BEARGER

We are being bled dry by both our directors and coaching staff. No matter how many games we win this season or how well we play, the pigs have their snouts in the trough and ain't going away of their own volition.

He has more than 700000 reasons not to.

Did not know that.

Sums up the problems we have within our support. More innuendo to split an already fractured support. Why not ask the club? Why not name names?

Said that on here last season, and was slated for it. Glad others see it. i bet they do.

The turmoil in the boardroom is keeping this excuse for a manager in a job. It's a gravy train at Ibrox, pigs in the trough and that includes super.

Not if its windy.

Me too. But we may not have that choice.

You get posters on here saying "they want the club ......", if they were real Rangers men they would buy out Green & Co, etc., etc. Read McColls statement, he has no interest in running Rangers. He is a small shareholder who happens to be a very good businessman who can see the the club is in financial meltdown and wants it sorted out. All businessmen are chancers to a degree, i would take McColl before Green.

A board paying themselves bonuses for beating part timers, a manager on 750k. And some think these free loaders should not be removed.

Does not matter what BP board would say. If enough small shareholders(5%) want a change they can demand a special meeting.

When he played for Dumbarton the fans called him "Hooff".

In what way is McColl trying to "con his way in"? He has stated he does not want to be a board member, just get the club run properly.

Every Rangers fan should do this tour, great day out.

Why are his politics very relevant? Is it only because he supports independence? If it was A. Darling would still be be very relevant? Or some other Tory?

Not sure what you mean but it's worth a read by all IMO.

Very good article. Think some should open their eyes to what is really going on.

I can definitely smell shite.

Can any of the posters spouting this nonsense about McColl being a republican supply any links and/or proof?

What McMurdo said about McColl and investing in Rangers; "McColl was part of a failed bid to get Rangers previously and is apparently averse to paying much for the club and opposed to investing in it. His reasons are seemingly that he doesn’t rate Rangers as a good business to invest in." What McColl actually said; "I am 100% focused on my own businesses and the strategy which I have agreed with the investors in my funds. I am duty bound to honour that agreement. "This is not because I don't believe investing in Rangers would be a good investment, it is because of the commitment I have made to my own businesses and to my partners. "On the contrary, I believe that with a strong, reconstructed, effective and highly competent board to restore financial transparency, stability and success to the club, it is a very attractive investment opportunity."

More nonsense from McMurdo and also inaccurate. No surprise there.

You require 5% of the shares to do that,. If you have that sort of money buy Rangers.

I hoped that McColl would make a move this time, looks like he will not. We could do with his money and know how but he is reluctant to spend too much on us. His call for more financial scrutiny are to be supported but you need the majority of shares to push it through. He is no Scottish Nationalist as far as I can see, he supports Independence so do Socialists, Labour voters, Liberals and Greens etc.

Aye possibly, but by whom? His wee P. pal? Will we ever know what has gone on. Edited my post to add a bit about McColl, hope he comes up with the money.

Oh dear.