RangersMedia 35,961 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 If it wasn't seen then why was he booked? What could the referee or assistant possibly have seen other than the incident. Flannigan elbowed him, I can't see what else it could it have been seen as. I mean he should have been sent off, we really couldn't complain if he had, but for me the referee seen and dealt with it. The SFA do seem to make it up as they go along. I said earlier in the season, this re-referreeing of games is a slippery slope, and it realy doesn't sit right with me a panel over ruling referees decisions. Bristol loyal and Copland bear 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWR1979 1,953 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 We are 6 points from the filth and we have the worst disciplinary record in the league that's not even mentioning the decisions which have went against us in games. They need called out and highlighted it's been going on to long now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 2 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said: Shock and awe for a change from the club. Now follow through with this and nail the cunts to the floor. This and 2 hours ago, Sparkle said: But will they? All too often we get ‘the statement’ then absolutely nothing to back it up. This. We will just have to hope that this time they do carry it through. I'll be amazed if they do. Sparkle and Courtyard Bear 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Will Follow Rangers 12,892 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 I'm sure @backup will be along to commend the club on hitting the nail on the head with a good strong statement. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post the cry was no 3,012 Posted May 14, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted May 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, siddiqi_drinker said: BB - posted this n the other thread --- cunts are breaking their own rules Tuesday 14 May 2019 Fast Track Notice of Complaint | Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC Player: Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC Match: Rangers FC v celtic FC Sunday 12 May 2019 Competition: Scottish Premiership Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached: Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or any other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed, the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player. Any Fast Track Notice of Complaint alleging a breach of this Rule shall be Determined by a Fast Track Tribunal subject to the provisions of Section 13. Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Thursday 16 May 2019 WELL OBVIOUSLY THE INCIDENT WAS SEEN or he would not have received a yellow card. WE MUST APPEAL - APPEAL Three times this season this rule has been used to upgrade yellow cards to red cards Scott McKenna, Darnell Johnson and Jon Flanagan. Guess the opponent in all 3 cases??? Hibs issued a statement similar to ours after Johnson was cited as they were stunned that neither of our two friends Brown and Simunovic were cited for worse offences. Both of these cunts are more than a little handy with their elbows but have never been cited When the mhedia brush it aside and dismiss it as efficiently as Andy Walker did on Sunday while having a meltdown about Flanagan then trial by biased media can make a material difference points wise over a season ronniescu, Courtyard Bear, siddiqi_drinker and 9 others 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 5 hours ago, grant_rfc said: https://www.BOYCOTT THIS LINK/sport/football/football-news/seething-Rangers-issue-stinging-sfa-15842346 A club spokesperson said: ‘Once again, there seems intent to change the decision of a Referee in a match involving Rangers. There seems to be a steady erosion of respect for Scotland’s Referees and the authority they are meant to enjoy under Rule 5 of the Laws of the Game. The decisions of Referees regarding facts connected with play are meant to be final but Referees are now routinely invited to change their decisions after a game has finished. It is particularly shocking that another Rangers’ player has been singled out for retrospective action and issued with a notice of complaint while Jozo Simunovic, the celtic player who used an elbow to fell Jermain Defoe, has escaped any kind of censure. Why did one incident escape punishment while the other is now deemed worthy of a red card? We cannot understand how these two incidents could be studied yet only one be considered worthy of punishment. It seems as if Rangers’ players are being held to a different code of conduct from players at other clubs. We shall vigorously defend Mr Flanagan and have also asked for full transparency on what matters are brought forward for retrospective action. Are those decisions being made even-handedly?’ Good statement. I would like to know who is making the decisions to cite our players, as the CO has no involvement in football decisions as stated at the time of her employment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 4 hours ago, wewillfollowrangers said: I'm sure @backup will be along to commend the club on hitting the nail on the head with a good strong statement. Talk is cheap, as you obviously know. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyscott1963 17,999 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 The last 3 CO's have all been bheggar fans and have used this position to cite us far too many times for it to be coincidence. That is what the board should concentrate on. How the fuck can she be impartial,when they need something to deflect from separate entity fc and the daily news about the paedophile ring. You have to admit they sure know how to deflect shite. We complain and are made to look like the problem. If we don't say GTF this time,the tramps will sail to 10 of this I have absolutely no doubt. You can see the ugly bastard sitting across from lawell and nodding her thick fuckin head. Unless the board tell them to GTF,we as fans will have to sook it up. eejay the dj and slimjim1690 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammer93 15,023 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Sportscene fawned over the Flanagan incident for about 5 minutes and looked at it 6 or 7 times but the simunovic incident didn't even merit a mention....here lies the biggest problem...it is most definitely trial by sportscene...I have said it countless times now this season but they genuinely aren't even hiding the bias now. Reformation Bear, Bears, scottyscott1963 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakbear 3,563 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 It’s a decent enough statement and we definitely need to fight back over this massive inequality. It’s just unfortunate that in this particular case it was an absolute stonewall red card. The Compliance Officer position should be abolished. It’s fucking bollocks. Rather than hiring a complete amateur to review amateur refereeing decisions why not just employ professional referees beararse and scottyscott1963 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlearyEyedBear 4,148 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 The googly-eyed presenter, and the two no-mark pundits wanked themselves stupid to it. Selective editing at it's finest. scottyscott1963, eejay the dj, Negri's lovechild and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Bakbear said: It’s a decent enough statement and we definitely need to fight back over this massive inequality. It’s just unfortunate that in this particular case it was an absolute stonewall red card. The Compliance Officer position should be abolished. It’s fucking bollocks. Rather than hiring a complete amateur to review amateur refereeing decisions why not just employ professional referees Its not whether it was a red card (the referee deemed it a yellow card offence) its the lack of parity, Simunovic was equally as guilty and hasn't been cited. As was stated earlier in the thread its a 3 taig panel that makes it up as they go along. I think the CO refers incidents, hence no referral of their thugs. eejay the dj, Bakbear, scottyscott1963 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
