Jump to content

BBC DEMO VB protest


BridgeIsBlue

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Stop greeting and act like an adult so we can discuss this properly  , 

What great message would that have sent or achieved ?  This is an organisation that harboured and covered for multiple paedophiles with no shame so what excellent message was gonna be delivered by a few thousand standing outside ? 

Why would I contact the club when I have said they are spineless and if there was gonna be any protest it should be aimed at them ? Robertson could have tripled the attendance by showing everyone the proof he says he has of them admitting treating us differently but he didn't because he is a spineless coward 

So it's always someone else's responsibility, always someone else's fault. Thought as much.

You don't think thousands of bears protesting outside the offices of the BBC would have generated interest in why we were there, would have shown the club we back them in their quest against the BBC? Of course it would, but the apathy shown has actually been counter productive.

What have you done to express your views to this spineless board? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

So it's always someone else's responsibility, always someone else's fault. Thought as much.

You don't think thousands of bears protesting outside the offices of the BBC would have generated interest in why we were there, would have shown the club we back them in their quest against the BBC? Of course it would, but the apathy shown has actually been counter productive.

What have you done to express your views to this spineless board? 

Are you not gonna bother answering my points no ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

So you've done nothing, nothing at all, and still you act snide towards those trying to get the support to unite against the BBC. Glad we agree on that. 

The club have commented they're working behind the scenes on this. Traynor recently went into it in a little more detail. I'd love to know more, see more, but appreciate they're doing so through the channels available.

I got from Traynor that they knew the fans were outraged by the actions of the BBC. I got the impression they wouldn't be upset if the fans showed that discontent.

Some have cancelled their licence fees, futile imo but respect their actions. Some have emailed the BBC or bodies that are meant to ensure their impartiality. Well done them. Others have protested outside the BBC offices.

Most show apathy, the worst show snideness to those who have done something, however little or unsuccessful. An opportunity to have thousands protesting and get the message out that we won't accept the bias has been lost. Apathy wins.

So no I'm not greeting, but I am fucked off by the apathy shown by the support. And by the stupidity of the poster who didn't go as it was VB led, and by snide comments such as yours when you're shown up to have done fuck all yourself.

Oh if not having a license is doing something then count me in for that , uniting the support for what though ? To stand outside a building , you fire in and best of luck with it , imo though it's a pointless waste of time 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Oh if not having a license is doing something then count me in for that , uniting the support for what though ? To stand outside a building , you fire in and best of luck with it , imo though it's a pointless waste of time 

Worst cunts are the ones who stand back doing fuck all, being snide at those trying something / anything, moaning about things never changing for the better.

For clarity, that's you 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Worst cunts are the ones who stand back doing fuck all, being snide at those trying something / anything, moaning about things never changing for the better.

For clarity, that's you 👍

Well it's not me because I'm not moaning about things not changing 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Bears r us said:

I am not a member of VB but would have been at the protest on Sat if the Broxi visit had not been arranged before and I could not be at two places at one time.

As far a CG goes, after his initial burst onto the media I would say he has been involved in splits in the Rangers support and I have no time for him, mind you he seems to have got his reward as many others who split the support have done. 

Sorry for taking this :offtopic: but I cannot stand CG and find it difficult to not comment as this poster has, my bad. :angrywillie:

You put folk in their place so nicely mate. 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, eejay the dj said:

And that's your 20th post 🤔

Having a go at the only people that give a Fuck about Rangers .There are a long list of people that should but don't 

Chris Graham was full of his own self importance and the arrogance was reekin out of him 

 

 

Don’t mind them other than the other of articles based on the Tarriers, and fair play for actually trying to do something rather than just greet on the internet, but that is complete pish

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

Don’t mind them other than the other of articles based on the Tarriers, and fair play for actually trying to do something rather than just greet on the internet, but that is complete pish

The club don't give 2 fucks it appears 

So who else steps up then against our enemies ?Curious 🤔 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

So it's always someone else's responsibility, always someone else's fault. Thought as much.

