Morals, Ethics And Sporting Integrity. Sum upThe Differences Between Rangers And Cellic In Two Concise Paragraphs.

[tannerall 25,935]

There's your challenge. Two paragraphs comparing the differences  in Integrity between Rangers and the club with no shame.   One paragraph for each.    No bantering, no needless language or insults. Just an objective factual comparison of the two clubs.

I'm sure there will be a few knee-jerk ones, maybe even idiotic or irrelevant replies , however I am confident that this thread will provide some great straight to the point summaries, even  some of the most relevant and finest posts on the forum.

Here's a previous (though extremely  flawed)  attempt to give you the idea.

 

[1690tamRFC 5,001]

Our club was founded by 4 lads, who through hard work, ambition and determination paved the way for the future of successes our great club has accomplished. 
 

they were founded by a priest who claimed he was doing so for the catholic community against “perceived” oppression and victim hood. Not much changed there then in a 100 odd years. 

[My Fathers Scarf 1,144]

Rangers - An outstanding member of the football and leisure community that has sewn itself into the social fabric of the U.K. and indeed Europe through abiding by the morals passed down by our fathers, being all inclusive to all members of our society, by being there when called upon and showing great charity to those in need,  by being lawful and educational in the way we go about our business and by being a pillar of society in what in most cases is a watchful and caring country.

 

celtic - An abhorrent organisation masquerading as a football club that ever since its creation has attracted the lowest form of life as a large part of its support. A club that has allowed to fester within its “family” paedophilia, terrorism , racism and bigotry. A club with no morals. A club built on shame.

[GersInCanada 7,775]

If the current position was reversed we would not be shouting for the title and if we were given it most bears would have a bad taste in their mouths. After all we did not win it. That is a fundamental difference right there.

If the historic abuse had happened at Ibrox the Rangers support would be up in arms. I could go on and on listing differences but it basically comes down to us aspiring to certain core values that they completely lack.

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

They are a bastardised football club evidently by implicating themselves in terrorist organisation throughout the world and knowingly allowing their club to be used by peadophiles sexually abusing young boys undeterred.

We are a football club set up to entertain our fans in a sporting environment maybe with the small addition of hating the said bastardised football team for their warped agendas. 

[Willis 20,919]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GiCnuAVtcYo&t=532s

[kelvd1873 7,159]

17 hours ago, My Fathers Scarf said:

Rangers - An outstanding member of the football and leisure community that has sewn itself into the social fabric of the U.K. and indeed Europe through abiding by the morals passed down by our fathers, being all inclusive to all members of our society, by being there when called upon and showing great charity to those in need,  by being lawful and educational in the way we go about our business and by being a pillar of society in what in most cases is a watchful and caring country.

 

celtic - An abhorrent organisation masquerading as a football club that ever since its creation has attracted the lowest form of life as a large part of its support. A club that has allowed to fester within its “family” paedophilia, terrorism , racism and bigotry. A club with no morals. A club built on shame.

Just me being picky.... you forgot to end “a club like no other indeed”

[Sweetheart 8,458]

One club is proactive in everything they do and seeks to change the inequality within the game. The other club is reactive they try to keep their club safe from harm by reacting quickly in situations where it exposes their clubs failings, by displaying manipulating behaviour that threaten the integrity of the game.

One club has worked hard for it's success that's why it's 'The Most Successful Club in the World'. The other club is gifted many treasures be it decisions, cups, titles, land. They forget about the integrity and inequality of the game, as they use their influence to be better than everyone. The holy grail for them is to have the title 'The Most Successful Club in the World'.

[ZZed 4,510]

Rangers founded on hard work and loyalty by four young lads. Septic founded on religious hatred by a child abusing organisation.

[southcoastbear 1,639]

I know it's a very basic and simple difference, which probably  speaks volumes ............ but 

Only one of these clubs supporters needs reminding of the need to have a wash and no be smelly bassas 

 

[BookWorm 4,119]

[mrmojorisin 13,611]

 

We Are the People

 

They are nonce harbouring scum 

[Bad Robot 21,147]

We have our Union Bears who don’t glorify terrorism and mass murder.

They have the GB backed by their club and support who revel in it.