soulboy 2,513 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Is this not something we could take to court of arbitration for sport (CAS) ? Let's face it the SFA will do sweet fa to appease us. scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Bakbear said: It’s a decent enough statement and we definitely need to fight back over this massive inequality. It’s just unfortunate that in this particular case it was an absolute stonewall red card. The Compliance Officer position should be abolished. It’s fucking bollocks. Rather than hiring a complete amateur to review amateur refereeing decisions why not just employ professional referees They do, the 3 man panel she sends any complaint to are ex professional Refs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakbear 3,563 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 24 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: They do, the 3 man panel she sends any complaint to are ex professional Refs. I get that. But a. There are no full time professional referees in Scotland they are part timers. and b. I mean on the field instead of refereeing after the fact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1963 896 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 8 hours ago, BlueBeard said: Just watched the bbc highlights program, after the initial incident, it was shown another five times during the highlights, then another five while sitting discussing the incident afterwards , in contrast the elbow on Defoe was shown only once after the initial incident, and not even mentioned afterwards. Trial by the bbc is certainly working,. Thats what we need clarified as to how the compliance officer becomes aware of incidents ,and then make sure we are treated evenly and fairly ,theres plenty of examples of Browns elbowing and stamping ,also Craig Gordon has several examples of kung fu kicks.These tend to be airbrushed over , with at worst a 'not for me' comment from an embittered biased pundit . BlueBeard 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Copland bear 7,966 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 I thought the uses stated if you hot booked during the game like Flanagan then that was the end of the matter regardless. Have the rules now changed? If Flanagan was not booked then they could hand him a 2 game ban no quibbles butbthe fact the ref saw it and booked him meant they could not touch him. Shoot me down if I am wrong , but when where these rules changed? And what about the cunt that elbowed Defoe and never even got booked ? Oh I forgot Defoes head clashed with his elbow so should be a 2 game ban for Defoe then. As others have said we cannot back down and refuse to honour any tv deal next season by saying the cameras are banned from Ibrox and tell the SFA to forget the Scottish cup also as we will not be taking part, Watch them come running to sort it out then, and tell them if it ever happens again then we will ban all tv cameras regardless of the tv deal they have. bornabear 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakbear 3,563 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 hour ago, RFC Eagle said: Its not whether it was a red card (the referee deemed it a yellow card offence) its the lack of parity, Simunovic was equally as guilty and hasn't been cited. As was stated earlier in the thread its a 3 taig panel that makes it up as they go along. I think the CO refers incidents, hence no referral of their thugs. I agree. But you can’t make that case while saying “we will defend mr Flanagan”. You can’t defend Flanagan as it is a red card all day long. Attack the process. Challenge the process. Seek the clarity of the process and ensure it’s transparency. Even insist the process be abolished. But don’t say we will defend Mr Flanagan. It’s a losing battle to defend the indefensible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabc10000 5,060 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 3 hours ago, scottyscott1963 said: The last 3 CO's have all been bheggar fans and have used this position to cite us far too many times for it to be coincidence. That is what the board should concentrate on. How the fuck can she be impartial,when they need something to deflect from separate entity fc and the daily news about the paedophile ring. You have to admit they sure know how to deflect shite. We complain and are made to look like the problem. If we don't say GTF this time,the tramps will sail to 10 of this I have absolutely no doubt. You can see the ugly bastard sitting across from lawell and nodding her thick fuckin head. Unless the board tell them to GTF,we as fans will have to sook it up. What's even more staggering is that all the teams in the league have been cited on numerous occasions as well while they have never had a single one all season I believe. Something is not right no matter what way you look at it scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabc10000 5,060 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Out of interest what was the 2 game ban for? Was it violent conduct? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 37 minutes ago, Bakbear said: I get that. But a. There are no full time professional referees in Scotland they are part timers. and b. I mean on the field instead of refereeing after the fact. Good luck with any idea of a full time professional Ref when they are getting their games reReffed every weekend. scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronniescu 2,949 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 9 hours ago, 6superbarry6 said: That fenian whore needs driven out Is she actually a season ticket holder? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 We have lost points this season because of the media/ sfa compliance officer campaign against us. Refs are influenced by it and we are getting refereed in a different perspective from every other team, during and after a game. I would support Rangers going to court of arbitration. scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakbear 3,563 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: Good luck with any idea of a full time professional Ref when they are getting their games reReffed every weekend. Yeah. Which is why I say abolish the re-Reffing and instead get professional full time referees preferably with VAR. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,438 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 9 hours ago, Drunk and disorderly. said: There was fuck all in it. Even downy broon didn't make much of it at the time. Simply a badly timed jump. Anyow, should have broken his jaw. Good to see our club stand up for what is right. Trial by biased tv video yet again. Nobody jumped mate. Flannigan caught him a good one and should have been sent off. No point in saying otherwise The issue is retrospective action yet again and simunovic’s assault on Defoe to show fair refereeing scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.