Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Lloyd

***Official Rangers vs Hearts Match thread***

Recommended Posts


I hope im proved wrong, but I expect Candeias on by half time to revert back to normal shape. Or him and Lafferty on to go 4-4-2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Bronzy said:

 

 

Too defensive looking with only Kent to create and too many central midfielders.  Hopefully Grezda or Candeias on in the second half to change things or it's going to be a tough game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What’s the genuine point in signing players like Polster if they’re never going to play, especially when the other option is Jon Flanagan ffs. 

It’s an absolute waste of money again and again. 

McCauley, Polster, Flanagan are three off the top of my head that we literally have no need for and are probably costing us close to 30k a week

Zappa6995 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jelavic191 said:

Playing a diamond? 

I was thinking more a spade or a club. :happy:

Sorry mate not making the game tonight and not looking forward to having to watch a stream. :pipe:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Ibrox Derry said:

On a side note, I just want to say that the way our manager has conducted himself and dealt with the mhedia over the last few days has been nothing short of excellent.

Iam now even more convinced than before that he is the man to take us forward.

He has the class of a true Ranger.

I believe in him too, as does the majority of our fanbase mate. He just needs to start getting it right, pronto. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Prso's headband said:

What’s the genuine point in signing players like Polster if they’re never going to play, especially when the other option is Jon Flanagan ffs. 

It’s an absolute waste of money again and again. 

McCauley, Polster, Flanagan are three off the top of my head that we literally have no need for and are probably costing us close to 30k a week

Can Polster play left back?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Ibrox Derry said:

He looks like he is wearing that retro tracktop that was out a few years ago

Emillio is a well known Mexican Protestant bigot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Team has a look to me of being a bit lightweight.  Also has the appearance of Gerrard having given up on trying to get a Lafferty /Defoe strike partnership going.  I still don't get why Katic is not being preferred for a starting place given that he will be at Rangers next season (unless Gerrard knows something we don't).   Flanagan ….. well we can only hope because its boiled right down to relying on pure hope that playing him works.  

Seems to me like Defoe and Kent could be bounced about and muscled all over the place in this game.    Wonder what the odds are on (a) Kent landing one on a Hearts player and (b) us finishing the game still with 11 players on the pitch.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 35 Yard Dangerman said:

Genuinely canny work out how to change the profile picture though. Some shit about files being to big. Fuck knows man.

the one you sent me isnt even a jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Prso's headband said:

What’s the genuine point in signing players like Polster if they’re never going to play, especially when the other option is Jon Flanagan ffs. 

It’s an absolute waste of money again and again. 

McCauley, Polster, Flanagan are three off the top of my head that we literally have no need for and are probably costing us close to 30k a week

Something we’ve done forever it seems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

McGregor

Tav Goldson Worrall Flanagan 

Kamara Davis Jack

Kent Arfield

Defoe

 

 

Must be how we're lining up.

Flanagan. :megaanguish:

I appreciate that he's having to try something different because Defoe doesn't fit into the normal 4-3-3 system. 

We'd maybe be better off going down to 10 and playing with the 4-3-2. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...