Popular Post backup 4,724 Posted April 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 2, 2019 The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872. All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ? bob1873, CoopsLaud, alibali59 and 7 others 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddiqi_drinker 14,635 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 Can one club cite a player from another club? Thought that was a rugger thing and that it was all in the hands of the CO. No way we should let this go, if Halliday got a 2nd yellow why not Brown.... Bain was heavily involved in the 'stramash' at the end as was that cunt Lustig. Club need to back the manager and demand SFa action Blumhoilann 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post backup 4,724 Posted April 2, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted April 2, 2019 It is couched in terms that a Philadelphia lawyer would have trouble making sense of, it is very vague almost deliberately so...as to the citing procedure and who can do so ! Can the Compliance Officer take retrospective action for on-field incidents? The Compliance Officer can only raise a Fast Track Notice of Complaint and take retrospective action when an on field incident, or an exceptional part of an on field incident, has been unseen by the match officials. When investigating a potential Fast Track case, the Compliance Officer does not seek any opinion on the incident from the match officials, or ask them to reconsider any decision made. This has not changed. The decision of the referee regarding facts connected with play will always be respected in line with the Laws of the Game. It is for this reason that the disciplinary rules relating to retrospective action only come into effect when an incident, or part of an incident, is unseen by the match officials. When the match officials confirm an on field incident is unseen, the Compliance Officer seeks opinions from three independent experts. Those experts are drawn from a pool of former Category 1 referees, who are up to date with current refereeing guidelines. A Fast Track Notice of Complaint can only competently be raised when all three experts provide written evidence that the incident constituted a sending off offence. How does the Claims process work? In certain circumstances a player or a club can raise a Claim against a wrongful dismissal, mistaken identity, or wrongful caution for simulation. A specially trained Fast Track Tribunal determines whether there has been an obvious refereeing error based on the case put forward by the player/club, a factual report by the referee, and the relevant laws of the game. Every Fast Track Tribunal includes an expert on the Laws of the Game. If it is determined that an obvious refereeing error has been made, the disciplinary action taken by the match referee can be rescinded by the Fast Track Tribunal. It should be noted that the Compliance Officer is not involved in the Claims process. In addition, the disciplinary department itself does not make any decision on whether a sanction should be imposed, or a red card rescinded. Blumhoilann, Bobby Hume, scottyscott1963 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 I thought anybody could report an incident to the compliance officer? Bobby Hume 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 hours ago, backup said: The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872. All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ? Really? This is what we have become - wee clipes? Broon was pathetic - but we rose to the bait, there is only one way to get revenge and that is to beat them, win the league. This going around a weeping and wailing cause we got bullied and suckered is pathetic. Vanoli, CharlieT, StaunchLondonGer and 15 others 18 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol loyal 6,248 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 hours ago, backup said: The club has until 3pm today to cite broon and bain to the compliance officer for assaults on Alfie and Halliday, only SG from the club has highlighted broon's conduct, we have silence from the board the SLO and major fans shareholders 1872. All the while kennedy of celtic is commenting on how Kent will likely get a 3 game ban in the press, will no one from Ibrox defend us at all, on anything ? Kennedy did more than that, he actually praised his team and in particular browns behaviour! Apparently browns behaviour was “first class” and he “conducted himself very well”. Says everything about the standards at that scummy club. As for expecting our club to actually stand up for our fans and players, and take a stand against celtics behaviour, don’t be ridiculous! It will be dignified silence and letting them get away with whatever the fuck they want to ad walk all over us as usual, while they stick the boot into us as much as possible. Some things never change! Ibroxbornandbred and Blumhoilann 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
born a blue nose 90,380 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 49 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said: I thought anybody could report an incident to the compliance officer? So did I tbh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanjo 26,294 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 Dont know what to think of it to be honest. I don’t get the impression they will be looking forward to their game at Ibrox in any situation. We injured two of their ‘best players’ and rattled the rest. Brown getting that punch from Kent will last and will do a lot more to his so called hard man act. Much more so than his kick in the balls at Christmas We need to put what happened down to bad luck and push on with the game at Ibrox in mind. The scrap at the end pleased me so much as they know they are in for a war which I honestly believe they are not prepared for. