Tom English Kilmarnock game comments - Club 1872 Statement

[Sket 9,570]

BBC employees drag our clubs name through the mud.

We release a statement.

BBC 'apologise'.

BBC employees drag our clubs name through the mud.

We release a statement.

BBC apologise.....

 

And round and round it goes.

Wish we would grow a set and fucking stand up for ourselves,these fenian bastards slap us about while laughing in our faces.

[BridgeIsBlue 40,150]

Fenian bastard. 

[yoga bear 20]

15 hours ago, Ger_onimo said:

Yeah, completely ignoring the ridiculous bias, his writing is just terrible.

Yes, he's made Pseud's Corner in this week's Private Eye for his report on Scotland's game with Japan in the Rugby World Cup. Says it all really!

[GersInCanada 740]

These statements followed by apologies are put out simply to damage the club. BBC Scotland knows this and reporters bias are overlooked.

There must be enough of these incidents by now for the clubs lawyers to make a compelling case to the BBC and failing suitable action from them to go to court.

[glasgow argyle 526]

3 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

These statements followed by apologies are put out simply to damage the club. BBC Scotland knows this and reporters bias are overlooked.

There must be enough of these incidents by now for the clubs lawyers to make a compelling case to the BBC and failing suitable action from them to go to court.

The more complaints sent to BBC h.q. the better, surely they must take heed if enough legitimate complaints are upheld. 

[McEwan's Lager 7,472]

15 minutes ago, yoga bear said:

Yes, he's made Pseud's Corner in this week's Private Eye for his report on Scotland's game with Japan in the Rugby World Cup. Says it all really!

What does it say?

[MisterC 3,834]

 

 

[BLUEDIGNITY 12,273]

This is only window dressing, whatever ‘punishment’ they allegedly dole out publicly to the waltzer spinner behind the scenes they’ll give him a rise, an award and a promotion for a job done.

[They Gnu 4,374]

45 minutes ago, Sket said:

BBC employees drag our clubs name through the mud.

We release a statement.

BBC 'apologise'.

BBC employees drag our clubs name through the mud.

We release a statement.

BBC apologise.....

 

And round and round it goes.

Wish we would grow a set and fucking stand up for ourselves,these fenian bastards slap us about while laughing in our faces.

What would you like to see happen?

[They Gnu 4,374]

4 minutes ago, MisterC said:

 

 

Fuck me that’s dire.

[chris182 2,403]

48 minutes ago, Sket said:

BBC employees drag our clubs name through the mud.

We release a statement.

BBC 'apologise'.

BBC employees drag our clubs name through the mud.

We release a statement.

BBC apologise.....

 

And round and round it goes.

Wish we would grow a set and fucking stand up for ourselves,these fenian bastards slap us about while laughing in our faces.

Start writing legal letters, the only way to stop it

[chris182 2,403]

30 minutes ago, glasgow argyle said:

The more complaints sent to BBC h.q. the better, surely they must take heed if enough legitimate complaints are upheld. 

Years and years of complaints suggest otherwise

[Sket 9,570]

7 minutes ago, They Gnu said:

What would you like to see happen?

I'd like to see them all hung as half time entertainment.

[They Gnu 4,374]

3 minutes ago, Sket said:

I'd like to see them all hung as half time entertainment.

Wouldn’t we all mate.

very hard to fight the MSM as obviously they control the media, except BBC where we, the fans, simply have to stop paying the licence, it’s the only leverage we have.

[BLUEDIGNITY 12,273]

3 minutes ago, chris182 said:

Years and years of complaints suggest otherwise

Correct years of bits of paper and toothless statements amount to a hill of beans whereas the athletic wings tactic of threatening with menace works every time. 

[Jakes Pal 1,472]

Just now, They Gnu said:

Wouldn’t we all mate.

very hard to fight the MSM as the control the media, except BBC where we, the fans, simply have to stop paying the licence.

The way things are going with regards to peoples feelings about the licence fee, it may not be around too much longer anyway. In the good old days when the UK BBC was fair and impartial then people were willing to pay, however the obvious right on,  lefty attitude of the BBC is becoming more and more obvious by the day, and people (especially those with different political views) will not be prepared to publicly fund a politically motivated and biased national broadcaster.

