Jump to content

Stevie’s Reaction.


Courtyard Bear

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Prso's headband said:

I’ve been to every domestic game this season and 4 out of 7 away games in Europe, but that today was hopeless. If you think a Rangers team can go 1-0 up at Tynecastle and still lose the game is ok then you’re the one with the issue. That is nowhere near good enough for any Rangers team going for the league 

What’s that got to do with what gerrard said?,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Bluekev said:

Flanagan was no worse than Davis, Kamara, Aribo, but when they start midweek no one will say anything. Davis has been invisible in the last 2 games and Aribo has done fuck all too and I think sometimes we wasted 50k on Kamara because on days like today he cost us a goal through sloppiness and never looked interested. Flanagan isn't good enough and that's why he's cover but the "regulars" should be blamed for today before him.

The point is Flanagan is poor every time he plays and we had better options available. Granted the other 3 you mention were all piss poor today also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BlueMe said:

In what way does he look completely lost?

He picked the team / formation, i get that, but at the same time, that's the same team (bar a couple of changes) that beat celtic at home and got us to the Europa league knockouts- the players let him us and themselves down today and bottled it, they deserve the criticism, not the manager.

Flanagan shouldn't have started, which was a mistake by Gerrard, but he was rightly subbed at half-time. 

Kamara was rightly subbed because he was shite, even if Ojo was the wrong replacement, you could still see Gerrards thinking behind it after the state of Jones against Stranraer.

And Arfield was a good sub to make.

 

Gerrard moved aribo into centre mid, that was another mistake today, 

Davis played the full 90, another mistake

Defoe was asked to play the morelos role, thats another mistake

We have no width from our wingers, theres another mistake

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

Gerrard moved aribo into centre mid, that was another mistake today, 

Davis played the full 90, another mistake

Defoe was asked to play the morelos role, thats another mistake

We have no width from our wingers, theres another mistake

 

I agree, for what seems like the 8th game in a row Aribo was our best player and he’s asked to play out of position again. 
 

Davis again, very poor.

The whole teams boots the ball up the park like Morelos is going to buy us 20-30yards, not going to happen 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

Gerrard moved aribo into centre mid, that was another mistake today, 

Davis played the full 90, another mistake

Defoe was asked to play the morelos role, thats another mistake

We have no width from our wingers, theres another mistake

 

Moving Aribo into his natural position was a mistake?

Davis wouldn't have played the full 90 if we didn't have to waste a sub at half time on Flanagan.

Who else would you play instead of Defoe when Morelos is suspended and Stewart was injured? 

We don't play with wingers, our width comes from our fullbacks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurrayWilson said:

Clearly polster looked far better when he came on and Paterson most would agree is better.

Most would certainly claim Patterson is far better, but in reality they've seen him do the square root of fuck all against two teams who did absolutely fuck all attacking. He's nowhere near ready to play against teams like Hearts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Junior Soprano said:

They do talk absolute wank though 

How? We were very poor today and our squad depth clearly showed without Tavernier and Morelos we don’t have match winners. 
 

Bar Polster not one player actually seized the opportunity to play in the first 11 today and that is very worrying 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Supersonic said:

Most would certainly claim Patterson is far better, but in reality they've seen him do the square root of fuck all against two teams who did absolutely fuck all attacking. He's nowhere near ready to play against teams like Hearts.

Well we will never know unless he plays. Hearts are bottom of the league for a reason. If we cant play a youngster against them then whats the point of the academy.? What we most certainly do know is that Flanagan is horse shit. No ifs, but or maybes about that one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BlueMe said:

Moving Aribo into his natural position was a mistake?

Davis wouldn't have played the full 90 if we didn't have to waste a sub at half time on Flanagan.

Who else would you play instead of Defoe when Morelos is suspended and Stewart was injured? 

We don't play with wingers, our width comes from our fullbacks.

Aribo was very poor in his natural position for many games until he was moved wide right, he lacks the fight so far for the Scottish game, strange decision given hearts were already out fighting us

Davis would have played the full 90 no matter what, he didnt have to sub flanagan

Defoe should play, but we should change to accomodate him and flanagan, instead of attacking fullbacks we play wingers and attacking mids, get someone to link up with defoe, we dont have like for like changes in the squad so why do we still play like for like no matter what

Your last point i addressed above

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MurrayWilson said:

Well we will never know unless he plays. Hearts are bottom of the league for a reason. If we cant play a youngster against them then whats the point of the academy.? What we most certainly do know is that Flanagan is horse shit. No ifs, but or maybes about that one.

If guys like davis with over 100 caps for his country cant handle hearts away, then ehat evidence is there that rookie youngsters can

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MurrayWilson said:

Clearly polster looked far better when he came on and Paterson most would agree is better.

So the right back who kept a clean sheet isnt a better option than the young right back who hasnt been tested yet and the centre mid converted to a right back who conceded two goals? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

So the right back who kept a clean sheet isnt a better option than the young right back who hasnt been tested yet and the centre mid converted to a right back who conceded two goals? 

Are you actually suggesting Flanagan played well or even ok? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Bluekev said:

Flanagan was no worse than Davis, Kamara, Aribo, but when they start midweek no one will say anything. Davis has been invisible in the last 2 games and Aribo has done fuck all too and I think sometimes we wasted 50k on Kamara because on days like today he cost us a goal through sloppiness and never looked interested. Flanagan isn't good enough and that's why he's cover but the "regulars" should be blamed for today before him.

The midfield 3 on Wednesday I thought were shite - slow,  lazy , uninterested,  everything is just useless side to side , it was the same today 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Are you actually suggesting Flanagan played well or even ok? 

You're missing the point, he's a backup player with limited game time, he came in so has polster and Patterson, would either of polster or patterson changed that game today

No flanagan didnt play well, neither did anyone else, they were all fucking rotten, but flanagan will be dropped eventually for his better option, the rest won't 

Flanagan has had good and bad games before for us, that is what puts him ahead of polster and Patterson, if we simply focus on bad games to determine our first team then we'll be dropping davis, jack, aribo, kamara, kent, defoe on wed night then? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

Aribo was very poor in his natural position for many games until he was moved wide right, he lacks the fight so far for the Scottish game, strange decision given hearts were already out fighting us

Davis would have played the full 90 no matter what, he didnt have to sub flanagan

Defoe should play, but we should change to accomodate him and flanagan, instead of attacking fullbacks we play wingers and attacking mids, get someone to link up with defoe, we dont have like for like changes in the squad so why do we still play like for like no matter what

Your last point i addressed above

It's hardly a mistake asking a player to play in their natural position for 20 minutes - especially when he was still playing further forward but centrally instead of on the right.

Fuck knows how you can possibly know Davis would've played the full 90 no matter what tbh and Flanagan was rightly subbed and left Gerrard with no other option because he was the worst player on the park and was also one tackle away from a red card.

Our system works well until you try and put players like Flanagan in there and trust them to do something they don't have the ability to do - changing our system to accommodate shite like Flanagan is pointless, he's bad in any role. Our bench is a concern.

You never addressed my point, i addressed yours and then corrected you when you said we played with wingers - we don't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...