Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MacBoyd

The coronavirus and the sfa

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, The Dude said:

Rangers know as well as the rest of them that the season isn't going to be finished. The manager has also said he doesn't want to 'merge' seasons and have the players playing too much football in a short period of time.

Yes we all know that, but just because they aren’t shouting out loud that it must be null and void doesn’t automatically pertain to them wanting to gift titles and promotion to teams that haven’t put themselves into a situation to allow for this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Blumhoilann said:

This is a prime example of why Liewell and his cronies wanted the SFL and the SPL linked into one,total domination and at their first test,they've been found out.

Liewell is a slimey sneeky rat I think you are right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

"Over the last 36 hours, we have received numerous reports from fellow Scottish clubs relating to attempts to coerce and bully them into voting for the SPFL’s own resolution. We are proud that many fellow clubs will stand strong and not be swayed"

 

Scottish Football.

Corrupt to the fucking core.

Read that and makes you wonder what's the point

Bristol loyal likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

Never proposed/advocated it but nothing there saying they are against it. They are still currently hoping the season finishes.

Deep down I think the club would accept null and void but if they pushed it now and it gets defeated we are a sitting duck.

 

magic8ball and Blumhoilann like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

Deep down I think the club would accept null and void but if they pushed it now and it gets defeated we are a sitting duck.

 

Null and void might have failed, might have succeeded, we’ll never know.

But to remove it even as an option is yet another example of naked corruption.

Blumhoilann and Sweetheart like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

Deep down I think the club would accept null and void but if they pushed it now and it gets defeated we are a sitting duck.

 

Null and void is the only option. The only thing these corrupt bastards have got right is that the league should end as is, with not a single team having done enough to be called champions hence no need for promotion or relegation.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, The Dude said:

Where are the smoke and mirrors? You claimed I'm on 'the payroll' and seem utterly unable to back it up. It would appear the only one using smoke and mirrors here is you.

Smoke and mirrors?

The league winner's 2019-2020 determined by a contested vote = winning on a playing field 2018-2019?

I believe I have been fair and honest, do you have the same morals?

2018 - 2019 league winners won fair and square, under the rules. 

If there is a winner of the 2019 - 2020 season, is that win the same as the previous season under the same rules?

If so, why a vote?

*Voted winners 2019 - 2020 / Null and Void, there is no other option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dickie1963 said:

Charles Paterson says that Dundee's vote may not count

The SPFL themselves have said that clubs have 28 days to respond, so I can’t think of any reason why it wouldn’t, regardless if it was received before or after today’s deadline (that was in fact never a deadline).

Paterson needs to explain why, or he should just shut the F*** up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DMax399 said:

The SPFL themselves have said that clubs have 28 days to respond, so I can’t think of any reason why it wouldn’t, regardless if it was received before or after today’s deadline (that was in fact never a deadline).

Paterson needs to explain why, or he should just shut the F*** up.

I think things have moved on Bud. 

From a Dundee source Doncaster and potentially Lawwell (cant believe he would dirty his hands) called Dundee and they have decided to support plan. Why do that and promote Utd ?

Unless they propose a 16 team Prem ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dickie1963 said:

I think things have moved on Bud. 

From a Dundee source Doncaster and potentially Lawwell (cant believe he would dirty his hands) called Dundee and they have decided to support plan. Why do that and promote Utd ?

Unless they propose a 16 team Prem ?

They would certainly have to be getting something from it.  Farce of a situation to be honest.

Dickie1963 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...