Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bad Robot

Furlough

Should Rangers use the UK Govt furlough scheme   

228 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Rangers use the UK Govt furlough scheme

    • Yes
      103
    • No
      126


Recommended Posts

I’ve kept the poll limited to a yes or no so no sitting on the bench but the question is should Rangers furlough the non-playing staff.

 

Kevin McKenna: Why money-grabbing celtic make me ashamed to be a fan through furlough and covering up child rape.

I am one of those persistent lefties who become puce-faced fascists in matters concerning my chosen footballclub. It’s pathetic, really. You spend the week proclaiming the virtues of caring socialism and abjuring the ruthlessness of the free market and then Saturday comes. That’s when you turn into the lovechild of Margaret Thatcher and Augusto Pinochet.

There are no limits to your avarice in seeking an advantage for your team; your fury is terrible to behold when one of your own has under-performed. They must be jettisoned immediately and never be allowed to wear your shirt again. You are impervious to the possibility that his wife and children might be sitting in close proximity. It’s their fault too.

Where your closest rivals are concerned it’s not sufficient merely to gain the victory and collect the points: they must be humiliated and ground into the dust. In these games too, any questionable decision by the referee must be treated as a war crime.

You seek out a weak player among your opponents and set about the task of undermining him at every opportunity with as much bigotry as you can knowing the likes of myself won’t report on it. Very few aspects of his life are considered out of bounds: his relationships are exposed; his physical appearance and body shape are cruelly caricatured and any known personal habits are portrayed as hopeless addictions.

In normal life this kind of behaviour would render you unsuitable to be in charge of small children and very probably the subject of a social work inquiry. But this is football and football has always played by its own rules. It has evolved its own moral eco-structure. Irony and perspective flee; hypocrisy and petulance reside especially at my club celtic.

When you’re a celtic supporter like me you can sometimes shamelessness add sanctimony to this unholy mix. Owing to the origins of my club, which was established to lift our Irish forbears out of poverty and keep them away from the bad protestants, we pretend to ascribe to it the virtues of Mother Theresa. We say we are on the right side (that is to say the Left) of the world’s political struggles and scour the planet seeking oppressed minorities with whom to make common cause.

At the Jimmy Saville arena during lulls in the action I become an amateur vexillologist trying to identify the flags of downtrodden states and small African republics and am filled with the glowing certainty of the righteous. I patronise my friends who support the ‘wee teams’ by telling them that we are bound by a higher moral code yet I can’t flight my own union flag due to the vast number of terrorist supporters who I sit amongst.

I insult their intelligence by claiming underdog status even as we use our economic muscle to hoover up their home-grown talent in our quest to win every major prize (8.6 and counting) on offer.

I still give this club my support even when it seems there are more Tories in the boardroom than the 1922 committee. Until recently, this board resisted paying the Living Wage to its lowest-paid employees. It refuses to tolerate any trade union activity.

celtic has a few very rich employees who routinely earn more than £1m a year. At the other end of the wage structure they have many non-playing employees who are paid as little as the board think they can get away with. This week it chose to exploit the UK Government’s coronavirus bail-out scheme which will pay grants covering up to 80% of the salary of workers if companieskeep them on their payroll.

The scheme is primarily intended to help small and vulnerable firms survive without having to make their workers redundant. I doubt very much if it was intended to be used by cash-rich sporting giants like several in the English Premiership, the richest football franchise in the world. Like celtic, they too feel they must dip their beaks in the state’s largesse at a time of economic crisis.

It would be difficult for celtic to impose arbitrarily a wage cut upon their highest paid players, but I’d like to think that some of the millionaires on their payroll might volunteer to accept a modest levy to guarantee the jobs and wages of the non-playing staff.

celtic’s last set of annual results showed they had nearly £40m to play with, excluding £25m from the sale of Kieran Tierney. They have just concluded the richest sponsorship deal in Scottish sports history which won’t be far off £50m. celtic can afford not to take advantage of the Government wages scheme and leave it for much more deserving causes.

I understand too that it might seem unfair to be singling out celtic. I’d like to know, for instance, how many of those working in our richest financial institutions – those whom we bailed out in 2008 to save the economy – will forgo their massive bonuses in order to guarantee the wages of their most financially vulnerable employees.

