Popular Post Sket 13,610 Posted September 13, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 13, 2019 54 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said: Plenty on Twitter about Brown’s sister, Burns, O’Donnell, Doyle etc and same with them and Cooper, Ricksen, the 66 etc. Nobody should be banned for a social media post tbh, think the whole grassing thing is weird as well And neither should the boy outside Ibrox. 1690tamRFC, RFC55, Tiger Shaw and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/ https://www.BOYCOTT THIS LINK/ Main story on The Sun and the Record online. Think we can put the 'equality' of the treatment of both clubs on these issue to bed now. Where I doubt there will be equality is in the actions of the clubs. Rangers were quite right to ban the idiot at the stadium. I very much doubt celtic will follow suit. Negri's lovechild and Smile 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 70,937 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, Sket said: And neither should the boy outside Ibrox. Agreed, but I understand why he was. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 2 hours ago, Rfc52 said: So works have to be bombarded with emails over a guy who might or might no work there? The guys a fenian mess and will hopefully get his baws toed. It's a disgrace what he's put but don't get why works should be bombarded and our support looking like idiots emailing the wrong people. It's just stupid In my own opinion, rather than bears or any person saying they have sent an email to the offenders "work place" just email to query and inform then if they tell you that the person is or isn't working there, no harm done, no one is making a fool of themself. It's just passing on information about their possible employee. I personally would not want someone working for or with me if they are in a position of looking after the interests of vulnerable people knowing that they hold this type of thought within them. What are they saying about the vulnerable people they are responsible for, if that is the case? You can say it's wrong to inform their work...I would want to know who I am working with if we find out that type of information. Probably more so I can run right through them for being a vile wanker. Smile and LiverpoolBlue 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,592 Posted September 13, 2019 Author Share Posted September 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said: In my own opinion, rather than bears or any person saying they have sent an email to the offenders "work place" just email to query and inform then if they tell you that the person is or isn't working there, no harm done, no one is making a fool of themself. It's just passing on information about their possible employee. I personally would not want someone working for or with me if they are in a position of looking after the interests of vulnerable people knowing that they hold this type of thought within them. What are they saying about the vulnerable people they are responsible for, if that is the case? You can say it's wrong to inform their work...I would want to know who I am working with if we find out that type of information. Probably more so I can run right through them for being a vile wanker. I will print a small retraction in the corner of the page somewhere on the forum tomorrow as I was wrong about his work place. 1690tamRFC 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterC 12,186 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 7 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said: In my own opinion, rather than bears or any person saying they have sent an email to the offenders "work place" just email to query and inform then if they tell you that the person is or isn't working there, no harm done, no one is making a fool of themself. It's just passing on information about their possible employee. I personally would not want someone working for or with me if they are in a position of looking after the interests of vulnerable people knowing that they hold this type of thought within them. What are they saying about the vulnerable people they are responsible for, if that is the case? You can say it's wrong to inform their work...I would want to know who I am working with if we find out that type of information. Probably more so I can run right through them for being a vile wanker. The point he makes if you bother to read the post, is that folk were emailing a completely different place of work to where the real culprit works and had assumed someone with the same name was that person. How would you feel if someone with the same name as you did something wrong, and then lots of folk make the mistake of thinking it was you, bombard your work with emails etc saying you had done whatever had happened? I agree with your point about making employers aware of their employees doing shit like this, but for goodness sake make sure you've got the right person instead of some other person who happens to share the same name TheCutch 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 22 minutes ago, Smile said: I will print a small retraction in the corner of the page somewhere on the forum tomorrow as I was wrong about his work place. Haha wouldn't worry about it. Didn't know who done it, just giving my own opinion on the matter re reporting to workplaces Smile 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tannerall 25,935 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Stupid, stupid thing this boy has done, regardless of his allegiances. Will have caused a lot of pain to many, especially Fernando's family and close friends. I agree with @Rfc52 on both points. His employers have done no wrong, so should not be brought in to it, and the facts themselves should determine the punishment. And given the seriousness of what he did and and potential reaction and incitement of others, all that is going to take a lot of investigation of his motivation, character and background including family and acquaintances. And when this investigation is complete, the courts will hopefully decide suitable and proper punishment, a punishment that will also hopefully send out a clear message to others to behave responsibly, and influence them not to do this sort of thing. I think a suitable punishment is what most posters want, hopefully the court makes the right decision. In the meantime, all we can hope is that there is a common condemnation of these type of actions by all. With no knowledge of the guys character and background, we can only speculate, but it would look like he is in one hell of a lot of trouble. