Jump to content

Rangers + Club 1872 Statements


BridgeIsBlue

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, RFCRobertson said:

I think if a 12 year old thinks it's acceptable to racially abuse a football player, it shows exactly how bad the situation is regarding morelos.

And the reason that 12 year old thinks its okay is because its family thinks its okay, and they think its okay because the media hasn't condemned it at all and if anything has stoked it. 

I think it reflects what his parents think, find acceptable and allow. 

For the child's sake I would hope I was wrong.  And for the Father's sake I would hope I was wrong too. 

If not that wee kid is going to have a lot more problems in life. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 633
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, RFCRobertson said:

And the reason that 12 year old thinks its okay is because its family thinks its okay, and they think its okay because the media hasn't condemned it at all and if anything has stoked it. 

Over and above this, I’d wager his family, ‘cultural’ friends, pier group and by the sound of the video, the majority of support in the section it was recorded, are hate filled, spiteful racist bigots with anything to do with Rangers. Sad reflection of the ‘progressive inclusive’ Scotland...

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

The 12 yr old is being made the scapegoat. We all know the racial slur on the video  came from an adult but it would look bad if they charged a season ticket holder now, wouldn't it?

My ethics and most of the parents on here are family first, friends next, football team third, the right way to be. 

If the Father  puts his football team before his family and friends then he's a bad 'un and needs looking at. 

Has the proud father said anything yet ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, beararse said:

Perhaps it wasn’t the best wording I agree but it doesn’t detract from what I’ve been saying unless of course you don’t have a decent counter argument and look for a loop hole 🙂

I don’t think including the fact someone was charged in the statement was wrong considering the whole narrative we have heard all week is “Prove It”, well it’s proven. Its not our fault the scum went straight to their default position of we are the victim and claiming we threw the young lad under the bus. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, beararse said:

That’s all supposition.

In all likelihood you are right but that’s irrelevant. We didn’t need a police charge to raise the issue regards  the media which is the main thrust of the statement.

JT attempted to weaponise the police charge to further his end and its backfired.
 

JT is well sussed by his contemporaries and they run him ragged. He is a mill stone around our neck.

Alfie has been routinely abused both on and off the park for two years now, with no protection whatsover from the board in his defence. However that would not be new from them and how some can choose to overlook this board for that beggars belief, but unsurprising. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically it looks like the next generation of Scottish Rangers haters, racists and sectarianists are now being keenly trained by their Fathers. 

Nothing to see here in the great SNP/Labour socialist/catholic power enabling plan, except 12 year olds being trained as haters and bigots.  

As bad as ISIS indoctrination in my opinion. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bristoe1872 said:

Traynor was also one of those "journalists" who peddaled the "Rangers died" nonsense which was always going to be flung back at him constantly. Why Green employed him I have no idea. We surely could have done much better. 

My recollection of JT at that time was that he wrote a very pro Rangers article through either the record or sun....anyway he said it was a disgrace what had happened to us and had a go at the clubs, sfa &spl....next thing he was employed by us....point being he would never have written a pro Rangers article if we weren't about to employ him

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BlueMe said:

What's happened here is, imo, you've tried to come across as intelligent and join in the conversation, when you don't actually know what the fucks going on and you're clearly a bit of a doughball if you think "ill advised abuse" is even close to the same thing as racism.

Fwiw, you're right about @Rfc52.

Said already on here,  probably a poor choice of  words....ill advised even 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

I don’t think including the fact someone was charged in the statement was wrong considering the whole narrative we have heard all week is “Prove It”, well it’s proven. Its not our fault the scum went straight to their default position of we are the victim and claiming we threw the young lad under the bus. 

But you’ve got admit it’s fairly obvious they would look for a weakness in the statement and pounce.

Shouldn’t have gave them the opportunity.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

So we mention a kid has been charged for racially abusing 1 of our players and somehow we are in the wrong because hes just a kid , where was all this outrage when tarriers where bottling 12 year old bears 

Or shagging 12 year olds 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, beararse said:

But you’ve got admit it’s fairly obvious they would look for a weakness in the statement and pounce.

Shouldn’t have gave them the opportunity.

 

Could argue it was a massive fishing exercise and the scum took the bait hook line and sinker. To the normal person they look rather foolish, unfortunately there isnt  too many normal persons in the media  

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Laudrup1984 said:

As a number predicted.

 

He is one rancid bastard, pretending like he gives a fuck about the welfare of a 12 year old. Where is his concern for the multiple innocent young boys abused by separate entity fc over several decades? Utter scumbag. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RS4_wul said:

He is one rancid bastard, pretending like he gives a fuck about the welfare of a 12 year old. Where is his concern for the multiple innocent young boys abused by separate entity fc over several decades? Utter scumbag. 

He didn’t give a fuck about kids when he stood behind that Hearts player who was a Paedo.  Cunts like Spiers give me the fucking boak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Laudrup1984 said:

As a number predicted.

 

Was predictable that Spiers would be jumping on the bandwagon as it is all about him being noticed, not impartial journalism, hence the reason for wearing hideous cordrouys and sitting in the Rangers end at a match he was not welcome too. 

Also predictable he would have no opinion on a 12 year old boy abusing a player,  as abuse and children are something he has ignored for most of his career reporting on cellic football club.

As an investigative journalist he is shit, as a journalist who excels in exclusives that no one knows already he is shit.  As a reactionary and second to the post journalist he is a master, which he disguises mostly by deflection, and wind up.     A master of the craft of biased, non informative wind up journalism. 

Basically best to ignore. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This carefully selected 12 year old boy follows the pattern of the Christie (non)- punishment.

Seems we are dealing with a hive or swarm of these people who have placed or been placed in to so many media and other public sector operations in what is now difficult to describe as "Bonnie Scotland"

You have to also see parallels with snp and their chip on the shoulder grievance script.

As Boris says..........".time we took back control"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...