And the decision by senior executives of the Scottish Rugby Union merely to ‘defer’ part of their ridiculously huge salaries is also astonishing. Rugby is a minority sport in Scotland and over the last decade or so, in a very small pool, Scotland have not been very good at it. But I’m a Nonce FC supporter and I’m simply examining the conduct of my own club.

In matters of finance celtic always insist they must deliver their fiduciary duty to shareholders above all morals and decency, a phrase that has become so synonymous with its directors that I expect it soon to be nailed above the entrance and translated into Latin.

celtic is the richest, and 2nd most successful and 2nd most supported sporting organisation in the country. It exerts a horrible and repugnant influence on Scottish culture that goes well beyond football. The club itself ceaselessly proclaims it’s ‘more than just a football club for nonces’. It’s meant to convey a sense that they really are bound by higher values than mere profit, but they really aren’t.

celtic stole the slogan from Barcelona who showed last week that they really are more than just a football club when their first team squad volunteered to make significant cuts in their salaries to protect the jobs and wages of non-playing staff.

The decisions celtic and other rich sporting organisations make and the attitudes they adopt at times like this matter. People look to them seeking signs of humanity and good leadership. Coronavirus is asking us all to be the best versions of ourselves. This applies to the capricious, grasping world of football too.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, My Fathers Scarf said:

Of course they should. It's a no brainer. The government pays 80% and the can, as they should,  pay the remaining 20% therefore no one loses but the club saves money.

Where do you think that 80% from the government comes from?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hadron Collider said:

Where do you think that 80% from the government comes from?  

It comes from us the tax payers. Liverpool,  Spurs, B.A., Virgin in fact practically ever major company is doing it but no we're Rangers. It's a sensible financial decision that must be taken. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, My Fathers Scarf said:

It comes from us the tax payers. Liverpool,  Spurs, B.A., Virgin in fact practically ever major company is doing it but no we're Rangers. It's a sensible financial decision that must be taken. 

It’s a shameful decision by these clubs as organisations 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dave Hedgehog said:

Bollocks. None of the above companies should have done it.

Utterly vile that any of them have. 

Its as bad as stealing when you take something you don’t need to the detriment of others. 👍

None should have done it but all companies are doing it.

I do however admire your principles. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, My Fathers Scarf said:

None should have done it but all companies are doing it.

I do however admire your principles. 👍

Cheers pal.

I just think in this pandemic the lasting memory for me will be the people who helped and the people who took.

I want Rangers to be looked on favourably.

The rest can do what they want and they will be judged accordingly. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd hope that we can urge our players / senior employees to take a collective cut of say 30%. Easier said than done. I'd like our club / foundation to make a donation to the NHS.

And I've no issues at all if we furlough. The govt havent put restrictions against businesses such as ours claiming. There'll be far wealthier and larger turnover businesses than us taking the offer. Not to do so is also daft as we're giving the scum further advantage that we dont need to. And it's really not the case that if we dont use it then the money goes to the nhs or nonsense like that.

So wouldnt be upset it we didnt but have no qualms at all if we do and think it makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said:

Cheers pal.

I just think in this pandemic the lasting memory for me will be the people who helped and the people who took.

I want Rangers to be looked on favourably.

The rest can do what they want and they will be judged accordingly. 👍

The poster asked us to vote on a topic which I done. If the vote was whether I  thought it was right to furlough workers then I would have voted no. But the system is there for a reason.

I too would love us to be in a financial position whereby we didn't have to do this but sadly I don't think we have  fully recovered from our troubles as yet. 

It's only my opinion. 👍

Dave Hedgehog likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said yes purely because other teams are doing it but morally it’s totally wrong and how they are getting away with it I’ll never know...never mind corona wait till the recession hits, life really is fucked for the next 5 years atleast!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Rfc52 said:

The players should secure the non playing staff wages. 

Some of our lesser paid people will be on just over minimum wage. Theyll need every penny 

People like morelos, goldson, tav, davis etc will all be on decent enougj wages that even a 5% reduction from everyone in the first team would probably cover it, defo a 10% reduction would

One player on 10grand a week is say 3 peoples wages, surely the players could do that 

Rfc52 and MurrayWilson like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...