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,592 Posted September 13, 2019 Author Share Posted September 13, 2019 Just now, Sweettartangirl said: Haha wouldn't worry about it. Didn't know who done it, just giving my own opinion on the matter re reporting to workplaces I was only joking if posters reading that story think aww how can I feel sorry for the taig, fuck them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 34 minutes ago, MisterC said: The point he makes if you bother to read the post, is that folk were emailing a completely different place of work to where the real culprit works and had assumed someone with the same name was that person. How would you feel if someone with the same name as you did something wrong, and then lots of folk make the mistake of thinking it was you, bombard your work with emails etc saying you had done whatever had happened? I agree with your point about making employers aware of their employees doing shit like this, but for goodness sake make sure you've got the right person instead of some other person who happens to share the same name Bollocks to it. I can't be mithered with this. Okay you are right and everyone else is wrong. I did read the post though...that much you are very wrong on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle 53,252 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said: Bollocks to it. I can't be mithered with this. Okay you are right and everyone else is wrong. I did read the post though...that much you are very wrong on. Quick editing there 16BlueSherbert90 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Sparkle said: Quick editing there Had to be done. Can't be bothered getting into piddly little debates tonight. It's the weekend:) Sparkle 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tannerall 25,935 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 12 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said: Bollocks to it. I can't be mithered with this. Okay you are right and everyone else is wrong. I did read the post though...that much you are very wrong on. Brilliant post, Solely for the reason I'd never heard the word mithered before. verb NORTHERN ENGLISH make a fuss; moan. "oh men—don't they mither?" 16BlueSherbert90 and MisterC 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,592 Posted September 13, 2019 Author Share Posted September 13, 2019 1 hour ago, MisterC said: The point he makes if you bother to read the post, is that folk were emailing a completely different place of work to where the real culprit works and had assumed someone with the same name was that person. How would you feel if someone with the same name as you did something wrong, and then lots of folk make the mistake of thinking it was you, bombard your work with emails etc saying you had done whatever had happened? I agree with your point about making employers aware of their employees doing shit like this, but for goodness sake make sure you've got the right person instead of some other person who happens to share the same name Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, tannerall said: Brilliant post, Solely for the reason I'd never heard the word mithered before. verb NORTHERN ENGLISH make a fuss; moan. "oh men—don't they mither?" You're lucky I'm in a good mood tonight...I was all for quoting you on your previous post. Then I changed my mind but for the record, there is part of your post I completely disagree with. That will be kept for another day when I'm grumpy:) tannerall 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Zetland 5,830 Posted September 13, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 13, 2019 Disgusting comment by a disgusting individual. No good should come to him. 35 Yard Dangerman, Bears r us, Paisley Blue Loyal and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
East Enclosure Row N 2,799 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Disgusting, but a big part of me thinks publicising it just gives this weasel the attention he desperately seeks? The news is now well spread, and we all know what he is, so how about - just lock this thread and forget about the wee prick? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sket 13,610 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 1 hour ago, ForeverAndEver said: Agreed, but I understand why he was. To appease fenians. We're the best in the world at that. sassaaaa, ForeverAndEver, 1690tamRFC and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1690tamRFC 5,001 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Sket said: To appease fenians. We're the best in the world at that. Sickeningly correct mate. Leighton loyal 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beararse 6,323 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 This sort of stuff has went on for as long as I can remember. This vile wee fanny happened to be stupid enough to post it online. He's not the first and won’t be the last unfortunately, on either side! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger4life_1872 29,309 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 12 hours ago, Sweettartangirl said: In my own opinion, rather than bears or any person saying they have sent an email to the offenders "work place" just email to query and inform then if they tell you that the person is or isn't working there, no harm done, no one is making a fool of themself. It's just passing on information about their possible employee. I personally would not want someone working for or with me if they are in a position of looking after the interests of vulnerable people knowing that they hold this type of thought within them. What are they saying about the vulnerable people they are responsible for, if that is the case? You can say it's wrong to inform their work...I would want to know who I am working with if we find out that type of information. Probably more so I can run right through them for being a vile wanker. I obv dont know for definite but I imagine with gdpr being such a big thing now that a company wouldn't/couldn't tell you if somebody worked there or not Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 10,584 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 12 hours ago, Sket said: And neither should the boy outside Ibrox. Of course he should have been ffs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsasasfloppyhair 13,310 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 Can’t have banter anymore in this PC world. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueThunder 8,439 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 1 hour ago, bigsasasfloopyhair said: Can’t have banter anymore in this PC world. Banter? 😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsasasfloppyhair 13,310 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 13 minutes ago, BlueThunder said: Banter? 😂 This, Scott Brown, people just want to offended. Why cant it just be that we hate each other and have freedom of speech. ForeverAndEver 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.