Morelos facing ban

[Smile 26,600]

Just now, mitre_mouldmaster said:

What trick did he fall for?

Getting the back of his Achilles raked with a stud and pushing the guy away?

To get a reaction, which he did. it was a small incident which only seems to have caused really fury on here.

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

Just now, Smile said:

You are now making up scenarios that haven't happened. Morelos, as I said, is not a dirty player he's a daft player falling for the same routine time and time again.

Eh? How am I making up the scenario. It is literally the scenario you made up above. Its an absurd scenario, hence I am trying to get you to explain it.

 

[Smile 26,600]

1 minute ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

Eh? How am I making up the scenario. It is literally the scenario you made up above. Its an absurd scenario, hence I am trying to get you to explain it.

 

You lost me now you have brought Brown into it who had nothing to do with what happened with Morelos yesterday. has Morelos been cited or do all your sad wee lives just need to be filled with anger?

[bluenoz 30,681]

Just came on to see Smile having his weekly go at Morelos. No surprise there. At least he's not asking to be subbed for Laverty this week.

[thehost 11,061]

We should be defending our players when they do wrong far less when they are the victims.... FFS every other support defend their players irrespective of how wrong they are. On here we have poster after poster moaning about the only fucking good footballer we possess.

 

Talk about doing the filth's work for them!

[Bears r us 30,771]

2 hours ago, Blumhoilann said:

Agree wi most of what you say BA but the last bit sticks a bit. It shouldn't be up to Rangers to sign players up for a kicking match,we should be signing the best quality players we can afford in the hope of winning the league and cups.

We are a footballing team and have been losing points because of the cloggers and the bias treatment of Refs.If we sign pure cloggers to deal wi the dirt in the league,would it change anything,certainly wouldn't change the attitude of Refs/SFA/SPFL towards our Club but would maybe give us fans some joy at seeing our players put the boot in for a change?

Yes I agree with that part, but the rest of BA's post like you say was good.  

[BridgeIsBlue 66,595]

Oooh the petulance 

Oooooh the temper

Battered from pillar to post every single game but he's just supposed to literally Smile and get on with it. 

[JM1872 3,705]

5 minutes ago, Smile said:

To get a reaction, which he did. it was a small incident which only seems to have caused really fury on here.

Any human being would have reacted the same. A deliberate attempt to cause a scene/start something and possibly even cause an injury.

 Broadfoot's been acting like a right taig against us lately.

[Smile 26,600]

Just now, JM1872 said:

Any human being would have reacted the same. A deliberate attempt to cause a scene/start something and possibly even cause an injury.

 Broadfoot's been acting like a right taig against us lately.

He has and players have fell for it Jack never touched him in one game and got sent off our players have to be brighter and see what he's doing.

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

2 minutes ago, Smile said:

You lost me now you have brought Brown into it who had nothing to do with what happened with Morelos yesterday. has Morelos been cited or do all your sad wee lives just need to be filled with anger?

I didnt bring brown into it. Someone else did and then you went on to say how you would 'Do him' with im guessing some form of '1 inch punch' that would be undetectable to a referee.

21 minutes ago, Smile said:

What's Brown got to do with this? I would do him in the next tackle but make it look accidental it easy enough to do. Morelos is not even been cited for this as it was a nothing incident everyone on this thread wants to be offended about.

So since you can clearly see in the post above that your preferred course of action on Brown is to 'Do him in the next tackle, but make it look accidental', can you confirm that you would not be critical of Morelos if he gets sent off for a dirty challenge on Brown in the next match?

[Don81 2,837]

Bit off topic but don't remember Broadfoot being such a cunt when he was with us. Maybe didn't  notice it at the time.

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

1 minute ago, Smile said:

He has and players have fell for it Jack never touched him in one game and got sent off our players have to be brighter and see what he's doing.

That doesn't even make sense.

How can he be brighter? What course of action is Jack to take in this scenario?

Is he to not touch him even less?

