OlegKuznetsov

They are absolutely and literally delusional. 
Apparently, getting kicked out of the top tier and going to the bottom was an SFA/SFL favour. 
I would say that you couldn't make it up, but they're proving that you can make it up and have absolutely no basis in reality for your claims.
More than a decade later, it's still only TBB they're targeting, other than a brief spell when a 4-2 home defeat made them suddenly realise that TFIO was an equal mortal sin. In that decade, scrutiny into the glorification in song of racist, sectarian, terrorist murders, occasionally chanted in English cities where those murders actually took place, was scant, but lasted just long enough to point our that these were actually maybe political anthems or perhaps just banter. Any offence was irrelevant where this free speech was concerned.
Yet we're meant to be getting favours? Really?
Sometimes I think that psychologists and psychiatrists are missing a gold mine in the form of a potential study into mass insanity and the role of social media in the promulgation of the mass delusion.  

They are absolutely and literally delusional. 
Apparently, getting kicked out of the top tier and going to the bottom was an SFA/SFL favour. 
I would say that you couldn't make it up, but they're proving that you can make it up and have absolutely no basis in reality for your claims.
More than a decade later, it's still only TBB they're targeting, other than a brief spell when a 4-2 home defeat made them suddenly realise that TFIO was an equal mortal sin. In that decade, scrutiny into the glorification in song of racist, sectarian, terrorist murders, occasionally chanted in English cities where those murders actually took place, was scant, but lasted just long enough to point our that these were actually maybe political anthems or perhaps just banter. Any offence was irrelevant where this free speech was concerned.
Yet we're meant to be getting favours? Really?
Sometimes I think that psychologists and psychiatrists are missing a gold mine in the form of a potential study into mass insanity and the role of social media in the promulgation of the mass delusion.  

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

They are absolutely and literally delusional. 
Apparently, getting kicked out of the top tier and going to the bottom was an SFA/SFL favour. 
I would say that you couldn't make it up, but they're proving that you can make it up and have absolutely no basis in reality for your claims.
More than a decade later, it's still only TBB they're targeting, other than a brief spell when a 4-2 home defeat made them suddenly realise that TFIO was an equal mortal sin. In that decade, scrutiny into the glorification in song of racist, sectarian, terrorist murders, occasionally chanted in English cities where those murders actually took place, was scant, but lasted just long enough to point our that these were actually maybe political anthems or perhaps just banter. Any offence was irrelevant where this free speech was concerned.
Yet we're meant to be getting favours? Really?
Sometimes I think that psychologists and psychiatrists are missing a gold mine in the form of a potential study into mass insanity and the role of social media in the promulgation of the mass delusion.  

They are absolutely and literally delusional. 
Apparently, getting kicked out of the top tier and going to the bottom was an SFA/SFL favour. 
I would say that you couldn't make it up, but they're proving that you can make it up and have absolutely no basis in reality for your claims.
More than a decade later, it's still only TBB they're targeting, other than a brief spell when a 4-2 home defeat made them suddenly realise that TFIO was an equal mortal sin. In that decade, scrutiny into the glorification in song of racist, sectarian, terrorist murders, occasionally chanted in English cities where those murders actually took place, was scant, but lasted just long enough to point our that these were actually maybe political anthems or perhaps just banter. Any offence was irrelevant where this free speech was concerned.
Yet we're meant to be getting favours? Really?
Sometimes I think that psychologists and psychiatrists are missing a gold mine in the form of a potential study into mass insanity and the role of social media in the promulgation of the mass delusion.  

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

They are absolutely and literally delusional. 
Apparently, getting kicked out of the top tier and going to the bottom was an SFA/SFL favour. 
I would say that you couldn't make it up, but they're proving that you can make it up and have absolutely no basis in reality for your claims.
More than a decade later, it's still only TBB they're targeting, other than a brief spell when a 4-2 home defeat made them suddenly realise that TFIO was an equal mortal sin. In that decade, scrutiny into the glorification in song of racist, sectarian, terrorist murders, occasionally chanted in English cities where those murders actually took place, was scant, but lasted just long enough to point our that these were actually maybe political anthems or perhaps just banter. Any offence was irrelevant where this free speech was concerned.
Yet we're meant to be getting favours? Really?
Sometimes I think that psychologists and psychiatrists are missing a gold mine in the form of a potential study into mass insanity and the role of social media in the promulgation of the mass delusion.  

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

She's just a reflection of the mindset of the great unwashed as a whole.  Their attitude is simply that they want everything that offends them banned but want to be able to sing/say whatever they want with impunity.  The irony of her getting the boot (that's not the irony btw) for attempting to defend a colleagues right to free speech whilst spending every waking moment trying to deny that to others is quite frankly farcical.  I heard an argument from one of them the other night that TBB should be banned whether or not it contained the lines up to our knees in bleep blood because it reminded them of the original lyrics - pointing out that the original lyrics were, in fact, about marching through Georgia almost caused a system crash in the dolt in question.  The old adage is that you reap what you sow so hell fucking mend her.     

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

Was she actually employed on a permanent contract with the Herald, or was she just a freelance blogger masquerading as a paid columnist?
In other words, is the claim that she was "sacked" just another distortion of the facts, another convenient lie to peddle their agenda?
Once someone has been exposed as an outrageously mendacious character, you have to question their subsequent claims in trying to justify the original lie.

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

I love how being demonised and pilloried at every turn by the press for the last 5 years (minimum) equates to The power of Rangers. Fuck me I would hate to see the the reaction of these people if we had been getting nothing but praise from what they believe is a compliant media. 

So they're angry that a claim they made in the media could not be proven and that the paper was concerned about being challenged legally and not being able to substantiate the claim?
Freedom of speech isn't about freedom to lie and getting everybody else to accept and promote your lies.
Democracy is not intended as a platform for bigoted propagandists above all others.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.

Yep. He really seems to have gone off the deep end. I just wish he delivered that rant in video format for the comedy value, given his ludicrous appearance.
He really is a bitter, bitter, bigot.
The scum signing this homophobic, journalist-threatening cretin really undermines his, and his colleagues', position.
They've had the full set of bigots in their first team in recent times:sectarian bigots, racists, xenophobes, terrorist-glorifiers anti-Semites and now a homophobe. 
Aye, they're so inclusive. They'll sign any kind of bigot.