and all 3 decisions went against Rangers.   Where was the communal outpouring against Thomson?  There wasn't one because the decisions went against Rangers.  Killie's Clarke bemoaning about players being booked for celebrating off the park with the fans but in a recent game Morelos got booked when he didn't leave the park.  Nothing said there.  

Scottish media is controlled by those favouring the dark side.  Scottish football is controlled in the same manner.  Most of the Scottish judiciary and politics is similarly controlled.   We have allowed them to infiltrate to the point that getting a fair and balanced public hearing is almost impossible.    Recent media articles concerning fans of Rangers and the dark side are so obviously biased that we now take it for granted and say little if anything.  When it concerns Rangers fans it states Rangers in the headline.  When it is the other mob it simply states football fan(s).  The media even tried to hide the CFC name when the charges related to the numerous recent child abuse cases.  

We really need to get our voices heard.

It wasn't relevant information to the indictment so wasn't reportable whilst trials were ongoing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Malkster said:

How about coming from the angle ''there are more celtic pundits/journalists than Rangers'' ? 

Better to highlight the inconsistencies/fantasy in what they say rather than just playing the man.

LochendBilly likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, JCDBigBear said:

This obvious anti-Rangers bias is becoming both ridiculous and tedious and the Club should be making our own comment accordingly.   On Saturday there were 5 penalty decisions to be made.  1st one a stone wall penalty.  2nd was a soft award which Defoe didn't claim and tried to regain his footing.  There was contact though and a stockier player such as Morelos wouldn't have been troubled but Defoe is a lightweight. We missed the penalty so it didn't matter in the grand scheme of things.  The 3rd one is another stone wall penalty.  The camera angle is misleading because it is not  in line with the penalty box.  A geometric adjustment would prove that the ball and player were in the box (actually in the air over the box :p:) but the main thing about this award is that the linesman made the call not the referee. The linesman was in the best place level with the penalty box.  The 3rd one sees Candeias fouled both outside and inside the box and as SEMA above points out the rules state that if the foul continues inside the box it's a penalty.  The 5th one was a blatant foul on Morelos where he is pulled to the ground backwards.  Not given and apparently missed by all officials.   Let's take a look back to Cowdenbeath last Wednesday when Craig Thomson had 3 penalty decisions to make and he got all 3 wrong and all 3 decisions went against Rangers.   Where was the communal outpouring against Thomson?  There wasn't one because the decisions went against Rangers.  Killie's Clarke bemoaning about players being booked for celebrating off the park with the fans but in a recent game Morelos got booked when he didn't leave the park.  Nothing said there.  

Scottish media is controlled by those favouring the dark side.  Scottish football is controlled in the same manner.  Most of the Scottish judiciary and politics is similarly controlled.   We have allowed them to infiltrate to the point that getting a fair and balanced public hearing is almost impossible.    Recent media articles concerning fans of Rangers and the dark side are so obviously biased that we now take it for granted and say little if anything.  When it concerns Rangers fans it states Rangers in the headline.  When it is the other mob it simply states football fan(s).  The media even tried to hide the CFC name when the charges related to the numerous recent child abuse cases.  

We really need to get our voices heard.

An excellent post with your only minor omission that the cowdenbeath goal scorer had encroached by several yards and the goal should not have stood.

That aside, 👏👏👏👏👏 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Never knew that part about the foul continuing into the box, cheers mate. 👍👍

read it on here yesterday too .but always like info from 2 places before i really believe it 

Courtyard Bear likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JCDBigBear said:

This obvious anti-Rangers bias is becoming both ridiculous and tedious and the Club should be making our own comment accordingly.   On Saturday there were 5 penalty decisions to be made.  1st one a stone wall penalty.  2nd was a soft award which Defoe didn't claim and tried to regain his footing.  There was contact though and a stockier player such as Morelos wouldn't have been troubled but Defoe is a lightweight. We missed the penalty so it didn't matter in the grand scheme of things.  The 3rd one is another stone wall penalty.  The camera angle is misleading because it is not  in line with the penalty box.  A geometric adjustment would prove that the ball and player were in the box (actually in the air over the box :p:) but the main thing about this award is that the linesman made the call not the referee. The linesman was in the best place level with the penalty box.  The 3rd one sees Candeias fouled both outside and inside the box and as SEMA above points out the rules state that if the foul continues inside the box it's a penalty.  The 5th one was a blatant foul on Morelos where he is pulled to the ground backwards.  Not given and apparently missed by all officials.   Let's take a look back to Cowdenbeath last Wednesday when Craig Thomson had 3 penalty decisions to make and he got all 3 wrong and all 3 decisions went against Rangers.   Where was the communal outpouring against Thomson?  There wasn't one because the decisions went against Rangers.  Killie's Clarke bemoaning about players being booked for celebrating off the park with the fans but in a recent game Morelos got booked when he didn't leave the park.  Nothing said there.  

Scottish media is controlled by those favouring the dark side.  Scottish football is controlled in the same manner.  Most of the Scottish judiciary and politics is similarly controlled.   We have allowed them to infiltrate to the point that getting a fair and balanced public hearing is almost impossible.    Recent media articles concerning fans of Rangers and the dark side are so obviously biased that we now take it for granted and say little if anything.  When it concerns Rangers fans it states Rangers in the headline.  When it is the other mob it simply states football fan(s).  The media even tried to hide the CFC name when the charges related to the numerous recent child abuse cases.  

We really need to get our voices heard.

Superb post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Foreign as long as they come from the ROI, Poland or Italy is what they actually mean.

Ive heard them complain on umpteen occasions about foreign refs and probably some of them have been Italian or polish. The thing they would really like is to be able to appoint whichever ref they wanted. Steve Conroy coming out of retirement and doing all their games and possibly ours would be ideal. Until he made a decision that didn't suit of course, then he would be " overcompensating" or something. The bottom line is you will NEVER please these headcases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

The rebel is indeed at its cancerous best this morning 

Getting Boyd.That numbnut who attached himself to that video put together about biased refs favouring Rangers 

And Conroy .Remember him .Telling us he wasn't aware that any other celtic fan getting to same  position as him  ..He must have forgotten about Charlie bhoy Richmond ,Ian Brines and Steven Reilly to name 3 .There is a long list 

The bhoy Boyd takes the biscuit though 

He wants neutral refs ..What he really means .He wants every ref ,bheast  aligned to give the scum Every decision in Every game 

That is what our club are up against.

When did we last hear of any bear standing up for Rangers and saying these sort of things the other way ..Or indeed our own club, who have gone back to the old ways of being dignified silence and saying nothing since we were fined and took it up the arse  

Boyd was at a PR event held by Premier Sport as a representative of celtic. Nothing to do with the Record. 

Conroy's quotes came from BBC sportsound. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Dude said:

celtic's name was all over it after the trials.

"Boys club" separate entity pish and you know it 

The scum media were never on the attack against this vile club at any point ..They kept it carefully worded .Never opinionated

Almost apologetic with many

magic8ball and Bears like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, eejay the dj said:

"Boys club" separate entity pish and you know it 

The scum media were never on the attack against this vile club at any point ..They kept it carefully worded .Never opinionated

Almost apologetic with many

Thats because you cant say he worked for celtic without evidence without a potential lawsuit for defamation on your hands as well as if going to IPSO. Afaik it was accepted in court that they were employed by CBC and not CFC. When they were employed by the club and not the boys club its been pointed out. In gje seperate entity bit though, we reportedly done the same with someone who alleged abuse at Rangers and pointed then to the liquidators of the oldco. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...