Jump to content

When you see Clancy's cheating like this it truly is staggering.


Bristoe1872

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 hours ago, YearsofWar said:

I don't think anybody is talking about conspiracies in this case. Nobody is saying Clancy conspired with the SFA or was instructed by the paedo's to rule against us. I don't think all referee's are out to get us. However, We have an individual referee (who has previous against us) who - in most peoples opinion - went above and beyond incompetence. He could not have done more to help them win other than putting the ball into our net by himself. I've watched football for over 25 years and Clancy's performance was the worst i have ever seen. The fact that we won in spite of him should not mean we sweep it under the carpet. When someone is shooting a gun at you, you don't ignore it simply because they missed.

You are welcome to disagree that he cheated and think he is just a very shite referee. However, do you not agree at the very least that he should never be given another Old Firm match as it is clearly beyond him?

 

 

The problem is Clancy is bad- and if you look on here every ref who has referees an old firm game gets it tight and the implication is they are biased against us. I’m sure Clancy will be marked down for this game,  but I have no idea what that does to his listings / selection for games.  We all have good and bad periods at our work.  If I’m incompetent at my work I get sanctioned as I am sure you do - everything from a quiet word to the sack depending upon level and frequency of such issues. 
the way our support go on we will never have a good ref. This is a game we won. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Howsitgoing said:

Try to understand it from others point of view? I do see what your saying, scum are known worldwide for their paranoid victimised personas and none of us want our football club recognised as the oppressed victimised club, they pride themselves with but that’s not what’s happening here. 
This referee’s action went beyond honest mistakes and it’s not the first time.  This time and hopefully the other games against the scum, the referee’s actions don’t  have the ability to affect the best team winning but the other teams in the league haven’t the same ability that allows them to play against a 12 man team and it forces us into a situation where we must win all our games. Why shouldn’t we show our disgust at this?

1st paragraph I agree with 👍

second paragraph just assumes the refs favour them! But even if it does I prefer Walter Smiths take on these things - ‘you’ve just got to be good enough to win no matter how bad the ref is’ ( paraphrased) 

we won on Sunday - win our game in hand then it’s  happy days, win all our games - extreme joy!  It’s up to us not anyone else. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont expect a ref to get it right 100% of the time and I also dont think their intentionally bias, but I think their so intimidated by the scum that their scared to do anything against them or their jobs and most likely wellbeing will be on the line, gone are the days of refs like Dallas who just didnt give a fuck about their intimidation, I'll always remember him being hit with a coin, bleeding from the naper and 10 seconds later gave us a penalty, that was the strength a ref needs but those days are gone now we are left with shitebags who just arent very good at their job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said:

To say we are being treated unfairly is the same ( to me) as saying  the ref cheated - I have no doubt whatsoever that the referees are shite ( kinda obvious) but to think that so many refs, so many different linesmen, and all there supervisors all have it in for us -to me that is just simple nonsense. 
it’s also kinda funny if you talk to fans of other clubs who all swear the referees favour us! 

I aint going to keep repeating myself but safe to say I disagree with your comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, magic8ball said:

SFA shat it when Lieswell said they would vigorously defend the allegations 

I wonder what they will do with Christie since the same vigorous threat was made when he was citied 

Paranoid head on here ,is it just me who thinks they citied Christie because he’s going to be out injured anyway so any ban is     merely a token gesture 

The stigma of being a baw grabber will stick with him for the rest of his nelly puff. :matron:
Hopefully the outcome of his citation is guilty as charged,and it is delivered to him while he's laid up in bed for a few weeks. :mutley:
Give him time to reflect on being a fuckin scabby bheast. :tut:

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, scottyscott1963 said:

The stigma of being a baw grabber will stick with him for the rest of his nelly puff. :matron:
Hopefully the outcome of his citation is guilty as charged,and it is delivered to him while he's laid up in bed for a few weeks. :mutley:
Give him time to reflect on being a fuckin scabby bheast. :tut:

Maybe he can “come out” now and give broonaldo the gay team mate he craves 

it would also give them a PR opportunity to milk the fuck out of 

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ExilledWeegie123 said:

I dont expect a ref to get it right 100% of the time and I also dont think their intentionally bias, but I think their so intimidated by the scum that their scared to do anything against them or their jobs and most likely wellbeing will be on the line, gone are the days of refs like Dallas who just didnt give a fuck about their intimidation, I'll always remember him being hit with a coin, bleeding from the naper and 10 seconds later gave us a penalty, that was the strength a ref needs but those days are gone now we are left with shitebags who just arent very good at their job.

The question needs to be asked why are they so shite ,we used to have good referees who would get to world cups etc ,no longer the case ,And for me it’s not a coincidence that referee standards have plummeted since the tarriers started their campaign of verification 10 years ago 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said:

1st paragraph I agree with 👍

second paragraph just assumes the refs favour them! But even if it does I prefer Walter Smiths take on these things - ‘you’ve just got to be good enough to win no matter how bad the ref is’ ( paraphrased) 

we won on Sunday - win our game in hand then it’s  happy days, win all our games - extreme joy!  It’s up to us not anyone else. 

