Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jbm26896

The potential 5th penalty

Recommended Posts

Does anybody have any footage of Morelos being fouled near the end for what would have been another penalty, 

seens to be ignored by the media 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s Mo mate, it will be his fault he was grabbed around the head and thrown to the ground by the media pricks 

Some on here will agree with the sad pricks as well. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

More of a penalty than any of the others.

Ref shat it. 

I thought that as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was probably trying to think of a way to give Mo a second yellow for diving. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I like about all this is aside from the general disbelief that we were awarded 4 penalties is the implication that there is a maximum ‘sensible’ amount that should be awarded. What the media, twitter feeds etc are really saying is the ref should turn a blind eye if he feels there is a penalty but a couple have already been given 😂

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BlueThunder said:

What I like about all this is aside from the general disbelief that we were awarded 4 penalties is the implication that there is a maximum ‘sensible’ amount that should be awarded. What the media, twitter feeds etc are really saying is the ref should turn a blind eye if he feels there is a penalty but a couple have already been given 😂

Well, without being too controversial, I would say having awarded 3 penalties and the team being well up I would only expect him to give stonewallers thereafter. Any ones that were borderline and could have gone either way I would expect him to give the benefit of the doubt.

Having said that, the fifth was a stonewaller. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bordersbear said:

Apparently 5 penalties would have been another world record.

somebody asked the question on twitter and a game involving crystal palace had 5 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bakbear said:

Well, without being too controversial, I would say having awarded 3 penalties and the team being well up I would only expect him to give stonewallers thereafter. Any ones that were borderline and could have gone either way I would expect him to give the benefit of the doubt.

Having said that, the fifth was a stonewaller. 

That was my point - it was a stonewall penalty. 

But not a mention from any media source.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, soulboy said:

somebody asked the question on twitter and a game involving crystal palace had 5 

Were they all for one team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, They Gnu said:

This is how it works. Any contentious decision that goes in our favour is forensically anyalised with countless reruns and numerous column inches in the rags. Any controversial decision that goes against us is immediately forgotten. In the game V FC Paedo,  Alfredo’s indiscretions generated a media frenzy, yet a stamp and an elbow thrown at Scott Arfield by the Lego Eater Brown were neither replayed or commented on. Therefore the paranoia is fed and the undercurrent is there must be something in all this Masonic Conspiracy bollox. 

Our club is quite simply not doing enough on this front to counter this 

Maybe they have reason 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the ref was stopping at 3. The 4th he gave a free-kick as he thought it was outside the box. The lino signalled it was in the box,  therefore had to be a pen as he had called a foul.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully expected celtic to get some easy decisions today to balance the books so to speak. Instead they get a player sent off. Let the Kerrydale meltdown continue........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The match 'highlights' on the BBC Scotland website feature an extended whine from the 'commentator' about three of the penalties, but, strangely does not even show the Morelos incident. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I would also urge some caution bears 

I said ages ago ,we would get plenty of decisions for us in the  less important games 

And St Mirren was that game 

The sheep is the pivotal game .I'm more aware of all the calls that's been going against us in these bigger games pre scum game 

And it would not surprise me if we get some bad ones on Wednesday 

 

 

I have enjoyed the meltdown as much as anyone mate, but your post is worth reading and remembering. 👍

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, They Gnu said:

This is how it works. Any contentious decision that goes in our favour is forensically anyalised with countless reruns and numerous column inches in the rags. Any controversial decision that goes against us is immediately forgotten. In the game V FC Paedo,  Alfredo’s indiscretions generated a media frenzy, yet a stamp and an elbow thrown at Scott Arfield by the Lego Eater Brown were neither replayed or commented on. Therefore the paranoia is fed and the undercurrent is there must be something in all this Masonic Conspiracy bollox. 

Absolutely. On Wednesday night Thompson failed to award us two penalties, awarded one that was not a penalty to Cowdenbeath, and allowed a guy to score from a rebound although he was encroaching within the box when the kick was taken. Not a word about any of this from the media supporters of the establishment club. Yesterday's game provokes extensive whining and moaning from all the usual suspects. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I would also urge some caution bears 

I said ages ago ,we would get plenty of decisions for us in the  less important games 

And St Mirren was that game 

The sheep is the pivotal game .I'm more aware of all the calls that's been going against us in these bigger games pre scum game 

And it would not surprise me if we get some bad ones on Wednesday 

 

 

Me neither. Which joker have they selected from the clowns parade to referee on Wednesday?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jbm26896 said:

That was my point - it was a stonewall penalty. 

But not a mention from any media source.

Bobby Madden. Scum have Craig Thomson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Steve Conroy......

:tut:

But a rather good reply. :mutley:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, jbm26896 said:

Does anybody have any footage of Morelos being fouled near the end for what would have been another penalty, 

seens to be ignored by the media 

 

Highlights of all 5 are on the BBC sport site now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×