Rambo1873

Without saying to much as I am not 100% in the know but it will be more than just duffy taking over!

There is also an issue with insurance, they cant play him because of it?

A bit OTT mate, but, partially true, especially the out of position part though. But the fact is, we were more successful, and, scoring more, generally not being over run like we are now. That was the main point. Is it not strange though, that now they moved to the championship, they certainly seem able to "kick a ball" though? The both of them are in better shape. They are fitter, stronger, sharper, getting played in a team that is put together in a positive manner.... And played in the right position?

To be honest, I think the Duffy thing is more just setting the wheels in motion for his consortium ie, park, singh, souness to launch the takeover! Ooops said to much there......................

To be honest, I think the Duffy thing is more just setting the wheels in motion for his consortium ie, park, singh, souness to launch the takeover!

A bit OTT mate, but, partially true, especially the out of position part though. But the fact is, we were more successful, and, scoring more, generally not being over run like we are now. That was the main point. Is it not strange though, that now they moved to the championship, they certainly seem able to "kick a ball" though? Thats were you question the manager and his assistants?

Me to :pierre:

On form today mate

Looking back, its time to go walter, no doubt about it

Fair point again, but we are talking about Rangers and Rangers only, not about them or aberdeen, Nacho should be bigger and more mature thats all I am saying, again transfer listed is a bit to far but he should certainly be repramanded by the authorities who be Ibrox

I think you are going a bit too far with the transfer listin shite I dont disagree with the wee mans actions on saturday atal, but i do think he will recieve some punishment from the sfa Fair enough but in general, we as Glasgow Rangers should not allow our players to behave like that, as it just kneels to their levels and I wont have that

No one is suggesting £1000 per year mate that's a one off membership fee - like joining a golf club. There were approximately 175,000 bears in Manchester with another 35,000 back at Ibrox. Obviously I'm not suggesting there would be 210,000 applicants bercause of this but i think you underestimate the reach of Rangers. There are thousands of ex-pats in the likes of Canada, USA, Australia and Dubai who would see this as an attractive way to "support" the club from overseas and keep involved. You're also not considering wealthy fans who may want to invest a larger sum for more "shares" and a bigger say in the voting process. MyFootballClub have proven there is initial interest for this kind of thing - with over 20,000 members initially investing (only £35 granted) to buy Ebbsleet Town. If 20,000 people with no interest in Ebbsfleet town can be convinced to spend some money on them what is the potential of the Rangers support? Clearly much more detail on any proposal is essential but i think it's foolish to write off such a scheme in it's infancy before the possibilities have been explored fully. We need one leader, one voice, because if we have the fans running the club then we would lose a mnager at least 2xs a year after getting beat at pitodri! :pierre:

My god are you for real. He's real alright, just took 700+ posts to out himself. common manticore, be realistic, just watched it on sky news and its the behavior of a 10 year old, and becuase I find ( mooning yourself ) shocking behaviour, it does not make me a selick man or less a rangers man for the matter, I can understand fans defending him but ultimatley he should be punished for embarrasing the club!

I am in utter shock at their audacity