McGregor banned 2 games

[Leeds_Bear 8,101]

3 minutes ago, DBBTB said:

I’m going to get slated for this but I don’t even think they show bias. Every club has had a shot at calling the decision making into question because there is inconsistency all over the place. It’s happening in nearly every game and to every club in the league. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing or how to run a top flight professional football league.

This is it for me, except one thing - celtic have consistently received favourable decisions in these processes. It’s fucked for the rest of Scottish football. 

[Prso's headband 35,325]

Just now, Amato said:

What qualifications does the compliance officer have that puts her in a position to be able to decide what incidents merit a notice of complaint? A woman who has never played football at a respectable level?

Does she have a panel helping her decide (other than Sportscene and the Scottish media)? 

Sportscene and the Scottish media are the panel by the looks of things

[ianferguson 2,619]

9 minutes ago, 35 Yard Dangerman said:

We need someone to actually challenge McGregor. He's no a challenge whatsoever. 

The guy to challenge McGregor ain't coming to Scotland, Wes is best we'll get and imo is more than decent.

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

Just now, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

In your opinion.

Agreed, but my opinion makes more sense than your nonsense. 

Tell me how Ferguson is going to plant his foot when he runs into McGregor once the ball is under his control and Ferguson has more than enough time to get out the way. 

Tell me how Mo left his boot in when the footage clearly shows that never happened. 

[Bearsden bear 2,376]

1 minute ago, Jeffrey said:

Ridiculous tackle from him but Gordon has got away with worse

Think this means Morelos will get off though

Same, do one let the other off

[Blue Rino 1,215]

17 minutes ago, philiprfc said:

Think Brown was booked for it mate so they can't do anything about it.

The Simunovic one is a nonsense but.

Ignored the Burke dive too.

Mate has the Hibs player been looked at today too?

[bluenoz 30,659]

So let me get this straight...... the Hibs boy has been cited after being booked? Fuck me, they've opened a can of worms there. The SFA don't have a clue. They really don't know what they are doing. Last guys picked for teams in the playground no doubt.

[chris182 6,279]

Just now, Jeffrey said:

Ridiculous tackle from him but Gordon has got away with worse

Think this means Morelos will get off though

This is why the system doesn't work. Its also why the refereeing standards in this country are so poor. 

Each decision, be it by the ref or  CO, has to be on its own merits. It simply doesn't happen 

[Blues Brother 1,115]

Goalkeepers have every right to protect themselves, especially diving at the feet of attackers. Every goalkeeper in the world would  do exactly what was done here..

Be interesting to see the football over the weekend and if any similar incidents occur will the same action be taken?

 

 

 

[gmcf 34,088]

1 minute ago, Jeffrey said:

Ridiculous tackle from him but Gordon has got away with worse

Think this means Morelos will get off though

Im not so sure . 

The fact theyve rushed his appeal so it's decided before our cup game makes me fear the worst .

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

4 minutes ago, five stars said:

The Sfa need to come out and fully explain their rules and the reasoning behind the decisions. Otherwise it just looks like they're making it up as they go along.

That’s what they are doing, making it up as they go along. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,613]

17 minutes ago, philiprfc said:

 

Actually, the Hibs boy was booked for his challenge  now been cited. Honestly fuck knows man.

And in amongst it all the worst challenge of Wednesday was Brown, who escapes with a yellow.

Any wonder they are top of the fair play table when 1 yellow us given between Brown Burke and Simunovic yet Rangers (potentially x 2), Sheep  and Hivs players get reds and /or 2 game bans. When was the last time the compliance Officer cited and banned a scum player...?

Zero transparency. Maximum bias in favour of one club.

 

[.Williamson. 81,983]

Thought this might happen 

[KingKirk 25,595]

Free for all now only themselves to blame 

[Bigsasasfloppyhair 13,310]

4 minutes ago, Amato said:

What qualifications does the compliance officer have that puts her in a position to be able to decide what incidents merit a notice of complaint? A woman who has never played football at a respectable level?

Does she have a panel helping her decide (other than Sportscene and the Scottish media)? 

Exactly what do woman know about fitbaw

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

4 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

Should be OK to miss St Johnstone and Hamilton surely... 

They even classed it as violent conduct, ffs what a load of bull. 

[WATP-FOREVER 5,231]

10 minutes ago, DBBTB said:

I’m going to get slated for this but I don’t even think they show bias. Every club has had a shot at calling the decision making into question because there is inconsistency all over the place. It’s happening in nearly every game and to every club in the league. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing or how to run a top flight professional football league.

It's a kangaroo fkn court man - trial by incompetent fenians. Where's the retribution inquiry into brown. Not a peep. 

This is setting a precedence against Rangers - and this furore will continue in every game going forward. 

[RAFREG 471]

10 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

I know it's a Rangers forum so we're going to be a bit biased but you can't seriously compare the 2

Ferguson on McGregor was leaving a foot in, similar to Morelos on McKenna and neither is worthy of a ban IMO.

McGregor on Ferguson was a potential leg breaker if his studs were planted. Idiotic.

The difference is it was a completely deliberate act by Ferguson. 

[Supersonic 4,654]

It's mental if they've cited that hibs player if he's already been booked for it. It's honestly beyond ridiculous the lack of consistency in not only the citations themselves but the final decisions! Each and every one, from the CO herself to the board making the decisions, are not fit for purpose!

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

5 minutes ago, Amato said:

What qualifications does the compliance officer have that puts her in a position to be able to decide what incidents merit a notice of complaint? A woman who has never played football at a respectable level?

Does she have a panel helping her decide (other than Sportscene and the Scottish media)? 

Lawyer from the legal company that looks after the scum. 

[Lord Lockin 3,908]

Since day one the compliance officer's been a farce, obviously high profile teams will be highlighted by the media with the very same challenges made in more minor games which will go no further - fuckin complete joke

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,613]

Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

They even classed it as violent conduct, ffs what a load of bull. 

They have to, that's what they are looking for in the retrospective review.

[BridgeIsBlue 66,595]

Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

They even classed it as violent conduct, ffs what a load of bull. 

I've seen other tweets where it's serious foul play he's been charged with so I'm not sure. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,613]

1 minute ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Lawyer from the legal company that looks after the scum. 

No conflict of interest though.

[bluenoz 30,659]

1 minute ago, Supersonic said:

It's mental if they've cited that hibs player if he's already been booked for it. It's honestly beyond ridiculous the lack of consistency in not only the citations themselves but the final decisions! Each and every one, from the CO herself to the board making the decisions, are not fit for purpose!

would have loved to see wee Lennon going aff his fucking nut.