[They Gnu 4,374]

3 minutes ago, Jakes Pal said:

The way things are going with regards to peoples feelings about the licence fee, it may not be around too much longer anyway. In the good old days when the UK BBC was fair and impartial then people were willing to pay, however the obvious right on,  lefty attitude of the BBC is becoming more and more obvious by the day, and people (especially those with different political views) will not be prepared to publicly fund a politically motivated and biased national broadcaster.

I could paper my lounge with the threatening letters the cunts have sent me but they’re getting heehaw off me.

[Jakes Pal 1,472]

1 minute ago, They Gnu said:

I could paper my lounge with the threatening letters the cunts have sent me but they’re getting heehaw off me.

"Paper my lounge", stealth I am a posh cunt with a lounge post.😎

[They Gnu 4,374]

14 minutes ago, Jakes Pal said:

"Paper my lounge", stealth I am a posh cunt with a lounge post.😎

Sorry about delay in replying I was in the en-suite shower room.😉😜

[To Be A Ranger 4,032]

The views expressed in the article are those of the contributor and not the BBC.

This is a common excuse of the BBC. They don't care about the integrity of their employees or what they write. All they want is hits. They just want high numbers of people viewing.

BBC Scotland is Biased and Bigoted. There's no chance of winning a court prosection against a journo just because of something he wrote. The only thing that will make them think twice about reporting lies is losing their jobs. And that is not going to happen.

[SteveEarle 4,314]

1 hour ago, They Gnu said:

Sorry about delay in replying I was in the en-suite shower room.😉😜

I also missed this post as I was nipping down to the wine cellar...…...

[Reformation Bear 6,358]

I wonder if Club 1872 has developed a strategy for dealing with Rangers-related BBC biased etc reporting (or any media bias etc reporting for that matter).     Do they just wait until an incident happens then try to deal with each incident on the facts / opinions of its own case?    What we seem to me to get is reporting bias etc incident after incident with each taken on its own and when the dust settles everybody waits for the next (inevitable) incident and off we go again.

If they are not already doing so maybe Club 1872 - or even better Rangers media team - could perhaps be collating details of each incident that's taken place in recent times and registering the details, including responses and actions taken,  on a website so that the cumulative whole and complete picture is readily accessible and there as evidence for all to see.   Clearly details of the individual incidents could be gathered up by interested persons to get the same picture but if the work was done by 1872 or the Club's media team then there would be a single source of Rangers-authenticated detail of each incident and the outcome.

Why do this?    Well maybe there is significantly more weight to be applied against the BBC if the latest incident is put alongside previous incidents so that the cumulative factual case is visible not only to Rangers, Club 1872 and the Support but to the wider broadcasting regulators and to the wider world.     That way maybe more influence might be applied to cause the BBC to amend its ways and clean up its reporting act for all things Rangers.    

Right now I think we are in a media-dominated 'divide and conquer' way of working where each incident gets dealt with as a single incident with a mild knuckle-rap as a consequence.  Which is no incentive on the BBC or its reporting staff to amend their reporting ways.    They simply take the small hit and move on to generating the next incident and off we go again.

Create the cumulative record, make it publicly available (taking care to avoid libel etc legal pitfalls) and then call up  the cumulative history into the public domain every time a new incident happens.      The sanctions on those creating the anti-Rangers false etc reporting might then become more meaningful and the sanctions against the BBC itself might become far more effective.

Maybe that's all too much like hard work.  Or not in the spirit of past eras of dignified silence.   Or maybe the Club and its media team and Club 1872 would just prefer to take each case on its own merits and let the past be the past and of no relevance to current or future cases.   

[shotstopper 107]

Don't hold your breath.

[Boybluesy 787]

4 hours ago, SteveEarle said:

I also missed this post as I was nipping down to the wine cellar...…...

 

4 hours ago, SteveEarle said:

I also missed this post as I was nipping down to the wine cellar...…...

That’s the nearest offie then...

[Brackley 625]

5 hours ago, SteveEarle said:

I also missed this post as I was nipping down to the wine cellar...…...

Sorry, I was in the west wing. Have I missed something. 😁