esquire8 42,553 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Heres another brilliant "rule" for the SPFL..... If a club wishes to change to their vote before the 28 day deadline then they can request this through the board chairman..... The board chairman is MacLennan...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluekev 43,898 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 @Dan Deacon can run a crisps world cup in 2 days with no preparation yet an organisation like the SPFL can't organise a vote of their clubs with plenty of time to prepare. Shambles! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamgers 1,214 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Bluekev said: Our new PR guru should be on the blower to every media outlet stating the blatant corruption going on here. Totally agree with that, although anybody could furnish them with whats going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanRain 2,845 Posted April 10, 2020 Author Share Posted April 10, 2020 So, the SPFL saw fit to declare the result of a vote in which not only had all votes not been cast, but a vote in which they also failed to even check if all votes had been cast? Seems legit. Clear out your desk, Doncaster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,863 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Just now, Bluekev said: @Dan Deacon can run a crisps world cup in 2 days with no preparation yet an organisation like the SPFL can't organise a vote of their clubs with plenty of time to prepare. Shambles! Tbf that world cup was more corrupt than the spfl vote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,913 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Just now, Bluekev said: @Dan Deacon can run a crisps world cup in 2 days with no preparation yet an organisation like the SPFL can't organise a vote of their clubs with plenty of time to prepare. Shambles! 😀 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,553 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, Bad Robot said: Or Hearts voted No and we abstained to the last minute or were waiting the 28 days but that would mean our board were smart as fk so forget it being us lol We voted no.... Hearts voted no.... The club they are waiting on have voted but "they haven't received it"......... Don't know how to make this more obvious..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
foghorn leghorn 608 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Mibby it was our team who abstained to fuk the up spfl's clusterfuck system. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenv 2,125 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, OceanRain said: So the SPFL saw fit to declare the result of a vote in which not only had all votes not been cast, but a vote in which they also failed to even check if all votes had been cast. Seems legit. Clear out your desk, Doncaster. That's what happens when you run a vote and have decided on the result you want, and will get regardless (by any means necessary). We're just being told what the eventual outcome will be, as they've already concluded in advance of voting. My only real surprise is that it wasn't reported as 14 yes votes, from a possible 12. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerbarrel 78 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Did Hearts abstain in case of a legal challenge? It would make sense it was them for that reason? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 82,179 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Funny thing about this is the rest of the world call us a pub league but it's genuinely much much worse than that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,149 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 1 minute ago, esquire8 said: We voted no.... Hearts voted no.... The club they are waiting on have voted but "they haven't received it"......... Don't know how to make this more obvious..... But the SPFL said only 1 club in the premier vote no. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,553 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 1 minute ago, OceanRain said: So, the SPFL saw fit to declare the result of a vote in which not only had all votes not been cast, but a vote in which they also failed to even check if all votes had been cast? Seems legit. Clear out your desk, Doncaster. All votes had been cast. The one they now say they are waiting on was cast too but "they haven't received it". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,553 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Just now, Bad Robot said: But the SPFL said only 1 club in the premier vote no. Yup that is what THEY said...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,894 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Some of the press now saying that it’s the vote of Dundee that is in the deleted mailbox, sorry not been received. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdave30 8,701 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, Bluekev said: @Dan Deacon can run a crisps world cup in 2 days with no preparation yet an organisation like the SPFL can't organise a vote of their clubs with plenty of time to prepare. Shambles! 😂 @Dan Deacon for the SPFL board IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,553 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Just now, STEPPS BOY said: Some of the press now saying that it’s the vote of Dundee that is in the deleted mailbox, sorry not been received. Doncaster mail box full of Lawwell emails. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djwyc14 116 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 This is corrupt to the core. How can you release the vote results so far with some still yet to vote? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 They openly tried to bride clubs with reconstruction DURING the vote process. Japanese Peters ring must be on fire right now and it still didn’t work. Hopefully the shops have ran out of Vaseline, KY Jelly, Sudocrem and anything else to soothe his pipe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,633 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 27 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said: Peter's phone ran out of battery? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdave30 8,701 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Cunts couldn’t organise a shag at a whore house if they had score notes tied round their knobs. What an absolute fucking tin pot shambles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Rangers next statement will be interesting. Did they vote? Are they trying to enforce their proposal before 28 day deadline? Why was their proposal held to this deadline? Will their proposal void the fenians one? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,553 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 1 minute ago, djwyc14 said: This is corrupt to the core. How can you release the vote results so far with some still yet to vote? Everyone voted as well..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.