The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said: When did this 9-3 vote come in to force? I always thought it was 11-1? Years ago. Almost certain it's been there since at least 2012. 11-1 only applies to certain resolutions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 8, 2020 Author Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: Years ago. Almost certain it's been there since at least 2012. 11-1 only applies to certain resolutions. Ones that strictly only scew over Rangers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: I have clarified. The Articles lay out what comes under each type of resolution but you want the exact answer spoon-fed to you. You love spoon feeding folk, it massages your ego. Here, a critical factor in why one decision has been taken in preference to another and you say you're aware why, appear to accept it, but wont explain the reasoning and the specific part of the legislation yet you've barely ceased quoting for weeks 😁 Scurrying away looking for justification and been caught blindly supporting decisions which go against Rangers. Again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Surely the precedent was set in 2012 when it comes to voting no? Our club must have absolute spastics for lawyers. That was SPL ,different organisation now they can pick and chose whatever precedent suits their agenda now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Years ago. Almost certain it's been there since at least 2012. 11-1 only applies to certain resolutions. Aye the ones that will impact us negatively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Years ago. Almost certain it's been there since at least 2012. 11-1 only applies to certain resolutions. Which resolutions? 🥄 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 8, 2020 Author Share Posted April 8, 2020 Surely we should be given the cl place as we are still in europe and will vote in favour of what UEFA have asked for unlike the paedophiles? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 8, 2020 Author Share Posted April 8, 2020 Why is reconstruction only on offer if they agree to give the peados a title? Surely any fair minded person would call that out? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,152 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 9 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said: When did this 9-3 vote come in to force? I always thought it was 11-1? 10-2 was borderline had Hearts joined us to vote against it . So for a wee safety net they came up with 9-3 , and then , just in case , they decided on no relegation . Capiche . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,833 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Not only a corrupt title but a tainted Champions League spot. Makes you feel sick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelvd1873 7,159 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 I personally thought the spfl would wait to see what happens in the EPL. To now go and hand them a title, without winning it, before England has decided tells you all you need to know. celtic aren’t 23 points in front ... Liverpool are their FA hasn’t decided anything yet. But with half of Liverpool’s points total the spfl think it’s ok to hand them a title!! Games fucked, Corrupt to the core. There is no fucking way this would be an option if we were in front, Absolutely would not be happening!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 5 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: You love spoon feeding folk, it massages your ego. Here, a critical factor in why one decision has been taken in preference to another and you say you're aware why, appear to accept it, but wont explain the reasoning and the specific part of the legislation yet you've barely ceased quoting for weeks 😁 Scurrying away looking for justification and been caught blindly supporting decisions which go against Rangers. Again. Not when it involved c&p a couple thousand words and having to then putb them into a format that makes them readable beyond just being random snippets of text. The specific piece of the articles is several different sections which all feed into each other and determines which changes to which rules come under which types of resolutions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,890 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 10 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Surely the precedent was set in 2012 when it comes to voting no? Our club must have absolute spastics for lawyers. I think the Sports Direct Debacle answers that one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 6 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Which resolutions? 🥄 Lots of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, bluenoz said: Not only a corrupt title but a tainted Champions League spot. Makes you feel sick. Will our euro spot be tainted? Motherwell can still catch us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, kelvd1873 said: I personally thought the spfl would wait to see what happens in the EPL. To now go and hand them a title, without winning it, before England has decided tells you all you need to know. celtic aren’t 23 points in front ... Liverpool are their FA hasn’t decided anything yet. But with half of Liverpool’s points total the spfl think it’s ok to hand them a title!! Games fucked!! Corrupt to the core!! There is no fucking way this would be an option if we were in front!! Absolutely would not be happening!! I think they are under pressure to hand out prize money to clubs to help keep them afloat ,don’t see why they couldn’t have issued a percentage of prize money in the meantime or the amount of money that that any club was guaranteed to have won Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,833 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: Will our euro spot be tainted? Motherwell can still catch us? fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, gmcf said: 10-2 was borderline had Hearts joined us to vote against it . So for a wee safety net they came up with 9-3 , and then , just in case , they decided on no relegation . Capiche . Some crystal ball they had seven years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 8, 2020 Author Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: Will our euro spot be tainted? Motherwell can still catch us? Fuck up you dirty rat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,890 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Will our euro spot be tainted? Motherwell can still catch us? Fucking hell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, bluenoz said: fuck off. You can't have it both ways. Theirs can't be tainted because we can catch them but ours untainted despite Motherwell being able to catch us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,137 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, The Dude said: Will our euro spot be tainted? Motherwell can still catch us? Well there’s a reason for them to vote against then, we know that won’t happen though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 8, 2020 Author Share Posted April 8, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: You can't have it both ways. Theirs can't be tainted because we can catch them but ours untainted despite Motherwell being able to catch us. Joined in march 2012 I wonder why you wanted to talk to Rangers fans then. Rhat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 16 minutes ago, magic8ball said: Won’t stop you loving Rangers mate ,you will end up going off football in this country though many of us have already You are right, I will never stop loving Rangers, I am just not sure now whether this 'gifting of a title' means is it worth spending time and money going to games again. I am hoping my mood will pick up before renewal time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,152 Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Some crystal ball they had seven years ago. What on ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.