Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent

[Inigo 32,526]

3 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

Allies have already been set in stone. Ones that will stand up and show evidence once this goes to court. We won't pick up anymore due to this and won't lose the ones who have sided with us. This has fuck all to do with the unwashed on paper. Time to get nasty with these fucks once they vote no.

We've got to where we are, by and large, by being intelligent, patient and considered. Chucking that aside would be stupidity. We've managed to look considered and sensible, whilst the SPFL have come across exactly the opposite. Abandoning our tone would give exactly the wrong impression and we'd lose credibility. 'For the good if the game' is far better a tac than 'we're sick of sellic controlling the game' or any other ill-considered nonsense that would suggest that's what it's about for us, that this is all for the good of us, rather than the game. Keeping folk's eyes on the events, rather than on us or our anger. 

[Hutton2008 646]

2 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

Sounds good lad but tbf I think he knows what we all know and that's the egm will fail regardless.

I think Robertson’s interview will aid the EGM. 

Hard to argue with what he said. No bluff, no hate. Just clear intentions backed by fact.

[esquire8 42,395]

Just now, Inigo said:

We've got to where we are, by and large, by being intelligent, patient and considered. Chucking that aside would be stupidity. We've managed to look considered and sensible, whilst the SPFL have come across exactly the opposite. Abandoning our tone would give exactly the wrong impression and we'd lose credibility. 'For the good if the game' is far better a tac than 'we're sick of sellic controlling the game' or any other ill-considered nonsense that would suggest that's what it's about for us, that this is all for the good of us, rather than the game. Keeping folk's eyes on the events, rather than on us or our anger. 

The 'for the good of the game' tac is going to be what they say to vote no. I don't want us to mention them at all. I just want someone to put the point across with a bit more bite and passion. A person more snappier than Robertson could ever be. I guess we will have to accept what we have.

[the old guard 2,321]

1 minute ago, Hutton2008 said:

I think Robertson’s interview will aid the EGM. 

Hard to argue with what he said. No bluff, no hate. Just clear intentions backed by fact.

Might aid it slightly but I'd be astonished if 75% vote it through. 

[Domthenbud 899]

22 minutes ago, born a blue nose said:

We’re now the third biggest club in Glasgow according to this clown 😂

Wtf. Please explain.

[scottyc06 6,915]

I fail to see where we go from here? There’s no way we get the votes at the egm, if we even get to it, and I really can’t see us taking any sort of legal action with this without the backing of others within Scottish Football.

[B1872 20,676]

Can’t believe Rangers fans still listen to Radio Clyde. It’s a station by fenians for fenians. 

[Swally 6,289]

2 minutes ago, Inigo said:

We've got to where we are, by and large, by being intelligent, patient and considered. Chucking that aside would be stupidity. We've managed to look considered and sensible, whilst the SPFL have come across exactly the opposite. Abandoning our tone would give exactly the wrong impression and we'd lose credibility. 'For the good if the game' is far better a tac than 'we're sick of sellic controlling the game' or any other ill-considered nonsense that would suggest that's what it's about for us, that this is all for the good of us, rather than the game. Keeping folk's eyes on the events, rather than on us or our anger. 

Exactly, I think we'd all love Stewart Robertson to stick the nut in Lennon, rip Lawwells baws off, and then say in all phone-ins in an intense gravelly voice "Now you specky cunt Doncaster... I'm coming for you".

Might sound good, but it's not going to help matters, well except the Lawwell thing - one less tarrier able to breed.

[born a blue nose 90,731]

3 minutes ago, Domthenbud said:

Wtf. Please explain.

I’m assuming the taig meant them n Patrick mate 

[.Williamson. 82,031]

If nothing changes the entire game in Scotland will never feel the same 

[Dickie1963 2,352]

4 minutes ago, .Williamson. said:

If nothing changes the entire game in Scotland will never feel the same 

I think it's got to change. Whether we get an EGM or not.

[WATP-FOREVER 5,231]

1 hour ago, dummiesoot said:

Minutes from previous meetings are supposed to be approved and signed off as accepted at the start of each subsequent meeting. To fail to do so can lead to all sorts of accusations of failing in legal duties. 

Accountability is the objective of minutes of meetings.

If they're not signed off as a formal account of the meeting then they're meaningless and the meeting pointless too. 

No genuine organisation would fail to endorse their minutes. 

[Hadron Collider 30,813]

The ball is now in the courts of all the other teams as to how this pans out.  Rangers have brought it to the fore.  Let’s see what all these other fuckers are made of now. Do they still be the lapdogs or have the stomach for change?  Still hope some of them die as they have brought this upon themselves. 🇬🇧👍

[dummiesoot 16,003]

1 minute ago, WATP-FOREVER said:

Accountability is the objective of minutes of meetings.

If they're not signed off as a formal account of the meeting them they're meaningless and the meeting pointless too. 

No genuine organisation would fail to endorse their minutes. 

Agreed been in too many of these meetings not to have it engrained in my brain

[Domthenbud 899]

5 minutes ago, born a blue nose said:

I’m assuming the taig meant them n Patrick mate 

Oh dear.

[Dickie1963 2,352]

Executive Committee Members at many SPFL clubs are senior managers within major organisations.

How does it look if their clubs refuse to take bullying seriously.

Even worse some are Local Authority Councillors.

 

[KingKirk 25,620]

We won't be successful with the egm but imo the club know that and are just making sure every process is followed before court.

[Robmc1 4,741]

Just now, Dickie1963 said:

Even worse some are Local Authority Councillors.

Well judging by the behaviour of other Scottish politicians, lack of integrity or accountability will be no issue whatsoever as far as this goes...

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

2 hours ago, esquire8 said:

Nope. "We need to move on from this" "We cannot continue this for the good of Scottish Football" blah blah blah would say otherwise. 4 Premiership clubs will vote against this regardless. 

Now why would any honest club vote against an ii before they had seen the issues,stinks of coercion :-(

[JM1872 3,706]

What’s the latest here? Been following it on and off as still working and knew it would drag on. 

[VanVeenRangers 2,529]

Why any bear would choose to listen to a tim minded radio show is beyond me. Only the Robertson interview should be of interest. 

[TamCoopz 19,605]

2 minutes ago, MorelosRangers said:

Why any bear would choose to listen to a tim minded radio show is beyond me. Only the Robertson interview should be of interest. 

Probably why they listened to a tim minded radio show then...

[Bigdave30 8,698]

2 minutes ago, MorelosRangers said:

Why any bear would choose to listen to a tim minded radio show is beyond me. Only the Robertson interview should be of interest. 

If you don’t listen to it how do you know it’s anti Rangers?

[gmcf 34,101]

32 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

Roger Hannah a spfl lapdog

Guys a fud . Tbh I dont know why SR chose RC , much rather he went on one of the big shows like Sky . 

[Hadron Collider 30,813]

Just now, gmcf said:

Guys a fud . Tbh I dont know why SR chose RC , much rather he went on one of the big shows like Sky . 

Mate, I actually thought this was on sky. It was only on the thread I realized it was on fenian radio. Fuck. 😃