Blueshoff 11,799 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Wouldn't have sent either off tbh. Yellow each and get on with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Just now, ForeverAndEver said: 😂 Here is the rule tell me what part the keeper has broken A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play. Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play." Fuck all happened Shagger has the ball in his hands his momentum takes him into the sheep player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBOO72 4,372 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Blueshoff said: Wouldn't have sent either off tbh. Yellow each and get on with it. Bullshit. Mckennas red card was completely warranted and he knew it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 There was no excessive force or brutality from Morelos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,481 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, KingKirk said: Here is the rule tell me what part the keeper has broken A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play. Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play." Fuck all happened Shagger has the ball in his hands his momentum takes him into the sheep player My arse. He meant it, there’s no point denying it, it’s no as if he never does stupid stuff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 He had to call it violent conduct because there’s nothing else relevant he can send him off for on an off-the-ball incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,149 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Rum Ham said: Studs to the face and he's still painted as the bad guy. If Morelos leaving a foot in is violent conduct, what the fuck they going to call McKennas. The studs are after Morelos went in hard, still a yellow for Morelos right enough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,110 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, Rum Ham said: Studs to the face and he's still painted as the bad guy. If Morelos leaving a foot in is violent conduct, what the fuck they going to call McKennas. Naivety mate, haven't you heard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Sent off for violent conduct = rescinded. Said it last night, if McKenna gets booked Alfredo doesn't get sent off. The crazy part of that red card isn't that its not a red, its that its given by officials who claim they didn't see it, then when you watch the footage you can clearly see the linesman and probably the 4th official can see the whole incident including the initial barge from Mckenna. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Just now, ForeverAndEver said: My arse. He meant it, there’s no point denying it, it’s no as if he never does stupid stuff Go watch it back the keeper has the ball in his arms before the contact doesn't move his leg up or down hold it in the one position until he comes to a stop. So there was no challenge for the ball acts of brutality or force needed to warn't a charge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,717 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 I thought there was a bit of to and fro which meant hearings couldn't be until the 4th working day after an incident. How the fuck has it got does up to the 2nd working day after incident? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,110 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 17 minutes ago, Malkytfp1 said: If thats the case then Ferguson better be called up for leaving his boot on McGregor's balls. Aye that'll be right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: I thought there was a bit of to and fro which meant hearings couldn't be until the 4th working day after an incident. How the fuck has it got does up to the 2nd working day after incident? Holiday this Monday? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,110 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 How do clubs raise something with the compliance officer - I heard something like anyone can contact them? It's no wonder our players are always called up to these. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 1 hour ago, BridgeIsBlue said: McInnesssssssssssssss 3:10 into the video @ForeverAndEver Under SFA rules for violent conduct A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play. Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play." There is no tackle or challenge as the ball is in the hands of the keeper clearly shown above Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS4_wul 4,115 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: I thought there was a bit of to and fro which meant hearings couldn't be until the 4th working day after an incident. How the fuck has it got does up to the 2nd working day after incident? Because we play Kilmarnock on Saturday? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,481 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, KingKirk said: 3:10 into the video @ForeverAndEver Under SFA rules for violent conduct A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play. Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play." There is no tackle or challenge as the ball is in the hands of the keeper clearly shown above That’s Lewis on Morelos you’re squealing for a red Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Just now, ForeverAndEver said: That’s Lewis on Morelos you’re squealing for a red Every goalkeeper does it IF its OTT then yes I would be but thats just a piss take. Keeper has the ball before making contact with the player yet we have had some saying it could of been a pen now McGregor could be banned no chance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAFREG 471 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Panel of 3 not in same location looking at the same incident if one says no Red punishment is rescinded. All must agree ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverInBlue 31 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Be very surprised if it gets rescinded after the one at start of season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 Love it. He might just sneak this one I hope. It wasn't violent, but it was meant. Personally I would have squashed the cunt's bawz and made him a fanny. He was all over Alfredo the whole game up to that incident. Now if it get's rescinded, I fully expect civil war to break out and the UN called in, such is the level of hatred. The haters public pursuit of him is getting to Gazza levels. Demonisation. Public enemy no. 1. Simply because of who he he plays for and what he is. They simply cannot cope with him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 3 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Panel of 3 including ex ref I'm sure. Step forward Steve Conroy. Aye, I think in cases of things missed by match officials the compliance officer reports to a 3 man panel who then decide. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 3 hours ago, plumbGER said: It's not the compliance officers job I don't think. Is it that shadowy panel that the taigs got all conspiracy theory about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: Rightly so. Can't believe people trying to defend McGregor, actually embarrassing. Same ones who want Gordon sent off for much less. Ferguson can't be cited as he was booked. Goalkeepers slide out with their leg/s making contact with on coming players almost every game. Gordon fly kicked a player. I think GKs are perfectly entitled to protect themselves in that situation, Ferguson wasn't moving so fast he couldn't have got out of the way. However a player rushing in on a high ball will not expect the goal keepers leg to be 5 feet in the air with his studs showing will he. Gk's and outfield players might as well be on different planet as to how the rules are applied because if shagger is a MF, and makes that challenge on the center circle its a straight red. So aye, I wanted that mongo cited for trying to take a fellow pros head clean off and I don't think McGregor should be cited for trying to protect himself. If his leg isn't straight and Ferguson still doesn't stop or jump, there's still contact. The difference being the GK is prone whilst Ferguson is on his feet. I don't think I need to point out which of the 2 would be in more danger of serious injury in that situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: Rightly so. Can't believe people trying to defend McGregor, actually embarrassing. Same ones who want Gordon sent off for much less. Ferguson can't be cited as he was booked. McGregor Was in full control of the ball had it in both hands before the collision with Ferguson, Gordon Kung fu kicked a alloa player totally different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.