 

[Smile 26,600]

3 minutes ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

I didnt bring brown into it. Someone else did and then you went on to say how you would 'Do him' with im guessing some form of '1 inch punch' that would be undetectable to a referee.

So since you can clearly see in the post above that your preferred course of action on Brown is to 'Do him in the next tackle, but make it look accidental', can you confirm that you would not be critical of Morelos if he gets sent off for a dirty challenge on Brown in the next match?

3

This wasn't you.

15 minutes ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

So we are to believe that if Morelos goes into the next old firm game and gets sent off within 5 minutes for a challenge with Brown, you wont have any complaints?

Sounds plausible.

1

 

21 minutes ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

You would be the first one on here moaning about how stupid Morelos was if he went into a tackle trying to do Brown and got sent off for it.

it is actually incredibly difficult to 'do' someone in a challenge and get away with it. Challenges that are dangerous are punished, accidental or not.

We have also yet to see if Morelos will be cited for it as the window for this has not closed. What people are annoyed at is that yet again, trial by media is occurring.

 

 

[Smile 26,600]

So ask again has Morelos been cited for this nothing incident everyone seems to be getting worked up about.?

[Getstiffed 8,863]

9 out of 10 of Morelos' bookings for reacting are a direct consequence of being kicked fuck out of with no recourse from the referee.

You can equate it to life outside football imo. You get assaulted on a daily basis in the street, the police know its happening and never do anything prevent or punish anyone for it so you end up taking the law into your own hands and YOU end up in the pokey.

Not only that but its you that's labeled the mad man.

If the refs do their fucken job with some semblance of competency then we're not having this conversation imo.

[McEwan's Lager 30,498]

1 minute ago, Getstiffed said:

9 out of 10 of Morelos' bookings for reacting are a direct consequence of being kicked fuck out of with no recourse from the referee.

You can equate to life outside football imo. You get assaulted on a daily basis in the street, the police know its happening and never do anything prevent or punish anyone for, so you end up taking the law into your own hands and YOU end up in the pokey.

Not only that but its you that's labeled the mad man.

Why is the dude your display pic? 😂 

[bluenoz 30,681]

Our players have simply had enough. You just have to look at young Kent's reaction to see that. If the ref's aren't going to protect them, then the next action is to retaliate. It's a natural reaction. Broadfoot is a repeat offender and our players know it.

[graeme_4 34,351]

46 minutes ago, bigsasasfloopyhair said:

Are they allowed to take their pets onto the pitch? 

What kind of dog does Arfield have? 

Wooooooft! 

[Getstiffed 8,863]

Just now, McEwan's Lager said:

Why is the dude your display pic? 😂 

Who?

[Smile 26,600]

1 minute ago, McEwan's Lager said:

Why is the dude your display pic? 😂 

I wondered that as well.

[graeme_4 34,351]

36 minutes ago, Smile said:

What's Brown got to do with this? I would do him in the next tackle but make it look accidental it easy enough to do. Morelos is not even been cited for this as it was a nothing incident everyone on this thread wants to be offended about.

Is it aye? Should become a professional hurt guys while make it look like an accident coach in the EPL, good money to be made. 

[Smile 26,600]

1 minute ago, Getstiffed said:

Who?

James Black.

[Malvern 11,329]

2 hours ago, Blumhoilann said:

We are a footballing team and have been losing points because of the cloggers and the bias treatment of Refs.If we sign pure cloggers to deal wi the dirt in the league,would it change anything,certainly wouldn't change the attitude of Refs/SFA/SPFL towards our Club but would maybe give us fans some joy at seeing our players put the boot in for a change?

You know full well that one "Clogger" in our team would be sent off first tackle, this is not about even treatment it is about being fucked over for very little.

[Smile 26,600]

Just now, graeme_4 said:

Is it aye? Should become a professional hurt guys while make it look like an accident coach in the EPL, good money to be made. 

Anyone who's played football knows how to leave one on somebody while making it look like a legit tackle, players do it every week.

[Getstiffed 8,863]

2 minutes ago, Smile said:

James Black.

Never heard of him