Malvern 11,329 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 12 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: I'm sure if they're selected they need to make themselves available and play. Even if theyve said they've retired. If they don't, the FA can enforce suspensions from subsequent domestic games. Edit Makelele https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11668/2388210/makelele-threatened-with-ban&ved=2ahUKEwjJ6tvRiLngAhWOVBUIHYCRDEYQFjAAegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw3D9BhztYCsgE0yJ-parTCi&cf=1 That's indentured servitude and is illegal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAFREG 471 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 13 minutes ago, evenstevens said: So yellow can be reviewed, but if ref takes no action on something he saw, they can't touch it? Presumably why McGregor got away with one at Parkhead and Morelos couldn't be cited after Ibrox OF game? Not arguing the merits of the incidents, just the refs inactions being the reason why they COULDN'T be touched retrospectively? But didn't Madden see the McGregor incident clear as day? Just look at the videos and photos he is looking straight at it. So he’s either been ordered to say he didn’t see it. Or he’s a lying bastard. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,717 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, Malvern said: That's indentured servitude and is illegal. No one had told Fifa it seems. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 minute ago, RAFREG said: Just look at the videos and photos he is looking straight at it. So he’s either been ordered to say he didn’t see it. Or he’s a pape puppet. No need to thank me for the correction. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: No one had told Fifa it seems. FIFA only excels in corruption. TEFTONG and SeparateEntityMyArse 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAFREG 471 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Malvern said: No need to thank me for the correction. A lying pape puppet Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 How can it be foul play from McGregor he is stationary so the sheep must have ran into him Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vision 16,729 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Today's panel listen to the appeal by the Paranoid Protestants. Bears r us and Blumhoilann 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS 3,321 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Fucking scandalous, trial by the press and tv, judgement by a clown with a hidden agenda. Time to stand up Rangers! toad, Bears r us and eejay the dj 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,961 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 2 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said: That was a red, don't know why anybody expected it to be changed. It was a red and I don't have an issue with McGregor being banned for it but the big issue here is pretty much every one of those 'incidents' from the weekend across various games were ALL reds and should have been retrospectively cited. No consistency and no transparency to the whole system. ForeverAndEver, ger4life_1872 and gogzy 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 53 minutes ago, psb07158 said: It was a red and I don't have an issue with McGregor being banned for it but the big issue here is pretty much every one of those 'incidents' from the weekend across various games were ALL reds and should have been retrospectively cited. No consistency and no transparency to the whole system. If it was a beggar player .Not one of the scum would have said that was a red card There are always bears that have to be different Blumhoilann and VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 We deserve everything we get after that pathetic statement from the club. Fuck off man Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,961 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 24 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: It was a beggar player .Not one of the scum would have said that was a red card There are always bears that have to be different Don't know what the fuck you're on about here tbh plenty of their lot in my work have been going on about how the Brown and Simunovic "tackles" should have been reds. McGregor's was a red. All day long. Ferguson's retaliation was a red. All day long. The issue here isn't that McGregor's wasn't a red (it was), rather, the rest were reds too and should also have been cited / retrospectively banned. RFC55, gogzy and Zappa6995 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 24 minutes ago, KingKirk said: We deserve everything we get after that pathetic statement from the club. Fuck off man What statement Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 minute ago, eejay the dj said: What statement Thread on it now bro Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,961 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 minute ago, eejay the dj said: What statement https://stv.tv/sport/football/1435505-Rangers-demand-urgent-review-following-mcgregor-ban/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,961 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 In isolation, I wouldn't have an issue with him getting a ban. If the referee seen it properly he could easily have walked during game. However the narrative in the game just now seems to be every single incident we are involved in gets analysed and spoken about, our players are getting cited all the time because of this and other players are getting away with similar type things as the incidents as they are not being highlighted for whatever reason. The system is a trial by media and a few vocal people seem to hold a lot of sway in what gets picked up and what does not. As has been pointed out on here, there were a handful of incidents over the last few weeks that have been just as bad as McGregor with no further action taken, not even cited for a review. The system is pretty terrible tbh. Absolutely no consistency, no transparency and seems to be made up as it goes along. BlueKnight87 and gogzy 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBOO72 4,372 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 That statement is fucking pathetic. VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol loyal 6,248 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 The sfa are now saying you can boot a player in the face but a keeper can’t slide in to collect the ball, I’ll be interested to see the consistency future incidents like this are dealt with... Our statement is a fucking joke aswell. I don’t care what anyone says the reason we’re getting treated like this and the taigs get away with the ‘challenges’ they do is because of the way they play the media and pressure the refs, until we start fighting dirty like they do this shit will continue and get worse as we get closer to them. Blumhoilann 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmgers2 48 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 21 hours ago, Malkytfp1 said: Explain why it wasn't. he was just doing what most goalies do protecting themselves. Explain why it was a red? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 24 minutes ago, dmgers2 said: he was just doing what most goalies do protecting themselves. Explain why it was a red? he slid in with a straight leg and studs raised. Anywhere else on the park and it's a red. That being said, keepers get off with shit like that all the time. ForeverAndEver 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,110 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, gogzy said: That being said, keepers get off with shit like that all the time. Like Gordon who has karate kicked two people and not been cited. It's a red for me, but that's not the point - it's the fact those mhanky stinking bastards get away with everything week in, week out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Leeds_Bear said: Like Gordon who has karate kicked two people and not been cited. It's a red for me, but that's not the point - it's the fact those mhanky stinking bastards get away with everything week in, week out. I am not saying that the rules are being applied evenly. All I am sayin is that in this specific situation, a red isn't that out there. Of course Gordon should have been cited and banned for his one, he wasn't. We should point out the lack of parity. We shouldn't be kidding ourselves that red card chalenges are not red card challenges. Inigo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,882 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 23 minutes ago, gogzy said: I am not saying that the rules are being applied evenly. All I am sayin is that in this specific situation, a red isn't that out there. Of course Gordon should have been cited and banned for his one, he wasn't. We should point out the lack of parity. We shouldn't be kidding ourselves that red card chalenges are not red card challenges. The only worrying thing for me gogzy is that we are now having games basically re-refereed. Yellows are being made into reds. And wether that be Rangers or Raith rovers that's a very very rocky road to go down gogzy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,110 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 15 minutes ago, Rfc52 said: The only worrying thing for me gogzy is that we are now having games basically re-refereed. Yellows are being made into reds. And wether that be Rangers or Raith rovers that's a very very rocky road to go down And it’s happenkng to everyone except that mob. Blumhoilann 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.