Frankie 505 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Another resignation today... http://www.rangerssupporterstrust.co.uk/rs...16&Itemid=1 David Tweed was one of the founder members of the Trust. It's a sad day when he's also had to resign because of certain policies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 doubts about Dingwalls integrity, his right wing- views are an embarrassment to genuine Rangers fans and when his name is on the RST committee then it means straight away any credibility is quickly lost and thus the Trust will be fighting an uphill battle. The man is in it for himself, just ask the guys who resigned from the RST. Dingwall represents everything that allows those who seek to attack the club with an endless supply of ammunition. If he had any respect for the stated goals of the Trust then he would surely accept that the sideshow he is involved in is only having a damaging impact. Is he big enough a man to acknowledge this and step back for the greater good of the Trust and thereafter The Rangers itself? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErnestWorthing 0 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Dingwall represents everything that allows those who seek to attack the club with an endless supply of ammunition. If he had any respect for the stated goals of the Trust then he would surely accept that the sideshow he is involved in is only having a damaging impact. Is he big enough a man to acknowledge this and step back for the greater good of the Trust and thereafter The Rangers itself? I understand that Mark Dingwall, despite what he said to the Daily Record, has been asked to stand down. He won't do so - and without his resignation, the Trust is dead. I also understand that the present situation of 7 resignations can be directly attributable to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Andypendek Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 I don't understand ANY of it, to be honest. Ernest - you need to source this stuff or else it's just more speculation! Why should anyone take your word over anyone else's? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friedmarsbar 1 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 This is getting really serious for all Trust members, there is obviously something serously wrong. Seems we will be left with the militant tendency, what a farce! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Dingwall represents everything that allows those who seek to attack the club with an endless supply of ammunition. If he had any respect for the stated goals of the Trust then he would surely accept that the sideshow he is involved in is only having a damaging impact. Is he big enough a man to acknowledge this and step back for the greater good of the Trust and thereafter The Rangers itself? I understand that Mark Dingwall, despite what he said to the Daily Record, has been asked to stand down. He won't do so - and without his resignation, the Trust is dead. I also understand that the present situation of 7 resignations can be directly attributable to him. The trust is dead anyway, will be full of puppets with Davie's hand up their arses. Got to give credit where credit is due SDM is a master tactician off the park ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts