Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
grant_rfc

Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation

Recommended Posts

 
 
 
 
 
 
3
1 hour ago, SonOfLuther said:
ur ago, SonOfLuther said:

The brass neck of the cunts.

 

celtic have branded Jon Flanagan’s Old Firm appeal win “a huge embarrassment” for the Scottish game.

The Rangers defender was charged by the SFA compliance office Claire Whyte for decking Scott Brown at Ibrox last weekend

Ref Kevin Clancy booked Flanagan for elbowing the celtic skipper during the first half of Gers’ Old Firm win.

But three former refs reviewed footage and all agreed the Ibrox defender should have been sent off by the whistler.

Flanagan faced a two-match ban but an independent panel cleared him at Hampden today – leaving the Hoops amazed.

A celtic spokesperson said: “The whole matter is a huge embarrassment for Scottish football.”

Only saw the bold headline --- thought they were discussing McCafferty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our bench to man shouted "it's fuckin him again" when that clown brown ran into Flanagan flailing his arms trying to push Flanno (sorry about that) but that's what Stevie G calls him.
My new screen saver will be Flanagan winding the bastard up with the big cheesy grin :mutley:,and probably telling him "that was a fuckin corker ya cunt"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, scottyscott1963 said:

Our bench to man shouted "it's fuckin him again" when that clown brown ran into Flannigan flailing his arms trying to push Flanno (sorry about that) but that's what Stevie G calls him.
My new screen saver will be Flannigan winding the bastard up with the big cheesy grin :mutley:,and probably telling him "that was a fuckin corker ya cunt"

prefer FLANAGAN myself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

Might not be the 3 man panel, if the decision isnt unanimous then the original decision is kept, 

I think anyway

Aye, I think it has to be unanimous. A 3 man panel for original decision then an independent panel (must mean not all kaflic refs) for the appeal. The whole system is a farce. We should appeal every decision that is made against us even if we think it is right. Fuck them!

scottyscott1963 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Drunk and disorderly. said:

Aye, I think it has to be unanimous. A 3 man panel for original decision then an independent panel (must mean not all kaflic refs) for the appeal. The whole system is a farce. We should appeal every decision that is made against us even if we think it is right. Fuck them!

That will be that original 3 man panels freebies fucked.
No more free loading for those 3 cunts.

More of a case they got caught with their fingers in the till and were caught red handed.
Would pish myself laughing if we issued a statement on the tramps "embarrassing scottish football" statement,with an add on of "dry yer fuckin slitty jap eyes". :mutley: 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Laudrup1984 said:

The irony after tlb was greeting saying all we do is make statements. These cunts are the statement champions, the mad ambulance chasing bastards!

They are statement champions until the subject matter changes to endemic sex crimes that happened at their rancid club over the years....then the tumble weeds start blowing around the east end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what is particularly galling about the incident is that it was an arm to the chest, no contact at all was made to the face but Brown went down 1. he did not need to and 2. he went down holding his face.

 

This incident should be about cheats trying to get penalties and ruining the game, to call it any other way illustrates that 1. you have an agenda or 2. you truly do not understand football

 

can i get an amen?

OzzyJoe likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Friday 17 May 2019

Fast Track Notice of Complaint | Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC

Player: Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC

Match: Rangers FC v celtic FC Sunday 12 May 2019

Competition: Scottish Premiership

Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or any other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed, the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player.

Any Fast Track Notice of Complaint alleging a breach of this Rule shall be Determined by a Fast Track Tribunal subject to the provisions of Section 13.

Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Friday 17 May 2019

Outcome: Dismissed.

 

See the bit in bold. Wonder if that was reason it was dismissed on appeal. They wrote the charge. Ref clearly saw it. Case dismissed?? 

Would be good to see the written reasons but their website only provides the summary above.

HG5 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, evenstevens said:

Friday 17 May 2019

Fast Track Notice of Complaint | Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC

Player: Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC

Match: Rangers FC v celtic FC Sunday 12 May 2019

Competition: Scottish Premiership

Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or any other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed, the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player.

Any Fast Track Notice of Complaint alleging a breach of this Rule shall be Determined by a Fast Track Tribunal subject to the provisions of Section 13.

Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Friday 17 May 2019

Outcome: Dismissed.

 

See the bit in bold. Wonder if that was reason it was dismissed on appeal. They wrote the charge. Ref clearly saw it. Case dismissed?? 

Would be good to see the written reasons but their website only provides the summary above.

That looks like it should be it - so why should it ever have got that far, as it was clearly dealt with on the day?

Just making the rules up as they go along, where it involves us.....

Also, there are that many laptop (& real) lawyers over on the scum side, who must know the rules by now - they’re probably making spurious complaints, simply so they can be offended when it doesn’t go their way.

Reformation Bear likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, evenstevens said:

Friday 17 May 2019

Fast Track Notice of Complaint | Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC

Player: Jonathon Flanagan, Player, Rangers FC

Match: Rangers FC v celtic FC Sunday 12 May 2019

Competition: Scottish Premiership

Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or any other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed, the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player.

Any Fast Track Notice of Complaint alleging a breach of this Rule shall be Determined by a Fast Track Tribunal subject to the provisions of Section 13.

Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Friday 17 May 2019

Outcome: Dismissed.

 

See the bit in bold. Wonder if that was reason it was dismissed on appeal. They wrote the charge. Ref clearly saw it. Case dismissed?? 

Would be good to see the written reasons but their website only provides the summary above.

It appears the SFA and their employees don't know their own rules. Sheer incompetence once more.

Or maybe when it's Rangers they like to rewrite them or even make them up as they go along. Surely not 

Reformation Bear and HG5 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...