The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: I've no idea what you're on about. There is a precedent and process to take action against yellow carded players. Again today it has came to fruition. They pick and chose when it's applicable. That screams incompetence to me, if it doesn't to you then fair enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangerswuls 60 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, bluenoz said: The point is if others can get pulled up after receiving a yellow then why can't Broon or Lewis? exactly mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, bluenoz said: The point is if others can get pulled up after receiving a yellow then why can't Broon or Lewis? Because they have absolutely no idea what they are doing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,576 Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, Jeffrey said: How? You're saying it's a bias against Rangers when there is examples of them bending the rules to punish Livingston and Hibs. All I'm saying is there must be a bias against them. You're saying a rule isn't in place yet it is and I've shown you a precedent. I'm saying the bias is in favour of a club that don't seem a) reffed b) compliance officer reviewed as others do. Today we got a 5 game suspension tally against the scums 1 yellow card. Their simulation one is incredible as to how it's not a yellow for simulation. Their other 2 could have came under Compliance Officer review, regardless of Browns yellow card,... but unsurprisingly didn't. Some teams seem to get away with a lot, both on the field and retrospectively by the compliance officer, others don't. The scum do, we don't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,318 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: You're saying a rule isn't in place yet it is and I've shown you a precedent. I'm saying the bias is in favour of a club that don't seem a) reffed b) compliance officer reviewed as others do. Today we got a 5 game suspension tally against the scums 1 yellow card. Their simulation one is incredible as to how it's not a yellow for simulation. Their other 2 could have came under Compliance Officer review, regardless of Browns yellow card,... but unsurprisingly didn't. Some teams seem to get away with a lot, both on the field and retrospectively by the compliance officer, others don't. The scum do, we don't. We’ve been let off with half of ours this season that I can think of Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,576 Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Jeffrey said: They pick and chose when it's applicable. That screams incompetence to me, if it doesn't to you then fair enough. Incompetence here is like the big decisions evening themselves out on the park argument. We'll have a long wait. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: You're saying a rule isn't in place yet it is and I've shown you a precedent. I'm saying the bias is in favour of a club that don't seem a) reffed b) compliance officer reviewed as others do. Today we got a 5 game suspension tally against the scums 1 yellow card. Their simulation one is incredible as to how it's not a yellow for simulation. Their other 2 could have came under Compliance Officer review, regardless of Browns yellow card,... but unsurprisingly didn't. Some teams seem to get away with a lot, both on the field and retrospectively by the compliance officer, others don't. The scum do, we don't. If there is an agenda that is against us and for them how do you explain Morelos going unpunished in a game against them when he could have been sent off twice and retrospectively done twice? ForeverAndEver 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,576 Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, ForeverAndEver said: We’ve been let off with half of ours this season that I can think of That have been put to panel members by a compliance officer who appears to be fed her cases by trial by tv. Trial by scum influenced tv. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,591 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Jeffrey said: If there is an agenda that is against us and for them how do you explain Morelos going unpunished in a game against them when he could have been sent off twice and retrospectively done twice? Can't believe you are defending the SFA when the bias is so blatantly clear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,591 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said: We’ve been let off with half of ours this season that I can think of Yes but the goalposts are moving all the time with new precedents. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Incompetence here is like the big decisions evening themselves out on the park argument. We'll have a long wait. Whatever. We have had plenty of decisions go our way that shouldn't have and plenty that we should have got but haven't. Hibs have been wronged today as well but that seems to be getting ignored to push a certain point of view. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, bluenoz said: Can't believe you are defending the SFA when the bias is so blatantly clear. I'm not defending them what are you talking about? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,576 Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Jeffrey said: If there is an agenda that is against us and for them how do you explain Morelos going unpunished in a game against them when he could have been sent off twice and retrospectively done twice? Who is bottom of the fair play stats? Are we really the dirtiest or least disciplined team in the league? Are the scum really the cleanest or best disciplined team in the league - or do they not pick up cards quite ax readily? If we keep getting put to panels the likelihood is some will go for, some against. If we're never put to them, none will go against. Bears 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 5 penalties in 2 games and people think there is an agenda against us Operation stop 1 in a row is in full swing clearly Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ibrox Derry 8,852 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 This is no new thing against our club. It was the same when Souness was here, and he used the siege mentality to great effect, and to lead us to winning ways. Let's look to the past for guidance here. We are the fucking people. GlasgowsBlue and Reformation Bear 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Starting 2moro with a Defoe winner, celebrated in front of their dugout Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Who is bottom of the fair play stats? Are we really the dirtiest or least disciplined team in the league? Are the scum really the cleanest or best disciplined team in the league - or do they not pick up cards quite ax readily? If we keep getting put to panels the likelihood is some will go for, some against. If we're never put to them, none will go against. I don't watch other teams in this league so can't answer that and unless you do you cant either. ForeverAndEver and Clemdog 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,576 Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Jeffrey said: Whatever. We have had plenty of decisions go our way that shouldn't have and plenty that we should have got but haven't. Hibs have been wronged today as well but that seems to be getting ignored to push a certain point of view. How have hibs been wronged? The foul looked a bad one. The CO followed a process you don't believe exists and took retrospective action. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,260 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 27 minutes ago, bluenoz said: Dignified silence was 100% wrong back then. Right now everybody is greetin..... Levin, McInnes, Clarke..... I think we will look bigger if we just keep winning. We all know how wrong it is Winning is non negotiable tho. We need to step up the offense against them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,318 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: That have been put to panel members by a compliance officer who appears to be fed her cases by trial by tv. Trial by scum influenced tv. I’m a mongo and canny make sense of that. If it’s due to ‘scum’ influenced tv’ surely Morelos and McGregor against them would have went against us rather than for us? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,348 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: How have hibs been wronged? The foul looked a bad one. The CO followed a process you don't believe exists and took retrospective action. Because they normally don't look at incidents that the referee has seen. They have made an exception for this one incident to punish a Hibs player Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,576 Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Jeffrey said: I don't watch other teams in this league so can't answer that and unless you do you cant either. Then how can you comment on whether we're being treated unfairly compared to others or not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 20 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: I wasn't at the games but I've seen the clips of the 3 incidents on here. Have you? Brown's challenge didn't warrant compliance review? Seen a clip of the dive, but didn't see the referees position. Happy to be shown a clip of his position, but as I said the referees are shite. Brown was booked, so cannot be retrospectively punished. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the old guard 2,312 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Only way to react to this is simple, win, win, and keep winning, weve known for years were being wronged, get the bit between our teeth and show no fear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geneva_ger 9,317 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 16 minutes ago, Jeffrey said: They pick and chose when it's applicable. That screams incompetence to me, if it doesn't to you then fair enough. ... is not incompetence, it's choosing as you say and therefore not incompetence. Picking and choosing is a deliberate act. gmcf and gogzy 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.