Wouldn’t say it’s as simple as the ref favouring them, it’s more to do with the media and the path for least resistance is clearly on the side of being detrimental to our league position whilst maintaining a structure that’ll allow indiscretions that’ll favour theirs.

The referee showed the card twice to Brown but that’ll be one of his many faults last Sunday that’ll never be giving the light of day in the media.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, scottyscott1963 said:

he certainly has been priming us to the fact rainbow baws is due to come barging out the closet. :wow:

Just in time to deflect from a disaster on the football front ,ie fuck up their 10 in a row they have been crowing about for years ,like it was already in the bag 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have deffo plummeted since then, I also think they all got a bit scared that time where Beaton? had to be escorted by the cops, the problem for me is that the scum are great at putting pressure on the right people at the right time, I just hope that now the tide is turning and we have learned to do the same minus physical threats to refs and their families that the scum are known for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Howsitgoing said:

Wouldn’t say it’s as simple as the ref favouring them, it’s more to do with the media and the path for least resistance is clearly on the side of being detrimental to our league position whilst maintaining a structure that’ll allow indiscretions that’ll favour theirs.

The referee showed the card twice to Brown but that’ll be one of his many faults last Sunday that’ll never be giving the light of day in the media.

The daily record online already explained the 2 yellow cards scenario ,it was coz Katic hadn’t seen it first time 😂😂😂

Clancy royally fucked up with that one ,he didn’t take Katic or the other yellow carded player aside like players do when they get booked 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExilledWeegie123 said:

they have deffo plummeted since then, I also think they all got a bit scared that time where Beaton? had to be escorted by the cops, the problem for me is that the scum are great at putting pressure on the right people at the right time, I just hope that now the tide is turning and we have learned to do the same minus physical threats to refs and their families that the scum are known for.

InTIMidation right across the board ,threats from fans and the compliance system and disciplinary system doesn’t back the refs up when it comes to things against seperate entity FC,on several occasions Browns been at the centre and never faced a ban or had a red card upheld 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

The daily record online already explained the 2 yellow cards scenario ,it was coz Katic hadn’t seen it first time 😂😂😂

Clancy royally fucked up with that one ,he didn’t take Katic or the other yellow carded player aside like players do when they get booked 

I think he panicked a bit, he realised he gave a soft as fuck penalty and card to katic then thought damn i need to do something else here and we ended up with.........

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

Quite simply refs are shite - they are not deliberately shite - just shite. 

Ok that's your opinion on refs you're entitled to think that but you didn't answer the question about the compliance officer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

We’ve been moaning about these ‘biases’ increasingly over the years. The refs are shite - Clancy is shite - but all this beating of chests about agendas, bias, corruption is just sad. Ffs even if these conspiracies were true they are pretty Shite  at it as we are going from strength to strength. 
Some are so bad at looking for offence that we can’t even keep the ‘legs all laugh at celtic’ thread in the BD- the thread where we laughed at there paranoia and whinging but can no longer do so because we have become that! Sad. 

There's no doubt the refs and their assistants ain't great. It's not an easy job considering how quick the game is today and how smart players have become and the gamesmanships that they use to influence their decisions.

But if in one game there's say 6 major incidents and the refs decisions all favour one team then logically that's very unlikely to happen. Think of someone  tossing a coin 6 times and each time it lands on tails. Is the coin rigged or is it just chance? 

If you look at just the 3 shirt pulling incidents, it should of been two penalties to us and one to them. Didn't happen.

In the first incidents its not crowded, the 2 players are in clear view, the ref may of been unsighted but the assistant is in the perfect position to see it.

With Aribo it's crowded but it not a brief grab of his jersey, he pulls it half way down his arm and throws him to the ground! Very unlikely that the referee and assistant completely missed it considering thats the direction there both looking in. 

How many times does the coin have to land on tails before you start to think something not quite right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, magic8ball said:

SFA shat it when Lieswell said they would vigorously defend the allegations 

I wonder what they will do with Christie since the same vigorous threat was made when he was citied 

Paranoid head on here ,is it just me who thinks they citied Christie because he’s going to be out injured anyway so any ban is     merely a token gesture 

That's exactly why they done it mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, magic8ball said:

SFA shat it when Lieswell said they would vigorously defend the allegations 

I wonder what they will do with Christie since the same vigorous threat was made when he was citied 

Paranoid head on here ,is it just me who thinks they citied Christie because he’s going to be out injured anyway so any ban is     merely a token gesture 

Brown and the cunt that elbowed Morelos off the ball should of been cited above Christie.
Think  I’ve the same paranoid head as you, it’s a token gesture to do their favourite past time, cover-ups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were numerous sightings for the unwashed . the bheast media machine , have turned it all around to Alfredo

The Christie one  is clearly just to appease and look like the little bint Clare , in consultation with slanty eyes , are being even handed and fair .:lol:

And don't rule out , it being reduced to 1 game or nothing . Like they did with Shrek few seasons back

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soulboy said:

Ok that's your opinion on refs you're entitled to think that but you didn't answer the question about the compliance officer.

I'm still amazed , anyone even debates with BP9 . It is a truly lost cause .

He has his agenda and it's one of disagreeing with passionate  rank and file  bears . He must be in the right then . The special one :headscratch:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...