You don't think thousands of bears protesting outside the offices of the BBC would have generated interest in why we were there, would have shown the club we back them in their quest against the BBC? Of course it would, but the apathy shown has actually been counter productive.

What have you done to express your views to this spineless board? 

Out of curiosity....how much media attention did thousands marching to Hampden generate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Sket said:

Any proof of that? What good did it do?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-17877910&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw0NxMcPbOcXKXKLQmMcNEc

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.itv.com/news/story/2012-04-27/substantial-bid-for-Rangers/&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3OOuzpfwKbYAeZZy-CEheb

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13056142.thousands-of-Rangers-fans-in-hampden-protest-march/&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjACegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1gMArnv-O7PCJfdLPt-463

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/teams/Rangers/Rangers-fans-march-en-masse-to-hampden-to-rally-against-sfa-sanctions-1-2262674/amp&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjADegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw12TprN1zXeb9gS3sOvXBqg&ampcf=1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2136663/amp/Thousands-Rangers-fans-descend-Hampden-Park-protest-SFA-sanctions.html&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjAGegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0dMb2UnfYgibfwtjN_Qc5y&ampcf=1

Some of the TV and press coverage.

Didn't stop some of the penalties we incurred.  But the SFA is meant to act in the interests of all member clubs, and pretty much all of them were wanting us punished. So the sfa was very much enabled as the judge, jury and executioner.

The publicly funded BBC itself states:

Impartiality lies at the heart of public service and is the core of the BBC's commitment to its audiences.  It applies to all our output and services - television, radio, online, and in our international services and commercial magazines.

It's role and function is different to that of the SFA, and it's right that it should be held to account.

If you're implying that because a march to Hampden failed to stop us being punished so by default a protest at the BBC wouldn't work then I think that's a flawed theory. But if it works for you as a reason not to be involved then that's your right. Bizarre as it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForeverAndEver said:

You said they’re the only people that care about Rangers, not who takes the fight to the ‘enemy’.

It's more or less what I meant 

I'm not stupid enough to think, the rank and file don't 

Why would be so sad to come on here 24/7 😉and moan about Rangers 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Confirming you are one of the worst cunts who stand back doing fuck all, being snide at those trying something / anything 😂

Quite a lot of them on here mate 

bitching and whining as long as it's one of our own 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-17877910&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw0NxMcPbOcXKXKLQmMcNEc

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.itv.com/news/story/2012-04-27/substantial-bid-for-Rangers/&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3OOuzpfwKbYAeZZy-CEheb

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13056142.thousands-of-Rangers-fans-in-hampden-protest-march/&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjACegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1gMArnv-O7PCJfdLPt-463

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/teams/Rangers/Rangers-fans-march-en-masse-to-hampden-to-rally-against-sfa-sanctions-1-2262674/amp&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjADegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw12TprN1zXeb9gS3sOvXBqg&ampcf=1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2136663/amp/Thousands-Rangers-fans-descend-Hampden-Park-protest-SFA-sanctions.html&ved=2ahUKEwiJ88yWmI7hAhU3SRUIHX8ZAooQFjAGegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0dMb2UnfYgibfwtjN_Qc5y&ampcf=1

Some of the TV and press coverage.

Didn't stop some of the penalties we incurred.  But the SFA is meant to act in the interests of all member clubs, and pretty much all of them were wanting us punished. So the sfa was very much enabled as the judge, jury and executioner.

The publicly funded BBC itself states:

Impartiality lies at the heart of public service and is the core of the BBC's commitment to its audiences.  It applies to all our output and services - television, radio, online, and in our international services and commercial magazines.

It's role and function is different to that of the SFA, and it's right that it should be held to account.

If you're implying that because a march to Hampden failed to stop us being punished so by default a protest at the BBC wouldn't work then I think that's a flawed theory. But if it works for you as a reason not to be involved then that's your right. Bizarre as it is.

I wasn't implying anything I was simply asking a question. Put your tampon back in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 17 April 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Dundee v Rangers
      The Scot Foam Stadium at Dens Park
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Main Event HD
×
×
  • Create New...