Jump to content

RFE

New Signing
  • Posts

    439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

RFE's Achievements

First Team

First Team (4/12)

35

Reputation

  1. There was no crime committed even by the person who added the crosses. Many missed the point that media who reported on this said they "believed" it was on our website. Well all the articles are there for anyone to view so they could have seen for themselves but clearly it wasn't there or the picture would have accompanied the story. They ran a story with no evidence which was downright lies in some place, I know that will make some bears who don't like VB happy but so be it. They're not seeing the bigger picture here. What they don't get is we treat the scum and their mhedia friends with the same contempt and hatred they treat us so it makes us targets. We're not scared to get our hands dirty and realise that from time to time people will try to get us into bother or shutdown. Do you know how many times we've been threatened with legal action? Too many to mention.. Do you know how many times we've said go ahead and sue or report us? Everytime.. Do you know how many times we ever hear from these people again or their lawyers? Never.. And that's outwith the anonymous threats to us and our families, But on you go VB haters, stick your boot in. Thankfully most on RM do see the bigger picture.
  2. You make a very valid point, I couldn't in all good conscience support any fans membership scheme where the RST are the vehicle or the voice of the fans, It's much the same as I would like with those who run or want to run the club, a clean slate and the right people leading it.
  3. I believe CA post to be correct and if even if Andy Smillie was any way involved it was most certainly prominent members who took them to the ground and displayed them therefore endorsing them. Would I not be correct in saying at the time they were happy to have their name associated with the banners?
  4. Frankie my issue is with McColl and Murray is their actions, of lack of as the case maybe, in the past when they could have helped the club. McColl could have bailed us out or bought us several times but never then you have Paul Murray, to be honest I've nothing kind to say bout him so won't. Now this isn't another them and us, taking side type posts but it has to be pointed out that certain factions within our club & support have given their unswerving support to both McColl & Murray so my question is why? Because nothing I've seen or heard so far gives me that answer. Now before anyone else says it, I'm not what you would call pro-Green, I appreiciate his efforts but his time had come and he had to leave but at the same as he put his money in and owns the shares so someone will have to cough up for them. My problem is I don't want anyone currently involved to remain and I don't want the likes of Paul Murray & McColl coming in or thinking they can engineer a takeover of the club on the back of others peoples money and work. I would prefer a clean slate altogether because I'm sick of the scaremongering & propaganda from both sides. It's sad the supports only decisions seems to be what is the lesser of 2 evils? If we remove the current board and bring inthe likes of Murray it's like trying to put out a fire with petrol. Personally if Paul Murray comes back I will campaign from day one to remove him and will be there to tell him that at the first game after it.
  5. I think that would be the same for most of his critics, he was someone I had a lot of respect for a while back. As it happened also thought he was a nice enough bloke.
  6. The same people? You referring to some of his so called friends and fellow RST members? Trust me much the same will happen to you when you stop becoming useful. Its all about self preservation for some people.
  7. I must have seen the same questions posed to you at least 50 times now between here and twitter and have yet to see you give a clear answer. Have you ever received any monies from the BBC?
  8. Have I personally insulted him? No Has he personally insulted other Rangers fans? Yes and not always in any sort of retaliation so people in glass houses and all that. The fans are screaming out to find the mole leaking stuff to the BBC yet here we have someone representing the support being accused of taking money from them, so it's all very relevant. The leaks won't stop until everyone currently on the board or wanting on the board and involved with the various fans groups are removed, nor will the in fighting for that matter. Not one is putting Rangers first!
  9. Maybe he should take the time to answer the question that's been put to him most for the past 3/4 days regarding the BBC & DR. His silence speaks volumes as does his behaviour towards his critics.
  10. When he puts himself forward as the voice or the public face of the Rangers support then he is accountable to all of us!
  11. Why do you always disappear with some sort of smart arse comment whenever people ask you a direct simple question. You're the same on twitter where you retweet for followers to reply on your behalf while you you try to deflect from the subject. So have you ever received payment from the BBC or DR record?
  12. That is nonsense, so what was that all about when they welcomed Green for photo op's in the BF1????
  13. I think this should be the mentality for all Rangers fan just now, make them prove we can trust them!
  14. Sorry what? Exactly what was appalling in my post? If you mean the OP then you'll find that wasn't me, not that I disagree entirely with it!
  15. Sadly I think you're correct and that's a long way from what the Union Bears originally set out to do.
×
×
  • Create New...