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,254 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Ger_onimo said: I thought anybody could report an incident to the compliance officer? 42 minutes ago, born a blue nose said: So did I tbh Try it, I did, see how far you get. An auto email acknowledgement is the only communication you'll receive back no matter how often you attempt to follow it up. The procedure is a closed shop set up not to receive suggestions from out with their desired providers, ie the media. There's no specific public email address for compliance issues. The CO doesn't publicly provide her own email address. The perceived email of the CO (her name followed by the typical SFA add on) receives no response. Phone them and you're provided with the general email address below which receives only the auto acknowledgment I mentioned. As I say, closed shop. Give it a try... Contact Us The Scottish Football Association Hampden Park Glasgow G42 9AY Tel: +44 (0)141 616 6000 Fax: +44 (0)141 616 6001 Email: info@scottishfa.co.uk Ger_onimo and VentyFour 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 2, 2019 The whole compliance officer shite is set by beggars for the beggars It's also poison Will we ever get back to just being about the football Blueshoff, magic8ball, Blue Rino and 8 others 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Try it, I did, see how far you get. An auto email acknowledgement is the only communication you'll receive back no matter how often you attempt to follow it up. The procedure is a closed shop set up not to receive suggestions from out with their desired providers, ie the media. There's no specific public email address for compliance issues. The CO doesn't publicly provide her own email address. The perceived email of the CO (her name followed by the typical SFA add on) receives no response. Phone them and you're provided with the general email address below which receives only the auto acknowledgment I mentioned. As I say, closed shop. Give it a try... Contact Us The Scottish Football Association Hampden Park Glasgow G42 9AY Tel: +44 (0)141 616 6000 Fax: +44 (0)141 616 6001 Email: info@scottishfa.co.uk Shambles. Tbh it’s daft saying that anyone can report something anyway, it just opens it up to abuse and time wasting - but that applies to the media too. The club affected should have a limited period of time to raise a concern and that’s it. magic8ball 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,254 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said: Shambles. Tbh it’s daft saying that anyone can report something anyway, it just opens it up to abuse and time wasting - but that applies to the media too. The club affected should have a limited period of time to raise a concern and that’s it. As backup rightly says the whole thing is shrouded in secrecy / ambiguity. Nothing in print says it's only red card offences yet this is what is commonly stated by the MSM and is current practice. Anyone can allegedly report an issue, but hard when no letterbox on the brick wall. Everything done behind closed doors and anonymously with ex ref panels demonstrates zero transparency. It's more sham than shambles. scottyscott1963 and Bears r us 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,186 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Ger_onimo said: I thought anybody could report an incident to the compliance officer? This precident has been set yep Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BlueSuedeSambas 53,548 Posted April 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 2, 2019 Our support let Brown occupy far too much of their headspace. It seems there’s barely a day that goes past without somebody mentioning him. RJMcGregor, CoopsLaud, BouncyBluenose87 and 9 others 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted April 2, 2019 Author Share Posted April 2, 2019 3 hours ago, backup said: Can the Compliance Officer take retrospective action for on-field incidents? The Compliance Officer can only raise a Fast Track Notice of Complaint and take retrospective action when an on field incident, or an exceptional part of an on field incident, has been unseen by the match officials. I believe that the word unseen is the loophole the sfa has missed, if the ref has missed broon raking Alfie and bain hooking Halliday, both are actionable. On the other hand if the ref/linesman was to confirm both incidents as seen and no action was deemed neccessary, that would be an absolute sensation, the club must take down the white flag and raise The Flag of the Union and fight thes blatant injustices all the way. As an aside will the sfa censure broon for incitement for ignoring the police instructions given, doubt it, and for the simple reason that our board refuses to seek justice or even parity on these issues. All I do know is that before murray back in the day, The Rangers board would have roared and the sfa would have shat it, channged days indeed. scottyscott1963 and Bobby Hume 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 10 minutes ago, backup said: I believe that the word unseen is the loophole the sfa has missed, if the ref has missed broon raking Alfie and bain hooking Halliday, both are actionable. On the other hand if the ref/linesman was to confirm both incidents as seen and no action was deemed neccessary, that would be an absolute sensation, the club must take down the white flag and raise The Flag of the Union and fight thes blatant injustices all the way. As an aside will the sfa censure broon for incitement for ignoring the police instructions given, doubt it, and for the simple reason that our board refuses to seek justice or even parity on these issues. All I do know is that before murray back in the day, The Rangers board would have roared and the sfa would have shat it, channged days indeed. As the league is as good as won now . I think the comp officer WILL take action against Brown , to be seen as an unbiased neutral for next season . Maybe that is why the scum went on the defensive with him yesterday . Marks my words . Some scum player will be punished soon as they have never been sighted and it's looking too obvious now . Well making sure it doesn't hurt them too much obviously Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted April 2, 2019 Author Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: As the league is as good as won now . I think the comp officer WILL take action against Brown , to be seen as an unbiased neutral for next season . Maybe that is why the scum went on the defensive with him yesterday . Marks my words . Some scum player will be punished soon as they have never been sighted and it's looking too obvious now . Well making sure it doesn't hurt them too much Police have spoken to prosecutors about Scott Brown's behaviour during Old Firm game. It comes as the celtic captain was accused of deliberately 'goading' rival Rangers players at the game at Parkhead on Sunday. He faced widespread criticism following the incident, including from Steven Gerrard who said he 'would've gone' for the player. However, a spokeswoman for Police Scotland said chiefs were content with the incident. John Hartson: The Rangers players need to own their actions - Scott Brown did nothing wrong She added: "After consulting with the Crown Office and reviewing the circumstances, Police Scotland is content that the actions of players at the celtic v Rangers SPFL match on Sunday March 31 2019 were in the wider context of a sporting event. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, backup said: Police have spoken to prosecutors about Scott Brown's behaviour during Old Firm game. It comes as the celtic captain was accused of deliberately 'goading' rival Rangers players at the game at Parkhead on Sunday. He faced widespread criticism following the incident, including from Steven Gerrard who said he 'would've gone' for the player. However, a spokeswoman for Police Scotland said chiefs were content with the incident. John Hartson: The Rangers players need to own their actions - Scott Brown did nothing wrong She added: "After consulting with the Crown Office and reviewing the circumstances, Police Scotland is content that the actions of players at the celtic v Rangers SPFL match on Sunday March 31 2019 were in the wider context of a sporting event. The gestapo and PF in this Country are rhancid double standard scum bags My earlier post still applies . Some mutant will be sighted soon and be punished for a meaningless fixture . While the bheastly club will be all up in arms about it scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,254 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 Just now, backup said: Police have spoken to prosecutors about Scott Brown's behaviour during Old Firm game. It comes as the celtic captain was accused of deliberately 'goading' rival Rangers players at the game at Parkhead on Sunday. He faced widespread criticism following the incident, including from Steven Gerrard who said he 'would've gone' for the player. However, a spokeswoman for Police Scotland said chiefs were content with the incident. John Hartson: The Rangers players need to own their actions - Scott Brown did nothing wrong She added: "After consulting with the Crown Office and reviewing the circumstances, Police Scotland is content that the actions of players at the celtic v Rangers SPFL match on Sunday March 31 2019 were in the wider context of a sporting event. Which is fine in the context of not wanting Police involved in footballing matters which I don't. But where our fans are penned in, unable to leave, and are then goaded and provoked contrary to Police guidance provided to players and clubs, then the provocateur should face the wrath of the SFA plus everyone not wanting to see carnage. Otherwise why follow the guidelines which are meant to minimise risk of incidents at games, its hollow words. Bobby Hume and scottyscott1963 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted April 2, 2019 Author Share Posted April 2, 2019 It is more than surprising we have some who with our board still follow the false God of quiet dignity, little wonder we get shat on from a great height ! eejay the dj, scottyscott1963, Bobby Hume and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 hours ago, born a blue nose said: So did I tbh They can. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,839 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 32 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: As the league is as good as won now . I think the comp officer WILL take action against Brown , to be seen as an unbiased neutral for next season . Maybe that is why the scum went on the defensive with him yesterday . Marks my words . Some scum player will be punished soon as they have never been sighted and it's looking too obvious now . Well making sure it doesn't hurt them too much obviously I agree that there will be something done to attempt to show parity . But knowing the shambles of the Scottish Fenians Association .They are more likely to let Kent off eejay the dj 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,438 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 I used to laugh like fuck and sing songs about them crying weeping and wailing during our 9iar it felt wonderful, truly it did. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,254 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 17 minutes ago, The Dude said: They can. In theory. But in practice? backup 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,592 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 Scott Brown will get a token ban which will mean nothing just to show they are trying to be fair-minded. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.